Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paulson urges banks to raise more capital
FT ^ | 03/13/08 | Krishna Guha and James Politi

Posted on 03/13/2008 9:51:17 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Paulson urges banks to raise more capital

By Krishna Guha and James Politi in Washington

Published: March 13 2008 15:42 | Last updated: March 13 2008 15:42

Hank Paulson on Thursday called on financial institutions to raise more capital and reduce their dividends in order to strengthen their balance sheets as he set out the US government’s regulatory response to the credit crisis.

The US Treasury secretary backed plans to make it easier for banks to issue “covered bonds” to finance mortgages kept on their own books as an alternative to selling them on to investors as mortgage-backed securities.

He said the Treasury was aware that “a number of hedge funds are now facing difficulty” and was monitoring the sector closely.

“We are encouraging financial institutions to continue to strengthen balance sheets by raising capital and revisiting dividend policies,” Mr Paulson said. “We need these institutions to continue to lend and facilitate economic growth.”

He laid out a set of policy recommendations designed to avoid a repetition of the credit crisis that was expansive in scope, but rejected calls for regulators to break up credit-rating agencies, force banks originating mortgage-backed securities to maintain a stake in the securities they issue, or regulate bankers’ pay.

Rather than single out the rating agencies as the culprits of the credit crisis, Mr Paulson argued that all participants in the financial system – including investors and regulators – had contributed to the debacle and had to change their practices.

“There is no single simple solution to the problems that have emerged from the mortgage securitisation process,” Mr Paulson said. “Yet we have determined that market participants’ behaviour must change.”

US regulators had concluded that mortgage brokers need to be subject to a nationwide licensing system and tougher nationwide enforcement.

Credit-rating agencies would be required to disclose conflicts of interest and distinguish more clearly between the ratings they gave to structured credit products and ordinary debt.

Issuers of mortgage securities would have to provide additional information as to the extent of the due diligence they perform on loans that they bundle up and sell on to investors. Investors would have to improve risk management practices and rely less on credit ratings.

Regulators, meanwhile, would review the way in which credit ratings are embedded in regulations, and “at a minimum” would distinguish in regulations between similarly rated structured credit products and ordinary debt.

Banking regulators will revisit Basle 2 bank capital rules to make sure they deal appropriately with bank’s off-balance-sheet exposures to vehicles such as conduits and structured investment vehicles (SIVs) and strengthen guidance on liquidity risk.

Mr Paulson also called for the creation of a “dedicated industry co-operative” to improve market infrastructure in the over-the-counter derivatives market, similar to the existing Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, that would promote standardisation of OTC products and more efficient settlement.

The Treasury secretary said that ultimately, the top management of financial groups was responsible for managing their risks and establishing the correct incentives for decision-makers. He rejected a role for government in this, saying the market would deliver the right outcomes.

Meanwhile, Barney Frank, chairman of the House financial services committee, proposed new legislation that would permit the Federal Housing Administration to provide up to $300bn to help troubling borrowers refinance their mortgages and avoid foreclosure.

Mr Frank claimed the proposal could lead to the refinancing of between 1m and 2m mortgages. Lenders would have to accept a substantial write-down of the value of the mortgage, in exchange for a payment from the new FHA loan.

The bill aims to tackle the problem of ”negative equity”, where the value of a borrower’s home is lower than the mortgage. Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve chairman, last week highlighted the problem, urging banks to forgive chunks of loans to troubled borrowers.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: capital; dividend; paulson

1 posted on 03/13/2008 9:51:18 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg
I guess he no longer has time to leisurely pursue strategic dialogues with Chinese regime.:-)
2 posted on 03/13/2008 9:52:46 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

What? The printing machine broke?


3 posted on 03/13/2008 9:53:25 AM PDT by The_Republican (You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
No, he is afraid that the price of upscale hookers in NYC could become too expensive if he keeps printing out money.
4 posted on 03/13/2008 9:56:11 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

>> “a number of hedge funds are now facing difficulty”

Then maybe, just maybe, they should FAIL.

Maybe, just maybe, losers who invested money in them should LOSE IT.

Maybe... just possibly, know what I’m saying?... it’s THEIR PROBLEM, not the Fed’s, not the taxpayer’s.

Just a thought.


5 posted on 03/13/2008 9:58:12 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I'm not voting FOR John McCain -- I'm voting AGAINST Hillary/Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

It does appear the govt is taking all of the fun out of speculation these days


6 posted on 03/13/2008 10:04:44 AM PDT by SF Republican (Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
These folks should be talking about diving from the top of a high-rise building.
7 posted on 03/13/2008 10:07:02 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

How are they supposed to do that? Lock the Money Fairy in the vault overnight?


8 posted on 03/13/2008 10:07:19 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

>> It does appear the govt is taking all of the fun out of speculation these days

Well, there’s always the casinos...


9 posted on 03/13/2008 10:07:59 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I'm not voting FOR John McCain -- I'm voting AGAINST Hillary/Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
If that fails, there is always a Russian roulette. The last man standing walks out with everybody's money.
10 posted on 03/13/2008 10:10:07 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

>> If that fails, there is always a Russian roulette.

Messy, but final, and the outcome can’t be disputed!


11 posted on 03/13/2008 10:24:46 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I'm not voting FOR John McCain -- I'm voting AGAINST Hillary/Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Speaaking of ways banks could get better balance sheets:

1.Reduce exec pay from hundreds of millions and cut out golden parachutes.

2.Put photos on all credit cards at bank expense, reducing fraudulent use by hundreds of millions per year. You can get a photo on your card now—if you are willing to pay for it. Does that make sense.


12 posted on 03/13/2008 10:44:31 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

While I agree with your sentiment, I would just NB for you that many public and private pension funds are now invested in hedge funds.

If the public pension funds lose significant amounts of money due to hedge fund margin call collapse, guess who is going to pay for that?

You and me and all other taxpayers.


13 posted on 03/13/2008 11:31:02 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Good point. Banks also lend to hedgies. Would not be good for the USA if significant number of banks go under. Especially considering the FDIC doesn’t have enough money.


14 posted on 03/13/2008 12:05:52 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Hillary! Best advice to you HRC is get ppl to diss Michelle in a racial way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Heard there are over 104,000 very wealthy foreigners waiting in line to help the banks raise capital as the banks have decide to turn around and issue $10k limit credit cards to 4 year olds that are at least potty-trained and can talk for the next boom-bubble-bust Ponzi scheme.


15 posted on 03/13/2008 5:03:06 PM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson