Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Clinton win Texas or not?
NWI Times ^ | March 29, 2008 | by Richard Hatcher

Posted on 03/29/2008 5:15:18 PM PDT by jdm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/29/2008 5:15:19 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm

“She might be right; however, there is a hitch.”

My eyes were blurry — I read that slightly differently the first time.


2 posted on 03/29/2008 5:18:22 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I thought it said “bitch” the first time as well.


3 posted on 03/29/2008 5:21:13 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Clinton is in shock that the Democratic party and the media has already called it for Obama.


4 posted on 03/29/2008 5:21:25 PM PDT by Southerngl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Well, she won the popular vote, so she has the ‘will of the people.’

However, the caucuses were racially biased against her - because the blacks voted against Cankles because she’s white.

So, because of hateful racism that Rev. Wright and most every other ‘black preacher’ would be proud of - the will of the people was overridden.

How democratic. Only from a dimorat does this seem appropriate. No wonder Mrs. Obama is so proud.


5 posted on 03/29/2008 5:22:03 PM PDT by rock_lobsta (Client #10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: jdm

bmfl.


7 posted on 03/29/2008 5:27:58 PM PDT by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rock_lobsta
"because the blacks voted against Cankles because she’s white."

Payback is a *itch for the race party!!

8 posted on 03/29/2008 5:28:37 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Being Challenged Builds Character; Being Coddled Destroys Character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Somewhere along the line you would think that the dolts on the left would be able to figure out the simple act of counting.

Just kidding!


9 posted on 03/29/2008 5:28:59 PM PDT by Howie66 (To the RAT Party: How can I question your patriotism? You have none, so what's your point?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rock_lobsta
However, the caucuses were racially biased against her - because the blacks voted against Cankles because she’s white.

But, but, but...that would mean blacks are racist. And we all know that isn't true because liberal-socialist-communist-treasonous-Democrats have been telling us for 40+ years that only whites are racist.

I'm so confused ;-)

10 posted on 03/29/2008 5:29:21 PM PDT by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Don’t buy The Times of NW Indiana. They underpay, steal story ideas and lie about contracts for freelance writers.


11 posted on 03/29/2008 5:33:00 PM PDT by toddlintown (On Obama's moral compass, "N" doesn't stand for "North.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Another answer....It depends upon the meaning of “win.”


12 posted on 03/29/2008 5:37:40 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Being Challenged Builds Character; Being Coddled Destroys Character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

When the white liberals were eagerly telling blacks that whites were racist and it was okay to hate them, the unwritten understanding is that that didn’t apply to THEM. They were the good whites who would help the blacks out against the bad whites (e.g., anyone not a flaming liberal). Now the blacks are showing their ungratefulness for all the “Help” they’ve gotten from the white liberals all these years. How dare they?!!


13 posted on 03/29/2008 5:39:31 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown
They won't be doing that for long. Newspapers just suffered the largest single year loss of advertising revenue in their history.

The Internet countdown is on.

14 posted on 03/29/2008 6:08:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

ROTFL! Love it!


15 posted on 03/29/2008 6:20:05 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’m sure there will be government bailout soon. ;-(


16 posted on 03/29/2008 6:22:51 PM PDT by doc1019 (God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Southerngl

Obama way ahead in the popular vote (except if you count Florida and Michigan, and the next 10 races where she will make up the gap)-Check

Obama can’t get to the magic number of 2024 either before the convention (even if he wins all of the remaining primaries) and can’t win without the super delegates but Clinton is the one who is hopelessly behind and cant win without super delegates-Check

The Super delegates should vote how their state voted (unless their state voted for Clinton)-Check

Obama was born a muslim, prayed to Mecca as a kid, snorted cocaine, and is a member of a church that is really the Christian wing of the Nation of islum but is more electable than Clinton-Check

Obama stands to lose 7 out of the last 10 contests and hasn’t won a major state- his numbers among white voters and especially white male Reagan democrats are in free fall but Clinton should step aside and hand him the nomination-Check


17 posted on 03/29/2008 6:25:47 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jdm
The Evil One wins the popular vote in the Texas Primary, but Obama gets more Texas delegates. Obama leads in the popular vote of the Democrats primaries and caucuses, yet The Evil One wants the Super Delegates to give her the nomination.

All this from the Democratic Party. It should be renamed the Orwellian Party.

18 posted on 03/29/2008 6:50:00 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Thanks to the rules which apply to only the Democrat Party in Texas, Obama will have won Texas, unless something weird happened at the conventions today.

The party awards more delegates to the victors of districts within the state based on Democrat voter results in the past.

To make the story short, the districts which were predominantly black get more delegates than more racially diverse districts.

Thus, Obama did not win the popular vote in Texas, but he did win more delegates. Ths MSM may have touched on this, but it’s not widely known.


19 posted on 03/29/2008 6:59:27 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jdm
did Clinton actually win Texas?

No... Operation Chaos...RUSH the vote did the 'Texas hold em.'

20 posted on 03/29/2008 7:58:14 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson