Posted on 04/16/2008 7:28:06 PM PDT by Strategerist
After spending nearly 23 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, Thomas Clifford McGowan on Wednesday heard the words that set him free.
"Words cannot express how sorry I am for the last 23 years," said state District Judge Susan Hawk, moments after overturning his convictions. "I believe you can walk out of here a free man."
McGowan, 49, won his freedom after a DNA test this month proved what he had always professed: that he did not rape a Dallas-area woman in 1985 and then burglarize her apartment. He was convicted of both crimes in separate trials in 1985 and 1986 and sentenced to life each time. The primary evidence against him turned out to be misidentification by the rape victim.
"I've been living a life of a living hell and my nightmare is finally over with," McGowan said after the hearing. "This is the first day of my life. I'm going to go forward."
Hawk's ruling, which now must be affirmed by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, makes McGowan the 17th Dallas man since 2001 to have his conviction cast aside because of DNA testing. That's the most of any county in the nation, according to the Innocence Project, a New York-based legal center that specializes in overturning wrongful convictions.
Overall, 31 people have been formally exonerated through DNA testing in Texas, also a national high. That does not include McGowan and at least two others whose exonerations will not become official until Gov. Rick Perry grants pardons or the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issues its rulings.
The crowded courtroom included dozens of McGowan's relatives. Also attending were three Dallas County men who had been wrongly convicted and eventually exonerated by DNA testing. They greeted McGowan with handshakes and hugs, and one gave him a $100 bill to "get him started."
McGowan, wearing a button-down shirt and slacks, looked trim and relieved. He said he prayed frequently and was benefiting from some "powerful forces." While in prison, one of McGowan's sisters died, and he said he missed watching his sibling's children grow up.
"I know God forgives, so hey, I've got to forgive, too," McGowan said. "It's not going to benefit me to be harboring anger or resentment."
McGowan's wrongful imprisonment began in May 1985 when a Richardson woman returned home and came upon a burglar in her apartment. The man bound her hands with his belt, raped her at knifepoint and then loaded his car with several items stolen from her apartment, according to court documents.
Police eventually presented the woman with a photo array of seven men. She picked out McGowan's photo, saying she "thought" he was the attacker. But police told her she had to be certain and "couldn't just think it was him," she testified in court. It was then that she said McGowan was "definitely" the attacker, according to court documents.
Just a few words from a police officer can significantly influence whether a witness identifies the wrong person, Innocence Project Co-Director Barry Scheck said.
"It's not that the police officer involved in this matter was intentionally doing anything wrong. He wasn't," Scheck said. "That kind of a forced choice response ... is very, very damaging."
More exonerations are expected in Dallas County, where District Attorney Craig Watkins has set up a program in which law students, supervised by the Innocence Project of Texas, are reviewing hundreds of cases in which convicts have requested DNA testing to prove their innocence. About 10 Dallas County cases are in various stages of investigations and DNA testing, and another exoneration is likely within the next few weeks, prosecutors said.
Watkins said he plans to lobby other prosecutors to put in place similar programs.
"This should not be a pilot program that lasts two or three years," Watkins said.
The DNA from McGowan's case yielded a full profile that is now being run through state and federal databases, assistant prosecutor Mike Ware said. If a match is found, it could identify the true rapist.
That’s God’s job - NOT YOURS and NOT GOVERNMENT’S!
to create a world where nations work together,
***
Read his book “Actual Innocence”. He explains several cases like this one.
It will give you chills about our legal system. It opened my eyes.
Oops.
to create a world where nations work together,=Barry Scheck.
Ah, a Fundamentalist. Thought so. Fundamentalists crave certainty - they crave it so much that they literally cannot accept any version of reality where things are not clear-cut, not black-and-white, not absolute. In extreme cases, they burn witches or fly airplanes into buildings because of their certainty that God wants evil destroyed and that they are His instrument.
Probably explains why such a high percentage of these false rape convictions take place in the Bible Belt - a combination of paternalism and Fundamentalism among the judiciary.
I may have missed the quote. For that I am sorry. The sentiment continues.
/johnny
For the safety of all those who would be harmed by the 100 guilty who go free, are YOU volunteering to be the one innocent man to be convicted?
1. Very biased juries. All businesses are afraid of going to the jury.
2. Cowards on defense. Most cases are settled out of court. Plaintiff's love that. Defendant's love that because they it is a safe gamble. Attorneys love that since it is money for less work. Judges really love that because it reduces their dockets.
3. Television - I remember in the mid 1980's seeing the first attorney commercials. Sam Bernstein. He's so well known in these parts than when someone says "Call Sam!", everyone knows who Sam is. Small Claims Court shows on TV showed people getting sued. People's Court, etc. Combine Sam and the court shows, and you get what you get today.
4. Judges. Not all judges, but most judges are bound by precidents set by above courts. Most tort law is common law, also known as judge made law, which dates back to 1700's England. Judges that set litigious common law reward plaintiffs.
5. Contingency fees. In many major tort cases, a plaintiff pays the attorney by a percentage of the earnings. The justification in this is that some plaintiffs who could not afford an attorney otherwise can now do so. The counterpoint is for obvious reasons.
6. Plaintiffs. Sam Bernstein doesn't get work unless there's a client. A good lawyer tells a prospective plaintiff the possible scenarios and foresee what would likely happen. The lawyer works for the client, not the other way around. If I do not act in the best interests of my client, I'm liable for a lawsuit myself - malpractice.
On a side note, ambulance chasing IS illegal. Lawyers or their agents can not solicit a client. Doing so is cause of being in trouble from the bar association of that state.
Now while I do not care for the over-litigiousness when it comes to neglegence torts cases (the big money), I do wish there are more penalties for breaches of contract. To me a contract is a promise, and people should keep their promises.
Yes, but the fact is, most of the convicted that are innocent and were unjustly convicted obviously know this from the start, and most have families. You'd think the families would pay for the tests. As in this case, the man had a court room full of family.
When questioned on the stand, she should have told the truth...that she wasn’t sure. Instead she lied and said it was definitely him. I’m a woman, and while I sympathize for what she went through, it was her words that wrongly convicted an innocent man.
Innocent as in being innocent of that particular crime.
Our justice system is corrupt. Family gets put into it's place by officers of the state.
Just the way is is, bro.
/johnny
I'm not sure what you were responding to, but your "let me get this straight" wasn't anywhere close to a reply to my post. I'm not totally discounting eyewitness testimony, but if it's the only evidence used to convict a man who spent 23 years locked up for a crime he didn't commit, then it obviously isn't enough to convict beyond a reasonable doubt. Fortunately, DNA evidence is being used prominently by all law enforcement agencies/defense counsels, preventing a lot more of these false imprisonments from moving forward.
In cases such as this, how often does the woman suffer any legal consequences at all for falsely accusing a man of raping her? From what I have heard, almost never.
Crystal Gail Magnum was not prosecuted for her false rape allegations. She won't get twenty years in jail, she won't get 20 seconds. It was apparently perfectly legal for her to try to destroy those boys' lives. Mike Nifong lost his law license, and received one day in jail. One day.
That shows how seriously this society takes false allegations of rape.
At best McGowan will receive some compensation from state taxpayers.
/johnny/
I don’t know.
John
Hey everybody, tear gas wants to be locked up for no reason to serve an example! And you "people need to understand one of the reasons for putting people in prison is to make an example of them - deterrence." He'll be so proud to serve as an example! Isn't tear gas such a great example! It would be a grand idea for tear gas to go take credit for a rape he didn't commit, so long as he "serves as an example!" Well as long as "the mistake is never exposed." So all you rapists out there who have innocent people serving life in prison on your behalf, tear gas gives you a great big "THANK YOU" salute!
Did he really have to put a sarcasm tag on his post?
He made it pretty darn clear in subsequent posts that he wasn’t being sarcastic.
16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;
17 then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;
18 and the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;
19 then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.
20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.
21 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.