Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh’s Objective: Defeat McCain At Any Cost
March 19 2008
| jveritas
Posted on 03/19/2008 5:57:09 AM PDT by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-236 next last
To: DManA
Limbaugh is mistaken. The support of Obama was always tenuous, the reason he won in VA was I and many Republicans like me (anti-Hillary vote). Hillary did not need Rush’s help, but he will benefit greatly from her victory.
41
posted on
03/19/2008 6:09:20 AM PDT
by
palmer
To: jveritas
You officially qualify as a Super Delegate in the Democrat party.
This emotional rants is totally devoid of any logic.
42
posted on
03/19/2008 6:09:36 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
(Congratulations Evangelicals for getting John McCain nominated.)
To: jveritas
Put down the mouse and back s-l-o-w-l-y away from the keyboard..................
43
posted on
03/19/2008 6:09:49 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: jveritas
Well, ya know, no matter who gets elected, we’re gonna have a Democrat in the Whitehouse.
Might as well have some fun with them while we can.
And, if the Democrat Party is split and race-riots interrupt the DNC convetion, that would be nice, too.
44
posted on
03/19/2008 6:09:57 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(It is time to drink the KoolAid: McCain for President!)
To: jveritas
BS
Rush wants to see the Dims tear themselves apart. Best way to do that is to keep both of them in the race for the nomination, 'keep the soap-opera going'.
Because whoever wins for the Dims will be damaged goods, have little time to garner cash, and even spend more winning the nomination, and depleting those funds for the general.
45
posted on
03/19/2008 6:11:15 AM PDT
by
Pistolshot
(Remember, no matter how bad your life is, someone is watching and enjoying your suffering.)
To: dead
46
posted on
03/19/2008 6:11:33 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: jveritas
Limbaugh's biggest fault was never to recognize ROTham Clinton as the bigger of the two DemocRAT evils.
As far as McCain goes, he was NEVER the choice of the base... BUT NO ONE ELSE WAS EITHER. McCain won by getting Independent, cross-over-Dem and Fred Barnes-style, Republican votes. Combine that with the evangelicals deserting conservative candidates for a populist... and you see how we got screwed.
47
posted on
03/19/2008 6:12:02 AM PDT
by
johnny7
To: jveritas
48
posted on
03/19/2008 6:12:40 AM PDT
by
caver
(Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
To: palmer
Hillary did not need Rushs help, but he will benefit greatly from her victory.
The ignorance of this line of thinking is astounding.
Do you have any idea how obscenely wealthy Rush Limbauh is now? Do you know that he is at the top of the Talk Radio heap regardless of which party is in power?
Rush Limbaugh has nothing to gain from the country he loves and serves being led by a Socialist and THAT IS NOT HIS GOAL OR DESIRE.
49
posted on
03/19/2008 6:13:07 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
(Congratulations Evangelicals for getting John McCain nominated.)
To: elizabetty
For a long time, it has been liberalism, characterized by a “party orthodoxy” - whose adherents brook no disagreement.
The party orthodoxy is to be believed. It is defended emotionally, and the slightest challenge to that orthodoxy is grounds for name-calling, and accusations of having joined the opposition.
The only people this poster sees on this board, acting that way, are those who for whatever reason, hate (yes hate) John McCain.
To: Vaquero
Rush speaks of the party winning the election, and gloats at the Dims who are in the process of eating their own. Since I have never once listened to Rush, I am in a fair position to evaluate his logic. Rush is wrong on all counts. The Dems will win this election no matter who their nominee is. The Dems are not fighting except superficially. Hillary is a much stronger candidate than Obama mainly because her positive supporters (About 40%) will definitely be voting in November and her negative nonsupporters (including Rush's audience) may or may not show up to vote against her.
51
posted on
03/19/2008 6:13:29 AM PDT
by
palmer
To: jveritas
And just why is that a bad thing? ... if that were true, of course.
52
posted on
03/19/2008 6:13:56 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(The tree of liberty has been overrun by bushes)
To: jveritas
I agree with you. Rush hates McCain and he knows that Hillary would be good fodder for his talk show.
I have quit listening to his program but I saw someone post on here that he has been saying, “Heck, we may get Hillary for President, but didn’t we have fun in the process”
How stupid is that. Folks, Rush is playing you for fools and you don’t even know it.
53
posted on
03/19/2008 6:13:57 AM PDT
by
ClarenceThomasfan
(Rush wouldn't lift a finger to help Fred or Duncan, yet he shills for Hillary. Rush is a fat idiot.)
To: jveritas
هراء
54
posted on
03/19/2008 6:14:06 AM PDT
by
kanawa
(Don't go where you're looking, look where you're going.)
To: jveritas
Lars: “Ole, stant in front of my car and tell me if da turn signals are working.”
Ole: “Yes, No, Yes, No, Yes, No, Yes, No...”
To: elizabetty
Do you have any idea how obscenely wealthy Rush Limbauh is now? Do you have any idea when Rush gathered much of his listenership?
56
posted on
03/19/2008 6:15:00 AM PDT
by
palmer
To: Conservative Vermont Vet; jveritas
Jveritas has been here since 2001 and you claim “code Pink” is the group supported??? You have been here since 2008...wow big difference. If you don't agree than explain that you don't agree and why. Why insult?????
To: jveritas
Total BS.
Limbaugh WANTS McCain to win, as he's the least shitty of the 3 possible evils.
I'll even go so far as to say the civil war Rush started in the rat party is probably the ONLY thing that gets McCain elected.
A strong and united rat party would beat RINO McCain like a drum, no matter who they run against him.
58
posted on
03/19/2008 6:15:58 AM PDT
by
Slump Tester
(Only CINOs and democRATs knowingly and willingly vote for RINOs!)
To: palmer
Since I have never once listened to Rush, I am in a fair position to evaluate his logic. Rush is wrong on all counts. The Dems will win this election no matter who their nominee is. The Dems are not fighting except superficially. Hillary is a much stronger candidate than Obama mainly because her positive supporters (About 40%) will definitely be voting in November and her negative nonsupporters (including Rush's audience) may or may not show up to vote against her. LOL You have never listened and you can evaluate his logic... Are you a drive-by media guy????
59
posted on
03/19/2008 6:17:12 AM PDT
by
Just mythoughts
(Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
To: jveritas
That, my good friend,is a whole load of BS.
60
posted on
03/19/2008 6:17:26 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-236 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson