Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

While McCain Watches [Peggy Noonan]
The Wall Street Journal ^ | April 18, 2008 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 04/17/2008 10:46:15 PM PDT by Aristotelian

On Tuesday at Washington's Convention Center, Hillary Clinton made the best speech of her campaign. She told the American Society of Newspaper Editors how she conceives "the power and promise of the presidency." She asserted that President Bush had been "unready" for the office, did not understand its "constitutional character," exhibited in his decisions an "ideological disdain." She said she hopes to "restore balance and purpose" to the presidency, and detailed specific actions she would take immediately on entering the White House.

It was an important speech, and someone, probably many someones, worked hard on it. It was highly partisan, even polar, but it was a more thoughtful critique of the administration, more densely woven and less bromidic, than she has offered in the past, and she used a higher vocabulary. So eager was she to be heard she actually noted at one point that what she'd just said was not "a soundbite."

And here's the thing. It didn't matter. Nobody noticed. A room full of journalists didn't notice this was something new and interesting. And they didn't notice because nobody is listening anymore.

Mrs. Clinton is transmitting, but people aren't receiving. She has been branded, tagged. She's been absorbed, understood and categorized. People have decided what they think, and it's not good.

It took George W. Bush five years to get to that point. It took her five intense months.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; hillary; mccain; noonan
It took George W. Bush five years to get to that point. It took her five intense months.

Peggy Noonan can be so rude sometimes.

1 posted on 04/17/2008 10:46:15 PM PDT by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

About what? Senator Hildabeast, or our illustrious President?


2 posted on 04/17/2008 10:47:23 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Who kidnapped Peggy and substituted this Harridan?
3 posted on 04/17/2008 10:50:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (McCain could never convince me to vote for him. Only Hillary or Obama can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Ah...if only Peggy Noonan ever meets a person she thinks as highly of as she thinks of herself.


4 posted on 04/17/2008 10:52:19 PM PDT by top 2 toe red ("Cackling hillary...makes her sound like she is mentally-illary." Jimmy Kimmel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Peggy is the most beautiful and charming assasin in the world!!! She will cut your innards out with a smile on her face while she is staring in your eyes!

For a moment I thought the article was going to be about praising Hillary’s newfound depth of thought! LOL!

We are lucky to have Peggy on our side!!!


5 posted on 04/17/2008 10:52:43 PM PDT by The_Republican (Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

a lot of people still believe that peggy noonan is miffed about not getting a position in the bush white house.


6 posted on 04/17/2008 10:56:08 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
She will need more than four years, but Hillary will try for a comeback.

She will wear skirts. Gone will be the pantsuits that made her look like a small blond man with breasts.

7 posted on 04/17/2008 11:05:53 PM PDT by Rudder (Klinton-Kool-Aid FReepers prefer spectacle over victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

I think her idea that John McCain announce in advance he intends to serve only one term if elected is terrible. It signals a lack of self-confidence in his own agenda and concedes that his age is a problem. Better he should pick a great V.P. who then takes on prominent responsibilities, have an ambitious and productive first two years and then after the 2010 mid-term elections make an announcement that he won’t run for re-election if that is the case.


8 posted on 04/17/2008 11:16:21 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Ms. Noonan seems to believe that Obama's time is four years hence. That's not likely to be so. Not even his sonorous voice can hide the liberalism and the truly voracious political ambition in his heart. That liberalism launched his political career in Chicago, but won't carry him through to the Presidency. And that voracious political ambition kept him seated in a pew for 20 years listening to Jeremiah Wright spew his ugly, divisive bile. A man who will for so long lend his soul to a charlatan in order to gain political advantage is not a man worthy of leading this country. Enough Americans will see this whether he wins the Democratic nomination this year or four years from now or even later.

Bye-bye, Obama, we hardly knew ye...nor are we the worse for it.

9 posted on 04/17/2008 11:16:52 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

McCain does not need to make any statements about a second term. From first hand observation, I can say that he does not give the appearance of a man of 72.


10 posted on 04/17/2008 11:28:52 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

The only skirt Hillary would be comfy in would be a kilt.


11 posted on 04/17/2008 11:30:15 PM PDT by OeOeO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

While she continues to show her talent, she’s becoming easier for me to disregard


12 posted on 04/17/2008 11:47:47 PM PDT by Gator113 (Hey Democrats, "I drink your milkshake.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

I’m not trying to be pissy here, but I think McCain’s 96 year old mother looks healthier than he does.

John is supposed to be from Arizona; a sun tan would help....he appears a bit pasty. This is the televison age....he needs to spruce up his appearance before the general election.


13 posted on 04/17/2008 11:53:58 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Change.....that's what we will have left in our pockets if a Democrat gets elected president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
John is supposed to be from Arizona; a sun tan would help....he appears a bit pasty. This is the televison age....he needs to spruce up his appearance before the general election.

He purposely stays out of the sun. He knows only too well the havoc skin cancer causes.

14 posted on 04/18/2008 12:02:40 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

“... a small blond man with breasts...”

Rapier thrust. Ouch!


15 posted on 04/18/2008 12:05:02 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

When you have had skin cancer on your face and treated successfully, you don’t go for the suntan.

I saw several of the POWs who returned after the Vietnam war. can’t really judge how McCain looks after several yrs as a POW vs some guy who hung out at the spa and gym.


16 posted on 04/18/2008 12:53:13 AM PDT by SoCalPol (Don't Blame Me - I Supported Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

That didn’t help Kerry.

Except for having melanoma, McCain has remarkably clear, firm and young-looking skin for someone 72.


17 posted on 04/18/2008 1:36:06 AM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
It took George W. Bush five years to get to that point. It took her five intense months.

And that was back in '92!

18 posted on 04/18/2008 2:02:08 AM PDT by uglybiker (I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
I think her idea that John McCain announce in advance he intends to serve only one term if elected is terrible. It signals a lack of self-confidence in his own agenda and concedes that his age is a problem. Better he should pick a great V.P. who then takes on prominent responsibilities, have an ambitious and productive first two years and then after the 2010 mid-term elections make an announcement that he won’t run for re-election if that is the case.
I agree. Your idea is better than Peggy's. And she got paid for her idea, you offer yours here for free. Where's the fairness?
19 posted on 04/18/2008 3:49:58 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
he appears a bit pasty

Once you've had skin cancer (and he had malignant melanoma which has a 25% mortality rate) you should not even leave your house without a sunscreen lotion which would prevent one from getting a tan.

20 posted on 04/18/2008 4:04:53 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Who cares about this shrill anyway? I’m waiting for her to come out and endorse Osama Hussein (after her fawning and shmeful 1-hr long praise of him on MTP a couple of weeks ago).


21 posted on 04/18/2008 4:17:10 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

Bravo, Peggy, Bravo!!!


22 posted on 04/18/2008 5:36:26 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation
John is supposed to be from Arizona; a sun tan would help....he appears a bit pasty.

Sun, skin cancer.......

23 posted on 04/18/2008 5:38:01 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: varon

.....Sun, skin cancer.......

.....Sun, vitimin D....

Benefits outweigh the risk


24 posted on 04/18/2008 5:43:33 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam
Better he should pick a great V.P. who then takes on prominent responsibilities, have an ambitious and productive first two years and then after the 2010 mid-term elections make an announcement that he won’t run for re-election if that is the case.

I don't see any 'obvious' VP picks out there. Bush has so neglected his role as party leader that he has allowed several of the better conservative office holders to get picked off. Santorum is gone. George Allen is gone. That's just off the top of my head. "Conventional Wisdom" says McCain should pick a conservative runningmate, but the one's with national stature are damaged goods.

25 posted on 04/18/2008 8:26:13 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Santorum got beat by idiotic republicans in Pa who wanted to “teach a lesson” because he dared to endorce Specter rather than Toomey.. had nothing to do with Bush, just foolish petty voters in PA.. who have have a guy as their Senator who is harder to find than waldo, and less qualified than Fauxbama.


26 posted on 04/18/2008 8:28:17 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

You didn’t go far enough in your analysis. Santorum was carrying Bush’s water for him when he supported Specter over Toomey.


27 posted on 04/18/2008 8:53:06 AM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

No, Santorum was putting party before himself. Toomey could not win the general, and holding onto the Senate was more important than pandering.


28 posted on 04/18/2008 10:10:44 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

I hate to say it, but Hillary’s appearance has been very mannish. We’ll see if she tries to be more feminine in appearance at some point.


29 posted on 04/18/2008 12:17:00 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian

>>She asserted that President Bush had been “unready” for the office, did not understand its “constitutional character,” exhibited in his decisions an “ideological disdain.”<<

“Ideological disdain?” Sounds like Obama. Hillary Clinton is keeping her disdain under wraps for now, but make no mistake, she has plenty.


30 posted on 04/18/2008 2:08:00 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

Democrats’ Damaging Brawl - Clinton and Obama are paving the way to a McCain win.
The Washington Post | April 20, 2008 | David S. Broder
Posted on 04/19/2008 10:23:27 PM PDT by Aristotelian
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2004238/posts

Wright Is Out To Destroy Obama...says Time’s Joe Klein
Townhall.com | 4/28/08 | Hugh Hewitt
Posted on 04/28/2008 9:39:18 AM PDT by LJayne
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2008118/posts

Hillary Clinton has just the right strategy — for 2012
St. Louis Post-Dispatch | 4-25-08 | Bill McClellan
Posted on 04/25/2008 11:46:37 AM PDT by kingattax
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2007003/posts

[snip] It became clear a couple of months ago that Barack Obama was going to get the nomination. Given the way the delegates are allotted on a proportional basis rather than on a winner-take-all basis, Obama’s lead became insurmountable during his winning streak. And there was never a realistic hope that the superdelegates would overrule the will of the voters. If they did, there would be chaos. The party would risk alienating its single most faithful bloc — African-Americans... You’ve got to hope that [Obama] loses the general election. If he wins in 2008, he’ll run for re-election in 2012. That means... Hillary would be... 69 by [2016]... Also, the odds will be against the Democrat in 2016. This is true no matter how Obama does in 2012. [end]


31 posted on 05/02/2008 11:40:22 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aristotelian
Peggy Noonan can be so rude sometimes.

To the contrary, I find brutal honesty quite refreshing.

32 posted on 05/02/2008 11:50:00 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

When I wrote that, I had my tongue planted firmly in my cheek.


33 posted on 05/02/2008 2:16:04 PM PDT by Aristotelian ("Sock it to me!" Judy Carne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson