Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, there you go.
1 posted on 03/06/2008 7:32:19 AM PST by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: edcoil

So when does the Revolution begin?


2 posted on 03/06/2008 7:33:07 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Who was it that said, “they’re coming for your children!”?


3 posted on 03/06/2008 7:33:56 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

WHAT?!?!?! >:-(

This is just wrong...how much of America’s history is about homeschooling of children?? These are not CHILDREN OF THE STATE, d’oh!!!

Pray for this to be overturned by the SCOTUS!! Because I guarantee you it will be heading there before long! >:-(


4 posted on 03/06/2008 7:34:11 AM PST by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
On every public school building, then, this sign should be posted
5 posted on 03/06/2008 7:34:41 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan ("The thought of [McCain] president sends a cold chill down my spine. ..He worries me" Sen T. Cochran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

ALL YOUR KIDS BELONG TO US


6 posted on 03/06/2008 7:35:07 AM PST by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

In other words, California courts believe that California children belong to the state.

If I lived in CA, I’d seriously consider relocating to another state.


7 posted on 03/06/2008 7:35:22 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Once again, the Calipetriedish is growing active rot. Will everyone just abandon the state or will they really fight for it?


8 posted on 03/06/2008 7:35:32 AM PST by Edgar3 (Steve Spurrier for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Combine this with

*legislation protecting teachers who wish to “inculcate a preference for communism”
*banning of “discriminatory language” such as “mom and dad”
*requiring teaching of homosexuality as “normal” and “equally desirable lifestyle”

and you see where they’re going.

The left DEMANDS to indoctrinate your kids, and they WILL get them if you don’t fight back.


9 posted on 03/06/2008 7:35:36 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

A Communist bastard in a black robe!


10 posted on 03/06/2008 7:36:37 AM PST by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Flee the state.


14 posted on 03/06/2008 7:38:03 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

“. . .parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children.”

Can we say abortion too?


15 posted on 03/06/2008 7:38:09 AM PST by conservativeinferno (My SUV is the urban squirrel's worst predator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: traviskicks

/mark


18 posted on 03/06/2008 7:39:29 AM PST by KoRn (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

I have long thought that a Constitutional amendment should be put forward that enshrines the right of Parents to:

1) select the education system and method for their children
2) the right to determine the belief system that the child will be raised with
3) the right to determine the associations and friends the child will maintain or distance themselves from
4) the right to determine appropriate punishment for their children so long as such punishment does not cause physical injury requiring medical treatment


19 posted on 03/06/2008 7:39:45 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

Constitutional right? Where in ANY state or the Federal Constitution is this right specifically DENIED? The mandate is for children to be sufficiently instructed in the basic arts of communication and reasoning to be functioning adults in today’s world, and the PUBLIC schools have failed in fulfilling that ideal, sometimes miserably and with catastrophic results.

Common sense, by its very lack, is truly an uncommon asset.


21 posted on 03/06/2008 7:39:47 AM PST by alloysteel (No provision for ANY political party was ever written in the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
Justice H. Walter Croskey

Tyrant.

22 posted on 03/06/2008 7:39:48 AM PST by EternalVigilance ("What fellowship has light with darkness?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

And where in the Constitution does it say you MUST put your kids in a public or private school?

USSC here we come.


24 posted on 03/06/2008 7:41:27 AM PST by Ron in Acreage (Jorge Bush has a 90% approval rating--In Mexico. McCain too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
Another story about this case identified the court as a California appellate court. So there are several levels of appeals to go through from here. This judge willfully ignored settled case law to get to where he got.

Freeper researchers, is this weasel a Democrat??

25 posted on 03/06/2008 7:42:19 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

I’m assuming this is a state court ruling. It sounds like Justice H. Walter Croskey needs the Rose Bird treatment. Further, the legislature needs to modify the statutes so that future nut-case judges can’t easily write decisions like this.


28 posted on 03/06/2008 7:43:07 AM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil

The SCOTUS should have no trouble overturning this. If it doesn’t, the term “public school” should be officially deleted and replaced by “public reeducation camp”. Even the weasley language about private schools is BS, since the left has strangled vouchers.


31 posted on 03/06/2008 7:45:10 AM PST by cake_crumb (I will criticize Obama as much and as often as I want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: edcoil
“The sweeping February 29th ruling says that California law requires ‘persons between the ages of six and eighteen’ to be in ‘public full-time day school,’ or a ‘private full-time day school’ or ‘instructed by a tutor who holds a valid state teaching credential for the grade being taught’.”

The HSLDA has advised previously that homeschoolers can generally homeschool by qualifying as a “private full-time day school.” If one looks at the section of California law that govern, it's not tough to qualify.

I imagine that most homeschoolers in California probably qualify through this part of the law, or through association with a qualified private school. One wonders whether the appeals court meant to radically change the interpretation of the law to disqualify homeschoolers who use these legal avenues to homeschool (in which case they appear to have ignored the plain reading of the law), or whether the appeals court was merely stating that in THIS CASE, the legal requirements had not been met.

I read the opinion quickly the other day, and it appeared that the family was claiming some sort of umbrella-like association, and the appeals court specifically rejected their particular claim. I'm unsure that the court actually meant to negate the legality of everyone who is homeschooling through these legal methods.

32 posted on 03/06/2008 7:45:14 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson