Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

This 1 Kw/M^2 is valid ONLY at the equator, at local apparent noon (from 11:15 to 12:15 each day), on a cloudless day, with a perfect absorber/reflector/transmitter/receiver/converter. (In space.)

No matter how you play with your umbers, solar power is 40-75% more expensive than conventional. Even using the unreasonable assumptions of this advertisement.


222 posted on 03/01/2008 9:25:56 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
As you say, it does need to be derated by sun angle and atmospheric absorption.

Solar power is more expensive, in most cases, than gas/coal/hydro/nuke.

It is much cheaper the further one gets from the installed power line base. A full blown home solar system has a much cheaper installation cost than running a even couple miles of power lines, and is essentially free to operate.

As fuel costs continue to rise solar becomes more cost effective. It isn’t there yet, but will be fairly soon.

223 posted on 03/01/2008 9:40:49 PM PST by null and void (I slept better when I thought our betters actually were better...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson