To: Clintonfatigued
I’m no eco-maniac, but this is inexcusable.No, it's not. It's called repositioning. The plane has to be where the schedule says it needs to be. British Airways paid for the fuel and lost revenue with empty seats. Capitalism can be cruel at times. It didn't cost the rest of us a dime. And as far as carbon in the atmosphere, I couldn't care less.
12 posted on
03/16/2008 6:52:22 PM PDT by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: buccaneer81
Any complaints from the shareholders?
52 posted on
03/16/2008 8:17:02 PM PDT by
glorgau
To: buccaneer81
“It didn't cost the rest of us a dime. And as far as carbon in the atmosphere, I couldn't care less.”
LOL! Thats the spirit!
On the other hand one jet flying algore anywhere is a useless waste of fuel.
64 posted on
03/16/2008 8:56:14 PM PDT by
JSteff
( This election is about the 4 or 5 Supreme Court Justices who will retire . Vote Accordingly!)
To: buccaneer81
No, it's not. It's called repositioning. I had that happen to me once. I was on my way back from Alaska and the airline I had tickets for went on strike. I was at SEATAC. After a 12 hour wait, a connection was found in Portland for me and they had to shuttle a 747 with crew down there. I was the only passenger on that flight with 12 stewardesses.
88 posted on
03/17/2008 3:02:37 PM PDT by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagon)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson