Received this Email from Thomas More Law -- is there any doubt at the political machinations that are being done by both political parties any more?
1 posted on
03/26/2008 11:34:24 AM PDT by
brityank
To: RedRover; jazusamo; xzins; Girlene; freema; darrylsharratt; Shelayne; Lancey Howard; lilycicero; ...
PING !
2 posted on
03/26/2008 11:34:58 AM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: brityank
3 posted on
03/26/2008 11:40:03 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: RedRover; Girlene; xzins; jazusamo; smoothsailing
An Undue Command Influence motion had already been filed on behalf of the combat Marines. I know that SSgt. Wunterich has (or is) filed, and is trying to get Murtha as a 'witness'. Have the other case litigants also filed or considered it?
4 posted on
03/26/2008 11:41:48 AM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: brityank
I have a file on this, although I don't have it handy. I'd thought that most of the charges were dismissed before prosecutions ever occurred?
I could be wrong about that, but if that's the case, I don't think the argument of over-agressive prosecution can hold up. That would indicate the extra bodies were assigned for oversight to make sure there weren't mistakes made.
5 posted on
03/26/2008 11:43:23 AM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: brityank
9 posted on
03/26/2008 12:01:32 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: SandRat; freema; calcowgirl
10 posted on
03/26/2008 12:01:58 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: brityank
The Thomas More Law Center now has this posted on their website as well.
http://www.thomasmore.org/qry/page.taf?id=63
I am deeply troubled by the fact that the desire to appease the liberal anti-war press and politicians has led to the prosecution of innocent Marines for purely political purposes. These prosecutions will become a scandal of historic proportions unless terminated by independently minded and virtuous military judges, commented Thompson.
This is beyond the pale. We've known all along that undue command influence was at work in these Haditha cases, but to learn that it is organised, deliberate, and reachs possibly to the door of the Oval office is mindboggling.
To: brityank
This is some pretty strong stuff, brit. Some of it we've been talking about for some time.
Revelations by top Marine Generals
Curious that they didn't name names of these Generals. Maybe it's to protect them if they're still active service but I'd think they'll have to name them eventually if this goes anywhere.
Gen Mattis decision was overridden by the Navy Secretary,
Winter's name or office has come up often in these cases, too often. He may be the head man but he shouldn't be directing the officers under him how the UCMJ should be applied.
Winter has to be the political influence in these cases, IMO. He's a snake and should be replaced.
12 posted on
03/26/2008 12:08:58 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: brityank
Well, this is certainly interesting. If this is true, the Thomas More Law Center needs these generals to get on record with these allegations. I am confused about Gen. Mattis recommendations being ignored. According to the article,
The Secretary of Navy countermanded a determination by General James Mattis, USMC, that Colonel Stephen Davis, USMC, LtCol Chessanis regimental commander, would receive a Non-Punitive Letter of Caution, which would not be part of his permanent record. Gen Mattis decision was overridden by the Navy Secretary, who ordered a Letter of Censure, a more severe punishment, which effectively ended this fine Marine officers career. As the consolidated convening authority in all the Haditha investigations, General Mattis decision, under normal circumstances, would be absolute and final.
IF that is true, why would Winters go above and beyond Gen. Mattis' recommendations? Here is how it was reported in the
New York Times at the time.
Navy Secretary Donald C. Winter issued letters of censure to Maj. Gen. Richard A. Huck, the commander of the Second Marine Division at the time; Col. R. Gary Sokoloski, who was the divisions lawyer and the chief of staff to General Huck; and Col. Stephen W. Davis, the commander of a regimental combat team that was in charge of the infantry battalion involved in the Haditha episode, on Nov. 19, 2005. ....
.....The letters of censure........were issued after senior generals determined that the three officers had not intended to cover up evidence or acted in a manner that warranted criminal charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Marine Corps said.
..........Letters of censure are issued almost always confidentially. The Marine Corpss decision to announce these censures reflects the enormous interest military leaders have in shaping the public perception that wrongdoing in Iraq, even by senior commanders, will be punished. .......
So that last paragraph does indicate how unusual it was to release these letters and that the military was trying to affect public perception. I don't know,,,,, we need more info. on record to add credence to these allegations. If true, it is VERY troubling.
13 posted on
03/26/2008 12:10:15 PM PDT by
Girlene
To: brityank
Un - freaking - believable.
Somebody needs to sue somebody’s balls off.
I am livid beyond words.
To: brityank
The Thomas More Law Center is doing a great job for these Marines and it is obvious that an Undue Command Influence motion is necessary to preserve LTC Chesani’s rights. However, it is unlikely that the motion will make much of a difference at this stage of trial with it being more of a set-up motion for appeal, should that be necessary. True Command Influence is difficult to overcome at the initial trial court and is usually only remedied in the appeal process. Unfortunate but true.
15 posted on
03/26/2008 12:11:41 PM PDT by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: brityank; RedRover; 4woodenboats; American Cabalist; AmericanYankee; amom; AndrewWalden; ...
Pinging the Haditha Marine list for RedRover, he may be tied up.
18 posted on
03/26/2008 12:24:31 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
To: brityank
I wonder what McCain thinks about this.
To: holdonnow
38 posted on
03/26/2008 2:24:12 PM PDT by
tiredoflaundry
(High Maintenance Estrogen Bot........... look out :0))
To: brityank
49 posted on
03/26/2008 4:47:50 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: brityank; RedRover; jazusamo; xzins; Girlene; freema; darrylsharratt; Shelayne; Lancey Howard; ...
I knew it! All along I knew it.
When everything imaginable turned the prosecutions way, and in spades, then the smart observer was saying, “There’s something fishy here.”
Too good to be true is exactly that.
There is no way that a reasonable person could ever know that this prosecution is not the result of undue command influence.
63 posted on
03/26/2008 7:40:20 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
To: brityank
66 posted on
03/26/2008 8:20:34 PM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
To: USMC Brat
83 posted on
03/29/2008 11:51:22 PM PDT by
USMC Brat
(Set the example.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson