Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cell Phones more deadly than Cigarettes? Will higher taxes, insurance premiums and ban be in order?
Associated Content ^ | March 31st, 2008 | Bobby Tall Horse

Posted on 03/31/2008 9:06:53 AM PDT by stillafreemind

Dr. Khurana says there may be broader health ramifications than asbestos or smoking. What? Now just think about that. Again, I foresee a huge higher tax on cell phone use and a higher health and life insurance premium. And maybe people (like me) that don't use cell phones unless its an emergency, would rather not be seated in bars and restaurants where cell phones are in use. Ah, can you say ban?

(Excerpt) Read more at associatedcontent.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancer; cellphones; cigarettes; crackpot; flimflam; health; healthnazis; junkscience; khurana; kookery; nannystate; scaremongering; theskyisfalling; woowoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
This is kind of a different slant on this story. And one wonders.
1 posted on 03/31/2008 9:06:56 AM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

Maybe if the greedy bastiges allowed for a bit more bandwidth we could reduce our time on the phone because we could actually understand what was said instead of say “what”, “say that again”, etc.


2 posted on 03/31/2008 9:11:15 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norraad

Can you hear me now?......


3 posted on 03/31/2008 9:12:00 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

Not only are they more dangerous to cigarettes, they are tougher to light.


4 posted on 03/31/2008 9:12:16 AM PDT by philled (Tá mé, tá tú, tá sé...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norraad

LOL...you have a point there!


5 posted on 03/31/2008 9:12:18 AM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind; Gabz; Eric Blair 2084; 383rr

Ping~


6 posted on 03/31/2008 9:12:35 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

The doc has won awards in 14 of the last 16 years. He knows how to play the system politically, IMHO, and he might just do anything to stay in front of a camera. I suspect the whole thing, starting with the grand statements and no backup in the article.


7 posted on 03/31/2008 9:15:43 AM PDT by Thebaddog (Dog breath? I don't think so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

B.S.


8 posted on 03/31/2008 9:16:38 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

Time for the trial lawyers and their Dem friends to start attacking BIG CELL PHONE.


9 posted on 03/31/2008 9:16:41 AM PDT by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

>>Dr. Khurana says there may be broader health ramifications than asbestos or smoking. What? Now just think about that. Again, I foresee a huge higher tax on cell phone use and a higher health and life insurance premium. And maybe people (like me) that don’t use cell phones unless its an emergency, would rather not be seated in bars and restaurants where cell phones are in use. Ah, can you say ban?<<

The danger is in holder the transmitter so close to the head. I can see a requirement for speaker phones or headsets being bundled.

But the risk can’t be as high as this guy says because we’d see much higher death rates with most of the population using cell pones.


10 posted on 03/31/2008 9:19:03 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

New tax? No good. But if it turns out that cell phones do cause cancer and insurance companies want to charge higher premiums to those who use them, so be it. Also, no public funding for treatment for people who choose to use them and get sick. (Just like there should be no subsidization for treatment for lung cancer, fatties, etc., etc.)


11 posted on 03/31/2008 9:19:05 AM PDT by mngran2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

I wonder if cordless home phones have any effect?


12 posted on 03/31/2008 9:19:52 AM PDT by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

I’ll tell you what, being subjected to “secondhand conversations” of unlimited inanity really does tend to get my blood pressure up. :) I don’t know what it is about three hundred pound women in supermarkets, but seemingly every one of them is glued to their cell phone.


13 posted on 03/31/2008 9:20:49 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind
Put a cell phone next to your desk top computer and see what happens when it rings.
Whatever that is, no doubt that is what is being pumped into your head when you talk on one. If it's as brutal to tissue as it sounds on your PC's circuitry, it can't be healthy. It sure isn't any kind of "normal" static sound I've ever heard before.
14 posted on 03/31/2008 9:21:49 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog

Um, in the comments, Bobby Tall Horse has two links to hit in the article. I hit them both. One took me to a foreign paper and this story. One took me to Dr. Khurana’s website.

I believe the paper is being reviewed by his peers, so it is not published yet. Or that’s my take from reading all three articles.


15 posted on 03/31/2008 9:21:59 AM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: norraad
Maybe if the greedy bastiges allowed for a bit more bandwidth we could reduce our time on the phone because we could actually understand what was said instead of say “what”, “say that again”, etc.

Oh, I hate that!! I almost never talk on the phone because I can't hear a dang thing. I've got about 2,000 roll over minutes because I spend probably 5 minutes a week on the cell. Just enough to call my two best friends and say "Let's meet up in 20 minutes at such-n-such place!" Anything else can wait till we're seated over a nice cold glass of white wine, and can talk like civilized human beings.

16 posted on 03/31/2008 9:22:43 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy

I very infrequently usemy cell, but I plan to sue for secondhand cell transmissions.


17 posted on 03/31/2008 9:24:06 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: catpuppy

See..that’s where I think this slant is interesting.

WILL the Dems go after something that is more harmful than the dreaded cigarette? I’m pretty jaded...I am a smoker. But it would make me laugh my britches off to see cell phone users get treated with the same disrespect as smokers. Just my 2.


18 posted on 03/31/2008 9:24:12 AM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Retired Chemist

I heard someone on FOX talking about that. Yes, they said land line or speaker phone was the safest phone to use.

Hoping someone else heard that and can add more to it!


19 posted on 03/31/2008 9:26:17 AM PDT by stillafreemind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stillafreemind

Personally I find it interesting. A former sister in law died of a brain cancer. The only thing that was different in her life style was that she started doing a nighttime newspaper delivery route. While she was doing the route she was on her cell phone at least 50% of the time. Man that woman could talk and talk.....

Pure anecdotal evidence mind you, so I must say that I find this article interesting.

As for myself I prefer to use a headset connected to the cell phone when I have to use one.


20 posted on 03/31/2008 9:28:06 AM PDT by The Working Man (Any work is better than "welfare"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson