In fact, every measurable piece of data on weather and the environment proves there's Global Warming. By definition.
That leaves all you deniers with no leg to stand on. Literally.
That has got to be the all-time champion for a non-sensical statement; at least in the English language.
As for the actual controversy, it is useful for the alarmists to mix everything together to confuse and confound (just like they doctor the data); the "controversy", for lack of a better word is two-fold.
1. That global warming is real (no rational person denies it, and it's happened dozens of times in the past independent of man, by definition. Primitive man could not possibly have had a role in that until the last 4000 years). Only an idiot would continue flogging that dead horse.
2. The anthropogenic nature of the current trend. Here there is unlimited room for honest differences of opinion, based on the data, the incompetent "massaging" of the data by questionable "scientists", and the very primitive nature of the data that underlies their opinions. Some of the most loud and hysterical proponents of anthropogenic global warming still insist on using unreliable observed data (the documentation is extensive), or the primitive satellite data of 50 years ago (!).
Keep pretending that you don't understand the nature of #2, and keep screaming about #1, since that is the only leg that the one-legged doomsday artists can get traction with.