Posted on 03/25/2008 6:48:06 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
Hillary, with bayonet tightly between her teeth, advanced with Chelsea beside her towards the grim genocidiers in Tuzla. Her heart beat with sanguine bravery, as she prepared to cut down the screaming, pseudo-sapient madmen standing between Yugoslavians and free health care. It was a pivotal moment for the future of dumbocracy, and it was total, unmitigated male bovine scatology.
There are those who think she misspoke, others who believe she exaggerated a tad, and still others, such as myself, who thinks she could open her mouth and fertilize an entire ethanol farm without substantially raising her pulse. Well, that’s why she hires James Carville to go on Good Morning America and spin. He makes anything obnoxious or disingenuous that pops out of her mouth pale in comparison.
He celebrated Holy Week by blaspheming over the unsubstantial topic of Governor Bill Richardson endorsing Barack Obama. He offered us the following mendacious abuse of the scriptures.
“Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic,” Mr. Carville said, referring to Holy Week.
While Carville and Clinton both treat the truth the way New York Governors treat the institution of holy matrimony, it’s Clinton who should take a page from her opponent’s playbook, and go off the air for an island vacation. Her body could use a rest and her mouth and brain could both use a hiatus until they resynchronize.
Claims of braving incoming sniper fire in Bosnia have made her the DNC version of Congressman Wes Cooley. It’s the type of thing that just gets seared on a person’s memory.
So Carville again served as Hillary’s one-man insane clown posse on GMA. He managed to veer into uncharted territory that would have piqued the interest of the late Rod Serling. He not only doesn’t apologize to Governor Bill Richardson, he also doesn’t particularly feel that he and the governor will be close in the future.
Carville surmised as much based on Governor Richardson’s response to Carville’s initial insult to his religious faith and his character. Richardson wouldn’t wrestle the muddy, porcine Carville on account of his desire to maintain clean haberdashery.
Richardson told "Fox News Sunday" that he wouldn't respond by getting "in the gutter like that."
"That's typical of many of the people around Senator Clinton," Richardson said. "They think they have a sense of entitlement to the presidency."
After waddling his way through some non-sequitor about New Mexico cattle ranches, Carville got down to the business of channeling his inner sadist. He described his remarks as putting the correct brand on a cow. It was something he just had to be a man and take care of. He repeated this disgusting metaphor as I finished my morning coffee and shut the TV off to escape his pugnacious, ugly mug.
I can only think Carville acts that way intentionally. He believes he can ratchet that jaw up and down and make freakish enough pronouncements to intimidate other Democrats out of supporting Barack Obama or commenting on his pay mistress’ remarkable excursions beyond the boundaries of truth. He’s like the rodeo clown who makes a spectacle of himself to prevent the fallen rider from being trampled and gored. He’s genuinely that sick for a living.
Carville is good at what he does, and it’s a job most Americans have too much dignity and self-respect to do. However, I still believe the man should have worked as a pimp instead. That occupation seems to match his disposition and personality better.
What most professionals consider over the top, pimps consider a Type A personality. Carville couldn’t get more Type A without flying off the edge of the alphabet. His aggression, unfairness and his total disregard for the decency that should prevail in the public square are reflexive and seem hard wired into his being.
Carville is the Jungian archetype of The Hatemonger. With equal malice towards all not named Hillary Clinton, Carville probably assumes that he is a just and equitable man; as opposed to an equal opportunity sleaze-chucker. Carville genuinely defiles American politics, and it works like precision machinery.
Hillary will never know the mortal danger of sniper fire. She will never feel threatened as rounds crack through the Balkan air like miniature spears of lightning; chucked by an angry Zeus. She’s got James Carville to handle the wet work and brand all those wayward cattle afflicted with the audacity to stray from The Clintonian Deceit Ranch. What did America do exactly to deserve a machine like the Clinton model?
There’s a reason why God clearly gave Carville the visage of a snake.
Com’on now, don’t you remember the old days when the Clintons were in the WH? :)
They lied ALL the time.
Telling a lie to them comes as naturally as breathing in and out comes to the rest of us.
They are superb liars.
I might give Carville a bit of a break on the Judas comment. After all, I feel sure he knows nothing of Christianity.
Tell me again how Mary Matalin’s marriage to this vile creature doesn’t say anything about her real core beliefs, convictions, character?
Regarding post #5: That would have been a great line for the movie “Men in Black”.
Must. Not. Answer This. One.
:-X
I don't. I think it is highly insulting, to Judas!
But then again, I take the view that had it not been for the actions of Judas, Pilate, and all of the people who had a direct hand in the Crucifixion, Jesus would have never been crucified, we would have no salvation, and the world would be much worse off for it.
lol
“They lied ALL the time.”
And can you tell me what percentage and which presidents for the past one hundred years have not been pretty good at lying?
What really blows my mind is the Carville marriage. Can anyone explain that?
I respectfully refer you to comment #9.
Carville, though I won’t judge his heart,
presents himself in a manner that makes me think of
evil incarnate, the personification of Satan.
“Had it not been for the actions of Judas...we would have no salvation...”
Have you heard about the recently discovered “gospel of Judas” or something like that, which in fact reports that Jesus arranged for Judas to betray him so the “passion” could be played out? Can anyone post a link?
That's exactly what Carville's been doing all along; pimping the Clintons.
Jesus would have been crucified (punished for our sins) regardless of who did it or who betrayed him, for it was God's sovereign plan.
Also, regardless of the inevitability of the crucifixion, those responsible are still responsible for their decisions.
Hank Hannegraffe examines (and debunks) the “gospel of Judas”.
It was clearly written from the viewpoint of Gnosticism, which was about 300 years later than the events described.
Jesus had to be handed over for crucifixion, but those who did are still responsible for doing so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.