[preacher]

ping

[Sherman Logan]

A group of scientists have challenged the IPCC to admit that there is no evidence that human activity drives climate change.

The reporter uses very sloppy language here. What he means to say is that the IPCC's position should not be considered proven by the evidence.

There is of course a great deal of evidence that can be interpreted to support the IPCC's position. The dispute is specifically with regard to how this this large body of evidence should be interpreted, not whether it exists.

There is a great deal of difference between saying there is no evidence, and saying that a position has not been proven.

[stockpirate]

With the UN’s recents comments concerning the starving masses and misuse of corn this may just be what kills this load of crap.

Boy if this were to happen I wouild love to see someone ask spineless Newt about his newest position on Global warming.

[Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)]

And all for 9 months a 1 day left, pinhead Bush continues to snore.

Being U.S. president must be the greatest non job in the world. And a huge retirement after that…like those U.S CEOs.

I took the wrong career path.

[rmh47]

But...but...but...I thought the science was settled.

[Fox_Mulder77]

I think Global Warming legislation is doing it’s job:
Global Warmers say it’s man that is destroying the earth. So getting rid of man will put an end to the problem, right? People can’t live without food, so burn it. Earth saved, everyone happy. :-(

[BallyBill]

I think they are asking people to admit that their jobs aren't needed.

I expect a crazy denial and name calling by the Global Warming Alarmists.

[RightWhale]

A committee on Climate Change could hardly deny climate change. They could disband without comment or with comment but they could not remain as a funding center.

[Sgt_Schultze]

bookmarking

[SuziQ]

Climate ping!

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[TiberiusClaudius]

Evidence presented in the letter goes well beyond putting the “hockey stick” graph, made famous in Al Gore's movie, in doubt. The hockey stick presented exponentially increasing global temperature in the near future due to uncontrolled increases in CO2 – and got its name from the shape of the graph – an apparently long stable period with an upward increase in CO2 and temperature during the industrial age.

For a better description of the Hockey Stick, see What is the ‘Hockey Stick’ Debate About?

McIntyre and McKitrick have more recent stuff added to the debate, but that's still a pretty good place to start reading about it. More recent stuff at Climate Audit

[Justa]

I'm still waiting for media-based science to debunk the greenhouse effect. The concept is a falsehood. Higher CO2 concentration provides no long term atmospheric insulating properties against convection, water vapor and air flow -the processes by which the atmosphere loses heat. It's a total scam.

[Delacon]

btt

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

The Green Zone

Americans for Prosperity: "If You Think Taxes Are High Now, Just Wait Until Congress Tries to ‘Fix’ Global Warming"

Global warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

[Straight Vermonter]

We don't really even know if the temperatures are actually going up or if so by how much. There is so much urban heat island effect distorting the numbers that it is hard to say with say with any accuracy.

Of course temperature measuring equipment like this doesn't help.

How about a hot parking lot as a place to measure temperature?

Lots more

[InterceptPoint]

I have a general question for anyone who has more background than I have on the man-made Global Warming issue.

I'm currently in a debate in another forum with a flaming lib who has challenged me to find any peer reviewed article in a reputable technical journal that disputes the supposedly settled science of Global Warming and in particular the dominance of the human impact on climate change. We are currently focused on the list of scientists that are discussed in Lawrence Soloman's book "The Deniers".

I do know that it has been stated that a recent survey did indeed show that there were ZERO articles published in peer reviewed technical journals that were skeptical of the man-made Global Warming thesis.

So I hoping someone can point me to some relevant sources or verify that there are none.

[CedarDave]

BUMP!!