Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Client 9 will pay for everything...' (Spitzer mailed hooker cash across state lines)
NY Daily News ^ | 3/10/08 | NY Daily News

Posted on 03/10/2008 4:06:54 PM PDT by jimbo123

In an FBI affidavit filed March 5 in Manhattan Federal Court, prosecutors described complex discussions about a payment for sending a hooker named "Kristen" on the train to Washington to meet Client 9 in a hotel on Feb. 13 - the night before Valentine's Day. Sources said Gov. Eliot Spitzer was Client 9.

Spitzer was in Washington to testify the next day at the House Financial Services Committee about troubles in the bond market.

Below are excerpts of the transcripts of the wiretapped calls:

On February 11, 2008, at approximately 10:53 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, sent a text message to CECIL SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie," a/k/a "Kate," the defendant, at the 3390 Number. In the text message, LEWIS wrote: 'Pls let me know if [Client-9's] 'package'(believed to be a reference to a deposit of money sent by mail) arrives 2mrw. Appt wd b on Wed."

SUWAL sent a text message back to LEWIS, stating: 'K."

On February 12, 2008, at approximately 2:37 p.m., TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a 'Rachelle," the defendant, using the 6587 Number, called a prostitute who the Emperors Club marketed using the name "Kristen." During the call, LEWIS left a message for "Kristen" that the "deposit" had not arrived today, but that they should be able to do the trip if the deposit arrived tomorrow.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: client9; democrat; hooker; prostitution; spitzer; spitzmas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last
LEWIS confirmed that Client-9 would be paying for everything - train tickets, cab fare from the hotel and back, mini bar or room service, travel time, and hotel. LEWIS said that they would probably not know until 3 p.m. if the deposit arrived because Client-9 would not do traditional wire transferring.
1 posted on 03/10/2008 4:06:55 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: prometheus1982

Try telling that to Mrs. Spitzer.


3 posted on 03/10/2008 4:11:37 PM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Holy Cow, are these chicks beautiful. See Huffington Post.

Ouch!


4 posted on 03/10/2008 4:12:33 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982
And Spitzer just has bundles of $5000 bills to pass around. Where did the money come from? That is where the rubber meets the,....whatever.
5 posted on 03/10/2008 4:12:47 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982

Larry Craig, Larry Craig, Larry Craig, Larry Craig, Larry CLarry Craig, raig, Larry Craig, Larry Craig, Larry Craig, Larry Craig.

Spitzer violated a Federal Law, the Mann Act in addition to using a hooker.

His treatment should be comparable to what Larry Craig received for foottapping and commensurately more severe considering the degree of the offense.

I LOVE it when Dems cash and burn


6 posted on 03/10/2008 4:13:16 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982
Except that as Attorney General of NY he was busting prostitution rings. Surely you can see the hypocrisy.
7 posted on 03/10/2008 4:15:21 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

That’s the $64,000 question. This guy was clearly mailing large sums of US currency. Where did he get it?


8 posted on 03/10/2008 4:18:11 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0310082spitzer1.html


9 posted on 03/10/2008 4:18:17 PM PDT by RDTF (Go AEGIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Who couldn’t...another Dem?


10 posted on 03/10/2008 4:18:33 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

It’s SPITZMAS!!!


11 posted on 03/10/2008 4:19:46 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Not that I’m promoting this activity, but wasn’t there an easier way to achieve the goal? Relatively speaking, planning this meeting sounds like the planning that went into the Normandy invasion, and he still got busted.


12 posted on 03/10/2008 4:19:50 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982
prometheus1982
Since Mar 3, 2008


take out hypocrisy and I have ZERO problems with this.
Yeah, me too ... like OJ Clinton, it was his personal life. /s
13 posted on 03/10/2008 4:20:16 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
'zackly.

Where does any public office holder get $5,000 for a quickie ?
Prostitution is almost always mob related, so how many Gumbas knew about this ? Did they find the information useful ?

14 posted on 03/10/2008 4:21:49 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Client Nine From Outer Space.


15 posted on 03/10/2008 4:22:41 PM PDT by Argus (Obama: All turban and no goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982

I have a daughter, so I am anti prostitution. NOT that she would EVER do that. But that if something is so horrible, so evil, that I would not want my daughter doing it, then I really don’t want any daughters doing it and it is ILLEGAL anyway.


16 posted on 03/10/2008 4:22:48 PM PDT by buffyt (Glowbull warming - Climate Change - the biggest hoax/fraud/deception of the 21st century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Doesn’t this also violate the Mann Act?


17 posted on 03/10/2008 4:23:18 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Heir to a huge fortune.


18 posted on 03/10/2008 4:23:41 PM PDT by buffyt (Glowbull warming - Climate Change - the biggest hoax/fraud/deception of the 21st century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I would think cash through the mail would be a lesser to charge of white slavery or taking women across state lines for immoral purposes.

Then there is the source of the funds. Where did the money come from?


19 posted on 03/10/2008 4:25:15 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

“Where did the money come from?”

He’s a bizzillionaire. The better question is whether he got a discount because he was the Attorney General or Governor. Being paid to look the other way, you know.


20 posted on 03/10/2008 4:28:38 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982

I understand the libertarian PoV, but whether anyone likes it or not Spitzer has seemingly violated federal law, The Mann Act, as well as the local laws of NY State and the District of Columbia by engaging in a money transaction for sex. He may also, based on the transcript, be a repeat offender and may even be involved in forwarding a criminal conspiracy. A person may think the laws are too intrusive to a person’s liberty, but until rescinded they are law, and he is the Chief Executive of New York State, charged under the state’s Constitution with faithfully executing the laws of the state.


21 posted on 03/10/2008 4:29:23 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

It was only a state matter until money went from one state to another. Now it’s federal and he’s in trouble.


22 posted on 03/10/2008 4:30:53 PM PDT by darkangel82 (If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. (Say no to RINOs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Audit his taxes, where he will become the catcher.


23 posted on 03/10/2008 4:30:53 PM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Yes, he should be charged under the Mann Act. Spitzer was engaiging in human trafficking in prostitution because he knowingly paid for her transportation across state lines.


24 posted on 03/10/2008 4:31:39 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: jimbo123

Now the question is, where did Client #9 get the $4,400 for this little encounter? And the $ for the prior encounters? If this happened when he was Attorney General for the State of NY, he was probably making $150K per year — you don’t go forking over $4,400 for 2 hours of servicing if it’s coming out of your own pocket and representing 3% of your annual income (before high taxes). Follow the money!


27 posted on 03/10/2008 4:33:18 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Spitzer is loaded. He grew up the son of a millionaire and has numerous NYC real estate interests and resulting cash flow.


28 posted on 03/10/2008 4:35:07 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought
Is this her?


29 posted on 03/10/2008 4:37:40 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: xkaydet65

Some Mann Act info from wikipedia:

Mann Act case decisions by the United States Supreme Court

* Hoke v. United States (227 U.S. 308, 322) (1913). The Court held that Congress could not regulate prostitution per se, as that was strictly the province of the states. Congress could, however, regulate interstate travel for purposes of prostitution or “immoral purposes”.
* Athanasaw v. United States (227 U.S. 326, 328) (1913). The Court decided that the law was not limited strictly to prostitution, but to “debauchery” as well.
* Caminetti v. United States (242 U.S. 470, 484-85) (1917). The Court decided that the Mann Act applied not strictly to purposes of prostitution, but to other noncommercial consensual sexual liaisons. Thus consensual extramarital sex falls within the genre of “immoral sex”.
* Gebardi v. United States (287 U.S. 112) (1932). The Court held that the statutory intent was not to punish a woman’s acquiescence; therefore, consent by the woman does not expose her to liability.
* Cleveland v. United States (329 U.S. 14, 16-17) (1946). The Court decided that a person can be prosecuted under the Mann Act even when married to the woman if the marriage is polygamous. Thus polygamous marriage was determined to be an “immoral purpose”.
* Bell v. United States (349 U.S. 81, 83) (1955). The Supreme Court decided that simultaneous transportation of two women across state lines constituted only one violation of the Mann Act, not two violations.


32 posted on 03/10/2008 4:38:36 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Everyone should know by now that lawyers(particularily DemocRat lawyers) have no respect for the laws. They use the laws to further their position, but violate any law that they think they can get away with.
If you don’t get caught..you haven’t broken the law.
Political payoffs, earmarks, bribes..sex for favors..special stock deals with the Chinese. All fair game and hardly raises an eyebrow with our MSM.
We need to clean house.


33 posted on 03/10/2008 4:39:21 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Number 9...number 9...

This is gonna be better then "What's the frequency, Kenneth?"

34 posted on 03/10/2008 4:40:07 PM PDT by Regulator (The Walrus Was Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

I should have added that it carries 5 years per act.


35 posted on 03/10/2008 4:42:32 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982

I totally agree with you...legalize it.


36 posted on 03/10/2008 4:42:57 PM PDT by Hildy (You know you're in love when you can't fall asleep cause reality is finally better than your dreams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Looks like Spitzer is going be needing this for the prison showers...


37 posted on 03/10/2008 4:43:18 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

No he should not be charged under the Mann Act. He was only wiring money for sex. If he was wiring money for cigarettes, then it would be a different story. BJ clearly established the precedent for the sex exception for a rat politician. Hypocrisy does not count either. BJ was subjected to questions about sex with ML only because of the 1994 law that he signed. Spitzer is a rat crusader who is allowed to prosecute escort services but he is clearly above the law as to his usage of these services.


38 posted on 03/10/2008 4:43:32 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Number 9...number 9...

Hello...my name is Bawwwnd...Spitzer Bawwwnd...

Client double-O nine...

Wanna go up to my rooooom?

39 posted on 03/10/2008 4:47:45 PM PDT by O Neill (Aye, Katie Scarlett, the ONLY thing that lasts is the land...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: O Neill
Shaken, not stirred?

This summer is gonna be a riot with this guy going down!

Buy Enquirer stock now...

40 posted on 03/10/2008 4:50:34 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

You are an evil evil man. Now I have to go bleach my eyes.


41 posted on 03/10/2008 4:58:27 PM PDT by Hacklehead (Crush the liberals, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the hippies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

“Client 9” is accused of “interstate transportation” of a prostitute. However, neither “Client 9”, nor Spitzer, have been charged with any crime.

http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&aid=79285


42 posted on 03/10/2008 4:59:06 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982
take out hypocrisy and I have ZERO problems with this. Demand meet supply. If it immoral to someone, they should not get involved in it.

Go ahead hit me...

Welcome to FR. Thwack!

I suppose you have no problem with bribery, money laundering and the mob either.

Get back to DU troll. The crowd with no morals deserves you.

43 posted on 03/10/2008 5:00:52 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Eliot John Sptizer...


44 posted on 03/10/2008 5:05:08 PM PDT by El Conservador ("Liberalism is the application of childish emotion to complex issues." - MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: prometheus1982

In case you haven’t noticed, this goes a little deeper than prostitution.


46 posted on 03/10/2008 5:23:06 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: prometheus1982

Um no. Read a little. It’s all here if you’re willing to open your eyes.


48 posted on 03/10/2008 5:28:44 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Doesn’t this also violate the Mann Act?

Don’t know, ask Mann Cow.


49 posted on 03/10/2008 5:34:22 PM PDT by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: prometheus1982

Nah. I’m not going to hit you. You’ve already outed yourself as one who has no problem with men paying for sex be they rich and powerful or some strung out junkie spreading disease...or any married man in between who meets up with the pro after the junkie (or Spitszer for THAT matter) and takes a little “present” home to the wife and children.

I doubt you have a wife, and if you did, I’m certain she’d not take to this public humiliation kindly, and would beat your head with a frying pan once her test results came back positive.

You’ve only been here since March 4th, Troll. Take a hike.


50 posted on 03/10/2008 5:47:40 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson