Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voting for McCain, Kinda – A Proposal
Self | 26 April 08 | Grut

Posted on 04/26/2008 12:45:36 PM PDT by Grut

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-231 next last
To: counterpunch
It’s either that or throw in the towel and hand it all over to the liberal wing of the Democrat party.

Or the liberal wing of the Republican party....
181 posted on 04/26/2008 9:15:56 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Vote for the one, who is least dangerous. Then let’s all work to get a real candidate for the next round. Romney, or perhaps even Hunter.

Didn't we say that in 2000 and 2004? And now we have an even more liberal nominee. Whose next? Kennedy (R) ?
182 posted on 04/26/2008 9:17:40 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: E. Cartman
While I agree with quite a lot of what he says, I cannot get past his long history of betrayal. Given the likelihood that he'll be a one-termer, I expect him to play the "legacy" card right out of the gate and to rush to Teddy Kennedy's office to make common cause with the left. And, as conservatives and Republicans are left holding the bag, the democrats dance in the streets and editorial writers across the country lionize him for having grown in office and for ushering in a new era of bi-partisanship.

That is a very well-written summary of my concerns as well.
183 posted on 04/26/2008 9:19:18 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bill1952; Cringing Negativism Network; Cyber Liberty
No vote for McCain or anyone else is not a vote for Hillary or obama.

With that kind of illogic (saying that if I don't vote for McCain, then I'm voting for Hillary or Obama), then if I actually do vote for the Dem candidate, then I actually get two votes for them!
184 posted on 04/26/2008 9:22:30 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
I will not be frightened into voting for a crap like McCain.

Well, you know, it appears that the pro-McCain crowd is trying liberal tactics to try to scare us into voting for McCain. Emotional appeals, threats, guilt trips, blame - it's what the libs do. Not too surprising, since their beloved candidate is one.
185 posted on 04/26/2008 9:25:36 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
He just might be a whole lot better President, than you think.

He was a lousy Republican Senator. And he was a great Democrat Senator. So that sums up what kind of president I think he'd be.
186 posted on 04/26/2008 9:27:14 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; Norman Bates
>>McCain is going to shock the crap out of most FReepers. When he appoints strict constructionists, fights spending, issues many vetoes, fights entitlements, wins the GWOT. He’s actually going to do these things.<<

You may be right or wrong about that, but that won’t matter if he adds millions of Dem (or worse) voters via amnesty.


So true. McCain-Kennedy is the final straw for me. IF he didn't cosponsor that bill, I 'might' be considering voting for him. But since he collaborated on the biggest amnesty/takeover bill ever, I won't even consider it. Only a traitor to this country would've done that.
187 posted on 04/26/2008 9:31:06 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: neopolitan
McCain may stab us conservatives in the back every chance he gets, but he is very patriotic and will not sell our country down the river like the Dems will.

The irony - stabbing conservatism in the back IS selling the country down the river. You can't get around that, no matter how you spin it.
188 posted on 04/26/2008 9:32:40 PM PDT by CottonBall (A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority. "Civil Disobedience", Henry D.Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

Ummm, you do realize we’ve successfully kept Bush (and McCain) in line over the last 4 years, right?

We defeated Harriet Miers, we defeated Amnesty.
We did it by rising up as a community and demanding a change of course.
With President Bush and the Republican Majority, We the People gave them too much latitude. We are the ones who failed. We didn’t let them know when we disapproved, because at the time, we didn’t. We were too concerned with national unity in a time of war. And above all, the abject hatred the Democrats displayed for Bush caused all of us to rally around him.

But it will be different with President McCain will be that he is already on notice. We’ve already got his number. So we will not give him the same leeway we gave President Bush. The Congressional Republicans are on notice now too after blowing it bigtime, and we will not give them any leeway either. It will be a good excercise for us, taking the power back from Washington for the People.

What you need to understand though, is that we Conservatives and Republicans have NO POWER over liberal Democrats. None. We hold no sway. If the Democrats get the White House, then the liberal Democrats will hold all the power. The MoveOn.orgs and DailyLOSers, not us.

The Democrat street has become far more radicalized since they last held power. It will be a terrible time for America if they win this November.


189 posted on 04/26/2008 9:33:32 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
>>What you need to understand though, is that we Conservatives and Republicans have NO POWER over liberal Democrats.<<


190 posted on 04/26/2008 9:42:09 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

The only problem with that political cartoon is that We the People defeated Bush on Amnesty. This is what I’m talking about. Just like we defeated Harriet Miers and got Sam Alito on the SCOTUS instead.

As for General Pace, well there you go. There was no popular uprising from the People to demand his renomination.

When we speak up, Washington listens, when we don’t, they do their own thing.
We are just going to have to be a whole lot more vocal under President McCain, and finally begin to perform our own roles in our representative democracy. It is time WE stood up again and reclaimed the role our Founding Fathers envisioned for us, instead of being passive observers in our own democracy. It is time We the People reasserted our power. If we rise to the occasion, then we will have nothing to fear from President McCain. The same cannot be true in the case of a President Obama, or President Hillary.


191 posted on 04/26/2008 9:55:03 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
He just might be a whole lot better President, than you think.

Alternatively, he might be a lot worse than we think. You know, the key word is "might."

You have not convinced me that McCain will be that much better than Hillary or Obama. You only raised such a possibility, and given McCain's recent track record, that is a pretty slim possibility. You have, however, convinced me that the Republican establishment is so desperate to win over the same conservatives who they just stabbed in the back with the amnesty shenanigans of the past year.

McCain's activities during the Vietnam War are certainly laudable, but just because he acted honorably once does not imply that he will continue do so. But people do change and on occasion reveal their true character. After all, Reagan was a Democrat and an FDR lover before he saw the light.

As for McCain, he is a shrewd, power-hungry opportunist and no better than Hillary or Obama. The major difference, though, is that McCain will embrace you before stabbing you in the back, while Hillary and Obama will just stab you outright.

192 posted on 04/26/2008 10:01:10 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Republican...because not everyone can be on welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
just a thought, last summer (07) McCain went to the matt and fought hard for the amnesty bill, and somehow ended up as this years republican choice for Pres??? just thinking
193 posted on 04/26/2008 10:40:01 PM PDT by Beamreach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

I don’t think Bush ever cared what conservatives thought about amnesty. He would have signed the amnesty bill if he could, even after we shut down the switchboard.

We did defeat amnesty last year by keeping the heat on senators. I sent personal emails to every one of Kay Bailey Hutchison’s staffers. You are correct that we have to stand up, but since we didn’t stop him in the primaries, I think the only way to get McCain to listen to us is to defeat him in congress.


194 posted on 04/26/2008 10:40:39 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Yes, that is how representative democracy works.
We enact our will through our elected representatives, and we do that by letting them know loud and clear what we expect from them. This is not something we should do only once every 2, 4, or 6 years. We need to be active participants in the political process on all of the issues that matter to us.

I see a lot of hyperbole regarding McCain. I think we all know McCain is imperfect for what we would like to see in a president. But he is still going to be to the Right of Obama or Clinton on every issue, even the ones that he is to the left on.

And only the president is Commander-in-Chief of the military. No one else. This is the most important role our president fills. Other than choosing to veto or not to veto, it’s really the only power the president actually has.

People need to wise up around here about this.
If you think that McCain would be no better as Commander-in-Chief of our armed forced than Obama, then you’ve been sniffing some of his cocaine.

We are at a time in our history where we cannot play games with “protest votes” or throw temper tantrums and stay home. We need John McCain leading our troops in battle, not Barack Hussein Obama!

That is the bottom line.


195 posted on 04/26/2008 11:07:36 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Beamreach

Here’s another thought, smartass...
Last summer, McCain went to the mat and fought hard for the troop surge and victory in Iraq in the face of howls for retreat in the Senate. Which is why he ended up as this year’s Republican choice for president.

Do we forget so soon Harry Reid’s declaration that “the war is lost”?
Do we forget so soon Cindy Sheehan and Code Pink?
Do we forget so soon that we still have troops in Iraq fighting every day who want to be allowed to achieve victory?
Do we forget so soon that every last Democrat in congress has called for retreat and defeat, and only through the efforts of John McCain have we not turned tail and run?


196 posted on 04/26/2008 11:13:30 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kick McCain upstairs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Grut

What if Conservatives spent a little money and joined the Constitution Party (or Libertarian Party)? The Constitution Party would move from being the third largest party to the second or maybe even largest party, moving the Democrats and Republicans down the ranking. If this were accomplished before the convention, it might alert the RNC to the possibility that a lot of Conservatives are unhappy with McCain and maybe the GOP would select a different candidate in a smoke-filled back room.

Conservatives could still vote for McCain in November but it would alert the GOP to the number of people dissatisfied with McCain as a candidate. It would also build up a third party for next time so politicians wouldn’t smugly think about Conservatives, “where else are they going to go?”

This could backfire, though, because if McCain has the nomination taken away from him, he might try to run as an independent, further fracturing the vote.

In the future, the GOP needs to change the primary system. By the time most people get to vote, the Conservatives have already dropped out because states that vote earlier are often liberal. Also, crossover Democrats probably gave us McCain as our candidate, so close the primaries.

I also think we should work on the state level to take away government financing of primaries. The parties are private organizations which should pay the expenses of primaries themselves.


197 posted on 04/26/2008 11:14:31 PM PDT by colette (Where's a third party when you need one? Constitution Party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Cartman

Good summary of some of his negatives. What a loser!


198 posted on 04/27/2008 4:03:11 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
i don't deny that McCain went to bat for the troops. but since business community funds most political candidates, it would be a good idea for any canidate to support open borders. just as supporting the troops would be good for any conservitive canidate.
199 posted on 04/27/2008 4:51:16 AM PDT by Beamreach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
the business community funds candidate's from both parties, especially those who will help with the continued flow of cheap labor. My thought was that the gop pushing Mccain would be a pay back to the business community for the influx of money. Follow the cash. Most all candidate's are pro troops or at least say they are. As for me, my older brother is a former Marine, I am a former Marine and my nice is now serving in the Marines, I know who is pro troops..
200 posted on 04/27/2008 4:51:16 AM PDT by Beamreach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-231 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson