Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reconquista Mexican Consulate Claims US belongs to Mexico!
Youtube ^ | March 14, 2008 | ALIPAC1

Posted on 03/15/2008 7:16:21 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HSgbeTegko

There are other videos regarding this incident as well.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: albertolozanomerino; aliens; aztlan; ca; california; consulate; deathofthewest; invaders; invasion; laraza; lareconquista; mexico; minutemen; reconquista; sandiego; stateofemergency; theeseesourland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last
This is NOT your land, pendejo!
1 posted on 03/15/2008 7:16:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; ...

PING!


2 posted on 03/15/2008 7:17:28 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cloverfield 2008! Why vote for a lesser monster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I’d have decked the smug bastard.


3 posted on 03/15/2008 7:18:19 PM PDT by RockinRight (Supreme Court Justice Fred Thompson. The next best place for Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

There’s a reason that San Diego is a world-class city, and Tijuana is a third world hellhole.

Because the United States of America and it’s people and system of government, despite our many flaws, is far superior to the neo-feudalist system that runs that sh*thole of a nation to our south.

Why do you think they’re trying to come here?


4 posted on 03/15/2008 7:22:06 PM PDT by RockinRight (Supreme Court Justice Fred Thompson. The next best place for Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
pardon me for reminding everyone, more than 2 years ago, that Los Estados Unidos de Azatlan would be founded after a vote (within my lifetime) of the MAJORITY Hispanic/Roman Catholic populous, would take AZ,CA,CO,NM,NV,OR & WA out of the union???

the FACTS are that this incident is the FIRST STEP toward that goal.

free dixie,sw

5 posted on 03/15/2008 7:23:49 PM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

bttt


6 posted on 03/15/2008 7:23:57 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (And smale foweles maken melodye.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Wont the French and English have something to say about that.


7 posted on 03/15/2008 7:24:53 PM PDT by svcw (The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Could be the Indians may get a little testy.


8 posted on 03/15/2008 7:25:51 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Wow, that’s eye-opening.

If our State Department was worth spit, that guy would be declared persona non grata and sent home post haste.


9 posted on 03/15/2008 7:33:10 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Well stated! BUMP-TO-THE-TOP!


10 posted on 03/15/2008 7:33:28 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Good for them. If I lived in Mexico I'd try and steal another country too.
11 posted on 03/15/2008 7:33:42 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

True!


12 posted on 03/15/2008 7:34:06 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: berdie

I’d ask the Indians in Riverside and San Diego County if they consider themselves Mexican, but I don’t want to make enemies.


13 posted on 03/15/2008 7:36:04 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
FROM MECHA's website:

WHAT IS AZTLAN?

http://www.mayorno.com/WhoIsMecha.html

http://www.americanpatrol.com/MECHA/MEChAindex.html

14 posted on 03/15/2008 7:37:59 PM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Isn't multiculturalism great?


15 posted on 03/15/2008 7:43:52 PM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Spread the word. “Reconquista” really means “Conquista” - this land was NEVER the property of these felons who want to steal it. Any more than Kuwait was “part of Iraq”.

For the historically inclined, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo which transferred most of what is now the American Southwest to the USA was the end result of extreme bad faith on the part of Mexico. Mexico OPENLY INVITED Americans to settle in what is now Texas, (then quite empty), but then began to oppress them without mercy. To the point where they rose up and declared independence, which it was their God-given right to do. Fought a war to win it, too. Their independence was recognized by several European states, as well as the USA. After ten years or so passed, Texas petitioned to be admitted to the United States. Mexico started a war over THAT, and the US won convincingly. The USA COULD have said “screw you” and annexed the whole bloody country, but instead we paid Mexico a whopping sum of money for the land, and also assumed all of the debts owed by the Mexican government to the Texans, which was almost as much again. What is now the American Southwest was BOUGHT, not conquered, and belongs to the USA by right, plain as the nose on your face. Make sure everyone you know knows it!


16 posted on 03/15/2008 7:47:15 PM PDT by Supercharged Merlin (Only way to get the money out of politics is to get the politics out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
frankly, i think it more likely that Los Estados Unidos de Azatlan will NOT become part of "Greater Mexico", but will be a separate nation.

btw, WHERE do you suppose the "HOLLYWEIRD smut-peddlers" will move their operations to??? (my experience is that Roman Catholic countries in Latin America are UN-friendly to pornographers/FILTH. most of "the wild floor shows" in Mexico are LESS risque than those in Las Vegas.)

free dixie,sw

17 posted on 03/15/2008 7:48:29 PM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

“Why do you think they’re trying to come here?”

Because we stole all the land with the best roads, hospitals, schools, businesses, the best cities, the best government, and the best homes. You know how us gringos are.


18 posted on 03/15/2008 7:50:14 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Image hosted by Photobucket.com they took it from the INDIANS... we took it from THEM.

you can take anything you want in this world... question is, can you keep it???

as you said, pound sand pendejo.

19 posted on 03/15/2008 7:57:36 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Anyone know if McCain agrees?


20 posted on 03/15/2008 8:07:00 PM PDT by donna ("Women are not little men, and men are not big women.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
"... the United States of America and it’s people and system of government, despite our many flaws, is far superior to the neo-feudalist system that runs that sh*thole of a nation to our south."

Nicely put.

You should patent that, or copyright it, and sell it on bumperstickers -
I'll buy the first one, and I'll p*ss on anyone who doesn't like it!

21 posted on 03/15/2008 8:18:11 PM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

If Texas was still Mexican, San Antonio would have dirt streets.... Enough said, they can pound their sand..


22 posted on 03/15/2008 8:20:54 PM PDT by ThomasPaine2000 (Peace without freedom is tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Hey Senor Merino:

finger2
"UP YOUR CULO, PUTO"

23 posted on 03/15/2008 8:26:08 PM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Why? Arbusto Bush agrees witth him.


24 posted on 03/15/2008 8:38:38 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Supercharged Merlin

Your description of the history of the Mexican War is at best one-sided, completely ignoring those aspects that reflect less well on America.

A great many prominent Americans at the time believed the US to be in the wrong on the war, including Lincoln, US Grant and many other military officers, Thoreau, ex-president John Quincy Adams and essentially all abolitionists.

Nevertheless, Mexico controlled the area (very loosely) for less than 25 years. The US has controlled it for closing on 200 years at this point. It is ludicrous to claim that legitimate title has not transferred.


25 posted on 03/15/2008 8:39:58 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

No chingas con los estados unidos!


26 posted on 03/15/2008 8:40:16 PM PDT by Keith Brown (Among the other evils being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised Machiavelli.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
*snort* Mexico never had any legal presence in this country, even after it had taken over control of its own country from Spain. Those Spanish speaking people who lived in areas that had been owned by Spain, now techinically owned by Mexico, were the descendants of Spaniards, they were NOT descendents of the Aztecs or Mestizos or any of the other indigenous tribes in Mexico which had been conquered by Spain. Mexico never placed any troops in areas in which Spanish speaking people lived, in order to help with their security, or project power, so those Spaniards never considered themselves 'Mexicans'.

This is what's so humorous about the Reconquista movement; they don't even know their own history, they've just made up something that fits their agenda.

27 posted on 03/15/2008 8:47:28 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Have you had a chance to read Travis McGee’s books? The second one deals with Azatlan.


28 posted on 03/15/2008 8:47:40 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory. - George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chode; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
you can take anything you want in this world... question is, can you keep it???

More to the point, WILL we? At the very least we could learn some lessons from history...

From The Beginning of the End:

Despite the 1830 decree to halt immigration, between 1830 and 1835 as many as 10,000 U. S. citizens entered Texas illegally, and more than a few were spoiling for a fight. Even [Stephen F.]Austin, the go-along to get-along empresario, had a change of heart and mind in Mexico. After his release from prison in July, 1835, Austin penned a letter in New Orleans to a cousin:

"A great immigration from Kentucky, Tennessee, etc., each man with his rifle… would be of great use to us—very great indeed… I wish a great immigration this fall and winter from Kentucky, Tennessee, everywhere; passports or no passports, anyhow. For fourteen years I have had a hard time of it, but nothing shall daunt my courage or abate my exertitions to complete the main object of my labors to Americanize Texas. This fall and winter will fix our fate—a great immigration will settle the question." Although Austin was five years behind the invasion plan, he was, at last, on board and the Texas Revolution had begun.

So, Texas belongs to the US now. The US bought, bartered, swapped and traded for it; fought and won it when it became necessary. Obviously, groups like MEChA and their ilk's job is to sew seeds of discontent wherever possible. Probably aided and abetted by the likes of a George Soros. Chavez maybe???

29 posted on 03/15/2008 9:17:45 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

YUP.

Except that the globalists are determined to have one of their 10 regional kingdoms comprise the North American Union as one “pseudo-country” in the world government.


30 posted on 03/15/2008 9:24:33 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This is the map the Mexican government should've handed out. FIFO.


