I know where Clinton's speach writers get their keyboards.
Posted on 03/01/2008 7:32:05 PM PST by jdm
LOL
Today’s voter fraud news roundup...
lifelong my @$$
Ultimate stupidity.
I know where Clinton's speach writers get their keyboards.
Brain disease.
That’s what you call terminal stupidity.
let’s see, what could make a lifelong Republican vote for Hillary?????stroke, gun at his head, extraordinarily copious amounts of adult beverages,brain fart, extremely large bribe, global warming, political correctness, stupidity, wife ordered you to do so, (she’s a teacher),pushed the wrong button, (Obama gave that excuse for several of his inane votes), trying to get his kidnapped children back, who knows....this is America and you are free to be as asinine as you can....unfortunately!!!!
So idiots would rather plunge headlong into Marxism than at least try and vote for mcpain ?
I call that Slavlong suicide ! {Living like a slave till your dead }
Stupid ass people !
Pure and simple - it is a tactical vote. Obama is worse - as hard as that is to believe. Plus - a fractured convention on the Democratic side is a good thing.
We need her in it as long as possible. She'll throw the mud at Obama/Osama that RINO McAmnesty won't throw.
The more rat dollars those 2 spend fighting each other the less rat dollars they have left for the general election.
Enemies fighting each other are a good thing - KEEP HER IN IT!
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/mikesamerica/CCE00000-2.jpg
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/mikesamerica/CCE00000-1.jpg
http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j191/mikesamerica/CCE00000.jpg
Musta took alot of time on the scanner to get it right 3rd times a charm
Stupid ass people are those who think RINO McAmnesty is gonna be any better.
He's already assaulted our right to free speech. If he wins, watch how quick he kisses the left's asses and pushes the fairness doctrine.
We get a democRAT for president no matter which party wins. The rats can't lose.
You could ask, "Who cares?"
You'll never know that individual's voting history. And since his absentee ballot only lists Democrats...well, you have to wonder.
Elections bring out a lot of attention-seeking.
I don't remember telling you who i was voting for did i ? ...if you must know and you don't i'll prolly write in a candidate ...there is no winning side in this election just the absolute rejection of Nationalism i don't care to be on a winning side when all the sides are the same to ME it's a stupid ass move !
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."
Norman Thomas six-time Socialist Party presidential candidate and one of the founders of the ACLU.
No I'll vote for none of the above my conscience will be clear when they come for me and mine !
This lifelong Republican would vote for her in a primary in the hope that it would help keep the contest between her and Obama going long enough to get them both to the convention without either getting enough delegates to declare a clear winner, at which point all heck would probably break lose and Hill would be tempted to seal the nomination with superdelegates, following which no Black would ever vote Democrat again - it would be worth a try......
What makes a life-long conservative vote for Hillary? McCain!!!I recommend this blog.
I don't much care about Wall Street Journal political reporter John Fund's report yesterday that's roiling the blogosphere and cable news talking head shows. Fund reported that Sen. John McCain
Since Sen. McCain led a gang of other Republican renegade senators in deserting their party's sitting president and colluding with the opposition party to throw some of that president's pending judicial nominations down the toilet — jettisoning along with their confirmation chances the chance for a constitutional showdown that could have ended senatorial filibustering of judicial nominees — there is nothing that Sen. McCain can do, and certainly nothing he can say or write as a campaign promise, to restore his credibility with me on the subject of judicial appointments.
Oh, yes, he did vote to confirm Roberts and Alito. But could we possibly set a lower bar than that for someone who's supposed to be a leader of his party and a contender for the opportunity to fill as many as three SCOTUS seats in the next term?
There are a lot of good things that can be said about Sen. McCain by good conservatives — but not on this issue. By taking the "constitutional option" (a/k/a "nuclear option" in Dem-speak) off the table, McCain and his fellow "maverick" GOP cronies doomed not only a handful of worthy circuit and district court nominees to non-confirmation, they ensured that the White House would thereafter dare not make any more controversial nominations to those vitally important lower courts. For "controversial nominations," read "demonstratedly and predictably conservative nominations just like Roberts and Alito would have been, but for the higher profile of SCOTUS nominations."
The only way that the Dems could justify stonewalling Dubya's circuit and district court nominations was that the stonewalling happens mostly out of sight, and rarely if ever makes a blip on the general public's radar screens. They couldn't get away with denying a floor vote to a SCOTUS nominee. But John McCain led the deal that let the Dems guarantee that they could continue to exercise an effective veto on circuit and district court nominations for the remainder of George W. Bush's term, regardless of the outcome of the 2006 elections. The unquestionable result of the Gang of 14's "compromise," as brokered by John McCain, will be two-fold:
No sir, the day John McCain led the Gang of 14, he forfeited all of my trust — irrevocably — on judicial selection issues. No ma'am, I don't care what words he mouths now on that subject.
In fact, I'm slightly more inclined to believe Rudy Giuliani's promises about appointing conservative judges than McCain's. Sure, it's contrary to Giuliani's own stance on many social issues; and I'm far from entirely comfortable about Giuliani's campaign promises on this and other subjects. But at least Giuliani hasn't already betrayed this particular trust, and then equivocated about that betrayal. already shown himself to have no backbone, and to be a willing collaborator with the Dems, specifically when it comes to appointing judges at the circuit and district court levels. To the limited extent that I care at all what McCain says now, the mere fact that McCain continues to defend the Gang of 14 deal out-shouts anything else he says. And saying now that he "fought for" the abandoned nominees is just a palpable lie. The way to fight for them was to continue at least threatening to use the "constitutional option." There was no other way to fight for them. There was no other way to even get their nominations to the floor for a vote! To even pretend that those abandoned nominees had a chance once the Gang of 14 struck its deal is comparable to the Brits and French saying in September 1939,
Stepping back and looking at the big picture:
But just don't insult my intelligence by pretending that John McCain is a reliable conservative on the subject of judicial nominations. From the point of view of any knowledgeable conservative, this is one of the huge warts on this particular candidate. And he doesn't have to "wear" that particular lack of conservatism "on his sleeve," because it's a wart that's as plain as his nose. You can secure my enthusiastic agreement that the Democratic alternatives are uglier, that they're practically "all-wart." But quit trying to pull my leg about McCain and this particular subject, okay?
Maybe if McCain is making a SCOTUS nomination, he really will pick another Roberts or Alito. What concerns me, though, is that at best, he'll gladly let the Dems pressure him into packing the circuit and district courts with Kennedys, O'Connors, and occasional Souters. I have no doubt that John McCain would be willing to take on the Dems on matters of national security, even if it means a bloody, long-term dispute. But I also have no doubt that if pressed (and he will be), he would make his picks, and then cut quiet deals left and right, to avoid such fights over judicial nominees below the SCOTUS level. Since he's already abandoned conservative principles and cut a deal with the Dems on nominees to those courts even when the GOP controlled the Senate, why would he possibly stand up to them as president, especially if they continue to control the Senate?
Because Rush Limbaugh secret decoder ring says he is supporting the world’s smartest woman ever to be born who will sue Texas because the voting laws are so confusing for her, not confusing though when her husband won.
(First time I'll vote D in 44 years, since I votedd for LBJ)
As much as I despise Hitlery, I fear B. Hussein even more.
The way things are going, no one is even going to be able to suggest that he is a "Democrat," (much less acuse him of being a far-left, liberal, socialist or criticize any of his plans, proposals or record) cuz, that will upset the "messiah," and anything B.O. does not like, others fall all over themselves (including McPain) to insure they will not be perceived as racists or bigots.
Moreover, if Hildabeast get the nod, I believe that many blacks will be so pissed, they will stay home.
Next, as HRC's negatives are so high, many will stay home and many others will go to the polls, simply to vote AGAINST her--much as many of us did in 04 against Kerry.
Last but not least, it is pure pleasure to F*ck with the Dhimis and create mischief and mayhem, which will be the case if The Witch can pull off a couple of wins and continues to campaign.
Pardon me for saying so, but, are you guys nuts ??!! Keeping her in the race keeps her alive for the general. Any possibility of those two returning to power is too much of a chance to take.
Stop her as soon as possible by any available means.
Jeez. If she somehow survives this and goes on to win the general, we’ll have the “tacticals” to thank for it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
