[Rick.Donaldson]

I totally agree...the handgun problem can’t be ignored... all people should be able to carry their handguns with them, without licensing, and anywhere they wish.

Criminals will think TWICE or THREE times before pulling a weapon out in a crowded mall, or school if most people are ARMED.

[coloradan]

Another gun free zone, another mass murder. Yawn.

[Rick.Donaldson]

Interpersonal conflicts are much the same way. When disagreements get heated and violent, the violence frequently escalates to firearms and someone gets shot. Without the gun, there may be a fistfight but those are usually not as deadly. Do you remember when handguns were called “Saturday Night Specials?” It was a reference to guns used when domestic disputes resulted in violence. Tempers flared and the result was a shooting. But, no gun, no shooting. And have you ever heard of a drive-by stabbing?

Umm... No, dumbass-author, "Saturday night specials" were called that because they were cheaply made guns that usually fall apart in your hands after fired once or twice.....

[Rick.Donaldson]

Clearly, handguns are a problem, yet we do little about them.

Umm no, dumbass-author, CRIMINALS committing CRIMES are the problem.. CLEARLY we don't do enough about CRIMINALS. We also don't do enough about dumbass-liberal-authors who write dumbass crap like this and get away with it.

[Rick.Donaldson]

So what can we do? One approach would be to allow the manufacture and sale of handguns only to law enforcement agencies. That would not infringe upon the right to “keep and bear arms” but the effect would certainly be to eventually curtail the availability of handguns. Or, how about tightly controlling the manufacture and distribution of ammunition? Both of these suggestions would control the supply of handguns and not directly restrict individual freedoms but would certainly have an impact.

What to do? What to do? Continue to wring your hands, you dumbass-liberal-author and rest peaceably at night knowing there are people like me and other Freepers who would still defend your dumbass life using one of your hated handguns if someone tried to hurt, maim or kill you.

[joe fonebone]

the only problem i have with handguns is that i have large fingers, and have a hard time finding one that i can put my fingers into, and will still be small enough to carry....

[Rick.Donaldson]

Another approach would be to heavily tax either handguns, ammunition or both. Or a registration of $1,000 per year also might dissuade more than a few from purchasing handguns.

I think a bill needs to be introduced to heavily tax articles like this, at an amount 3-10 times the amount someone might get paid for writing such an article.

This will help prevent lies and misinformation.

[andy58-in-nh]

Based solely upon their historical coddling of criminals, Democrats are far more dangerous than handguns. Perhaps every time someone registers as a Democrat, we ought to charge them $1000 and send the proceeds to their victims.

[G Larry]

ya!
Mine is trying to decide which one’s I can afford, since I can’t have all that I want!

THAT is a problem!

[bill1952]

the most surprising things in the aftermath was an almost complete lack of discussion on the topic of gun control

Yawn. Read Constitution.
Discussion complete.

[Rick.Donaldson]

It’s clear any attempt to directly limit handgun ownership will cause huge constitutional battles but as suggested, there are other ways to accomplish the objective of limiting availability. There is no single magic solution to the handgun problem. Nonetheless, to continue to ignore the enormous human cost accompanying widespread distribution is an embarrassment. We should be a better society than that.

What is "clear" here is your attempt to circumvent the Second Amendment, and you are a CRIMINAL for trying to do this.

[steve-b]

Have we as a country given up on the notion of limiting access to firearms for the general population?

Yes, dumbass. It happened when the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified.

[Izzy Dunne]

If these criminals will obey the gun laws, then maybe we just just pass a law against killing people and let them obey that.

Oh, wait...

[gjeiii]

If I correctly understand the author, does not the following obviate the author’s argument ?

“It isn’t that we are a particularly violent society. Our violent crime rate is about average for industrialized nations. Even as bad as TV and movies are about encouraging violence, we’re still not too far from the rest of the world. Where we differ is how we do our violence.”

[shezza]

Over a third of all police officers who die in the line of duty each year are shot, mostly by handguns. Clearly, handguns criminals are a problem, yet we do little about them.

There -- fixed it.

The rare occasions when handguns actually do protect safety — and this seldom happens — are far outweighed by deaths caused by them.

What cave has this cretin been living in? Handguns save lives as well as deter potentially fatal attacks by criminal riff-raff every single day of the year. Oh, I forgot. Those incidences were merely the "acting out" of disenfranchised yoots who actively protest the unfair state of society the only way they know how. Crime can only be defined if it involves racial or homophobic hatred.

[Osage Orange]

An armed society is a polite society.......

molon labe

[SECURE AMERICA]

Typical leftwing nonsense. We need to do something about handguns? You mean the over 2000 separate laws already on the books are not working?
Hum. If the anti handgun laws are not working,THEN THAT MAY MEAN THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE TOOL BUT THE PEOPLE THAT USE THE TOOL.
Of course that little piece of common sense never resonates with the anti gunners.
The use of the handgun over the shotgun argument is a loser.
If these nut bags wanted to murder a lot of people fast and did not get access to a handgun then the next step is IED’s Anthrax, or some other mass murder weapon.
No thanks. We do not need more guns laws. We need to allow all free citizens to do what their forefathers desired for them. To be able to protect themselves.

[Rick.Donaldson]

Come on coward. Step up to the plate and defend this guy. You’re a worm.

[Hacklehead]

“So what can we do? One approach would be to allow the manufacture and sale of handguns only to law enforcement agencies. That would not infringe upon the right to “keep and bear arms”

And only allowing politicians to talk politics would not infringe on freedom of speech.

[SiVisPacemParaBellum]

I have only one problem with handguns...I don't have enough of them.