31 posted on 03/15/2008 9:34:20 PM PDT by OeOeO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

It’s a good thing that Mexican troops started the war, then, isn’t it? They over-ran a small US outpost and then started to move towards a larger one near the coast. This was after a new Mexican government repudiated the terms of a treaty they had agreed to earlier under a different dictator, and they had refused further negotiations with the US over the Tex-Mex border sticking point. Whether or not that was worth the full-scale war that soon came might be debated, but at the time, it was a good enough reason for Congress to declare war.


32 posted on 03/15/2008 10:49:09 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("Ah! but it was something to have at least a choice of nightmares.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

You mean the whole enchilada?


33 posted on 03/15/2008 10:50:25 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("History is not just cruel. It is witty." ~Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Isnt this speshall ???

And mind-blowing...

He’s like the Speedy Gonzales fellow that Terry Anderson plays on Sunday nights

“Go back to the Plyumouth Rock”


34 posted on 03/15/2008 11:40:24 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

This is again a very incomplete story.

I assume the “treaty” you speak of is the one Santa Ana made after his capture. It was never ratified by the Mexican Congress and did not have any validity under international law as agreements made by prisoners under duress are not considered valid.

The land between the Nueces and the Rio Grande was disputed. Texas and the US claimed the Rio as the border, while Mexico claimed the Nueces.

When the new president, Polk, entered office he ordered the US Army to occupy the disputed territory, which the Mexicans considered theirs. When the Mexicans attacked to evict the invaders, he reported to Congress that American troops had been killed on American soil.

While there was no doubt that American troops had been killed, it required a good deal of spinning to assert with a straight face that it was “on American soil.” Lincoln’s most famous speech during his sole term in Congress was to demand that Polk prove that the spot where the troops died was American soil at the time.

Of course the Mexicans refused to negotiate over the border. They had never recognized the validity of Texan independence and still viewed it as a Mexican province in rebellion.

While Congress declared war, it was widely considered by
Whigs and northerners to be the result of a proslavery conspiracy seeking land to expand the institution.

The Mexicans behaved very stupidly in the runup to the war and there was plenty of fault on both sides, but it is just inaccurate to refer to the Mexican War as an American response to Mexican aggression.


35 posted on 03/16/2008 6:15:59 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

This is again a very incomplete story.

I assume the “treaty” you speak of is the one Santa Ana made after his capture. It was never ratified by the Mexican Congress and did not have any validity under international law as agreements made by prisoners under duress are not considered valid.

The land between the Nueces and the Rio Grande was disputed. Texas and the US claimed the Rio as the border, while Mexico claimed the Nueces.

When the new president, Polk, entered office he ordered the US Army to occupy the disputed territory, which the Mexicans considered theirs. When the Mexicans attacked to evict the invaders, he reported to Congress that American troops had been killed on American soil.

While there was no doubt that American troops had been killed, it required a good deal of spinning to assert with a straight face that it was “on American soil.” Lincoln’s most famous speech during his sole term in Congress was to demand that Polk prove that the spot where the troops died was American soil at the time.

Of course the Mexicans refused to negotiate over the border. They had never recognized the validity of Texan independence and still viewed it as a Mexican province in rebellion.

While Congress declared war, it was widely considered by
Whigs and northerners to be the result of a proslavery conspiracy seeking land to expand the institution.

The Mexicans behaved very stupidly in the runup to the war and there was plenty of fault on both sides, but it is just inaccurate to refer to the Mexican War as an American response to Mexican aggression.


36 posted on 03/16/2008 6:16:01 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Chavez thinks himself the new Che...


37 posted on 03/16/2008 6:52:26 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Part of his description was the war of Texas Independence. In addition to the American settlers, there were also Mexican citiznes who joined in that battle. The fact is, the Mexican constitution of October 1824 was something most (Anglo and Mexican) were willing to abide...but Sanata Anna nixed all of that in 1835 which led to the revolution.

After Texas Independence, the war with Mexico was almost a foegone conclusion if Mexico in any way physically objected to Texas statehood, trying to claim the disputed border, or in any other way.

Sorry, it may not seem fair to some today, but to those along that border at the time, who were contending with Mexican incursions, Apache and Commanche, it was very serious.

That two year war, though the relative strengths of the two nations was one sided, was not so one sided in and of irself. The US forces invading Mexico were much smaller than the Mexican Armies they faced, and they were about equally armed. In most cases you had smaller US forces attacking well defended, fortifications manned by larger numbers. What that smaller force accomplished is fairly amazing on its face.

The bottom line? The Mexicans lost. US troops occupied their capitol in Mexico City and the Mexican government ultimately signed the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. That's the bottom line. it was signed in 1848 and allowed the US to take possession of the current US southwest, which the US paid the Mexican government millions of dollars for, and which also guarunteed Mexican citizens who were cauight up in the exchane their property rights in the new territories if they elected to stay. Most did.

The land was very loosley controlled by the Mexican government at the time (with the exception of Santa Fe perhaps and the lower California coast) and mostly empty.

A comparison of the relative prosperity, freedom, and rights, and peace of the two seperate areas today (those lands ceded and the rest of Mexico) tells us which region benefited most.

What the re-Conquista movement is proposing would not only be terrible for the citizens in the areas...it would quite simply lead to a bloody, ut fairly short war...with the same outcome as 1848. property ownership.

38 posted on 03/16/2008 7:41:33 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson
no, i have not.

there are so many books out there that i haven't even seen them.

free dixie,sw

39 posted on 03/16/2008 7:46:12 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I agree with most of what you say.

I would like to add that during the period of Texas Independence the raiding went both ways. It wasn’t just Mexicans raiding innocent peaceful Texans. Rangers and other Texans raided innocent peaceful Mexicans.

My critique is not based on revisionist history but rather on criticisms of the justice of the war that were put forward at the time.

But, as you say, it is ludicrous to propose the “return” of these areas to Mexican control.


40 posted on 03/16/2008 7:50:04 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Quix
the globalists certainly WANT that situation, but i believe that eventually the globalists will "fall on their sword".

free dixie,sw

41 posted on 03/16/2008 7:50:11 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Chode
inasmuch as Che was a FAILURE as a revolutionary/leader, perhaps Chavez is correct.

i've lived in Venezuela & i do not foresee him being in power much longer. he is NOT particuliarly popular with those who REALLY run things there.

free dixie,sw

42 posted on 03/16/2008 7:53:27 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Certainly they will meet their due end in due course . . . though not before up to 2/3 of the world’s population has been destroyed.

Actually,

they will fall on

Christ’s sword

at Armageddon.

Scripture teaches that they will be more or less in overt charge of all the nations of the world for at least 3.5 years—maybe 7 years.


43 posted on 03/16/2008 7:56:50 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Naw.

don’t waste the transportation . . .

stick him in a circus canon and shoot him over the border off San Diego to off the coast of Baja . . . preferably amidst a bunch of hungry great white’s.


44 posted on 03/16/2008 7:58:18 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

You are so right. Mexico was not able to support the Spanish colonists here in order to back up any real claim. Mexican supply trains headed up into NM were regularly attacked by indians, and there was so much chaos in Mexico it became all but impossible to supply the Spanish up here. The colonists here in NM were very much on their own until the Santa Fe trail began to supply them with goods from the United States. Colonists became dependent on the supplies from the U.S. to the point that when the U.S. military moved in to take possession of this part of the Southwest there was little to no resistance- more like a shrug and so what.


45 posted on 03/16/2008 8:00:52 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Un freakin' believable.

And still, the majority of Americans choose to be comfortably ignorant of the threat the invasion from Mexico poses.

Wake up, people - before it's too late!
46 posted on 03/16/2008 8:03:55 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (feh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix
and you find this information exactly where???

free dixie,sw

47 posted on 03/16/2008 8:15:20 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

Much in Revelation at the end of the New Testament.

But check out also Daniel 9-10 and Ezekiel 38 . . . several chapters thereabouts in Ezekiel.

Those all are not specifically on those points but I think it takes all those Scriptures to get the best over all view of what’s coming down the pike.

Have you seen

THE ENDGAME movie?

Go to

HTTP://WWW.ABOVETOPSECRET.COM

At the top of the screen is a button to click on to view it. It’s easier at ATS than at the ENDGAME website. That gives you a good overview of the Globalists efforts and goals—which are quite in keeping with what Scripture says they will be.

Perhaps others will have more specific Scriptures too look up for you.

John F Walvoord’s EVERY PROPHECY OF THE BIBLE goes over every prophecy including the END TIMES prophecies better than anyone else I know—discussing all the views but coming down decidedly with these as the obvious end times described in Scripture—and fitting only our time, none other.

He’s passed away a few years ago but is the recognized dean of experts on such matters.

Sorry I don’t have an easier answer handy for you.

You might try CBN’s website as well as THE ELIJAH LIST.

If I carve out more time for such later today, maybe I can give a better answer.

Thanks for asking.


48 posted on 03/16/2008 8:25:17 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Quix
fwiw, i'm a "parochial school product" (with numerous college courses in religion) & i'll frankly tell you that i do NOT understand Revelations.

thanks.

free dixie,sw

49 posted on 03/16/2008 8:35:13 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God. Thomas Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Image hosted by Photobucket.comdo you know if Westinghouse or it's successors still had any plants down there when you were there?
50 posted on 03/16/2008 8:35:49 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson