Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unemployment rate falls to 5% (CNN Ticker)
CNNMoney ^ | May 2, 2008 | Staff

Posted on 05/02/2008 5:35:46 AM PDT by abb

Employers trimmed a less-than-expected 20,000 jobs in April, marking the 4th straight month of losses; unemployment falls to 5%.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; jobs; markets; thebusheconomy; wgids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last
WE ARE DOOMED!!!
1 posted on 05/02/2008 5:35:46 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb

Death! Destructions! Armageddon!!

Oh wait...


2 posted on 05/02/2008 5:36:56 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Well, I guess it’s all over for the American economy.

HAH! Take that Mrs. Pelosi!


3 posted on 05/02/2008 5:37:17 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080502/economy.html

Employers cut fewer jobs in April, jobless rate falls
Friday May 2, 8:35 am ET
By Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer
Employers cut fewer jobs in April, jobless rate falls to 5 percent

WASHINGTON (AP) — Employers cut far fewer jobs in April than in recent months and the unemployment rate dropped to 5 percent. It was a better-than-expected showing that nonetheless still revealed strains in the nation’s crucial labor market.

A new report from the Labor Department on Friday shows that the economy lost jobs for the fourth month in a row. But in April the losses totaled 20,000, an improvement from the 81,000 reductions in payrolls logged in March. Job losses for both February and March turned out to be a bit deeper than previously reported.


4 posted on 05/02/2008 5:37:40 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/job-losses-moderate-april/story.aspx?guid={AE16E275-93A3-4D58-8CBE-79D7A8A8B15B}&dist=msr_1

Job losses moderate in April
Nonfarm payrolls down 20,000; unemployment rate unexpectedly falls
By Greg Robb, MarketWatch
Last update: 8:30 a.m. EDT May 2, 2008
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Job losses decelerated in April suggesting that the economic downturn may be short and shallow rather than long and severe.
Nonfarm payrolls fell by 20,000 in April, a much smaller decline than the average 80,000 jobs lost per month in the first quarter of the year.
The decline was much less than expected. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch expected job losses of 78,000. See Economic Calendar.
The jobless rate inched down to 5.0% from 5.1% in March. Economists had been expected the jobless rate to tick higher to 5.2%.

snip


5 posted on 05/02/2008 5:39:28 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

“It was a better-than-expected showing that nonetheless still revealed strains in the nation’s crucial labor market.”

Near full employment is “strains on the nation’s crucial labor market?”


6 posted on 05/02/2008 5:40:43 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

everything is fine. no problems. inflation is way under control. interest rates are excellent and banks have so much money to loan. people are paying their bills. fuel prices are ridiculously low. economy is growing by leaps and bounds. businesses both small and large are prospering like never before. unemployment rate is excellent.

yep all is good.


7 posted on 05/02/2008 5:41:34 AM PDT by commonguymd (Let the socialists duke it out. All three of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120973101930762571.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Economy Shed Jobs in April
But Pace of Decline Slows
By BRIAN BLACKSTONE
May 2, 2008 8:38 a.m.

WASHINGTON — U.S. employment fell a fourth-straight month in April, the government said Friday, but at a much slower pace than previous months, suggesting the economy may be starting to find its footing after several months of stagnation.

Manufacturing and construction firms continued to cut payrolls aggressively, but services employment rebounded, particularly in business and professional services.

The data, which included a surprising decline in the jobless rate, support expectations that Federal Reserve officials will keep official interest rates steady for an extended period as they gauge the effect of past rate cuts and recent credit initiatives on financial markets and the economy.

snip


8 posted on 05/02/2008 5:41:43 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2008/05/02/when-losing-20000-jobs-isnt-so-terrible/?mod=WSJBlog

May 2, 2008, 8:36 am
When Losing 20,000 Jobs Isn’t So Terrible
Posted by David Gaffen

Jobs
That makes four consecutive months of job declines. After the Labor Department reporteed another decline in jobs that fell short of the worst-case scenario, the equity market is rallying. Futures have bounced on news that the economy shed 20,000 in payrolls for April, and the unemployment rate surprisingly dipped to 5% from 5.1%.

Manufacturing and construction firms continued to cut payrolls aggressively, but service-related industries saw a rebound in payrolls.
# Stock futures bounced. The S&P 500 futures were up 13 points, compared with a 2.4-point gain prior to the release. Dow futures were ahead by 120 points, compared with a 45-point advance.
# Bonds slumped. The 10-year note was down 8/32, yielding 3.804%; it yielded 3.718% prior to the news. The two-year note’s yield was at 2.478% from 2.327% before the report.
# The dollar rallied. Against the yen, the dollar rose to 105.44 from 104.62. The euro fell to $1.5387 from $1.5475.

snip


9 posted on 05/02/2008 5:43:48 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: abb

I wonder what all these comments would look like if there was a Democrat in the White House.


10 posted on 05/02/2008 5:46:08 AM PDT by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soren

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-stock-futures-jump-jobs/story.aspx?guid={353DD083-288D-45DD-9B32-D853BE046BCE}&dist=msr_1

U.S. stock futures jump on jobs data, Fed injection
Microsoft leaning toward hostile Yahoo bid; Sun Microsystems disappoints
By Steve Goldstein & Simon Kennedy, MarketWatch
Last update: 8:41 a.m. EDT May 2, 2008
LONDON (MarketWatch) — U.S. stock market futures surged on Friday after data showing a far smaller loss of jobs during April than expected and a new Federal Reserve injection into the funding markets.
S&P 500 futures jumped 13.8 points to 1,425.40 and Nasdaq 100 futures rose 19.25 points to 2,002.50. Dow industrial futures climbed 119 points.
The gains also came as the Federal Reserve increased the amounts to be auctioned off in its term auction facility and further said it was expanding the collateral that can be pledged by dealers in the term securities lending facilities. The Fed now will accept AAA/Aaa-related asset-backed securities - say, credit-card or auto-loan backed securities - in addition to mortgage-backed securities.
The U.S. labor market was not as weak as expected in April, the government said Friday. The economy lost 20,000 nonfarm payroll jobs last month, according to a survey of business establishments, much less than the 81,000 lost in March and way below the 78,000 decline expected by economists surveyed by MarketWatch. The unemployment rate inched down to 5.0% in April from 5.1% in March. Economists were expecting the unemployment rate to tick up to 5.2%.

snip


11 posted on 05/02/2008 5:46:54 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: abb

Libs are deeply saddened.


12 posted on 05/02/2008 5:47:27 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (El Conservo Tribe, tribal name "Avoids Fort Marcy Park" Watching the Rat Fight. typical white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

I think what’s happening is, in industries that aren’t directly or indirectly affected by the housing slump, companies are trimming the dead wood and holding on, for now, the good employees.

Now it’s a wait and see to see if the economy will speed up...if it continues to slog or worse, recess, you’ll see companies begin to REALLY tighten their labor expenses.


13 posted on 05/02/2008 5:48:09 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

< leftist >
Yeah, but they’re all burger flipping jobs.
< /leftist >


14 posted on 05/02/2008 5:49:07 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

Nowhere in the media is there any understanding of the natural rate of unemployment. Unemployment in any economy cannot be zero as there are always people who are “frictionally unemployed” and between jobs. 4-5% is pretty much the natural rate of unemployment in the US economy so for all practical purposes we are at full employment.


15 posted on 05/02/2008 5:49:07 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soren
I wonder what all these comments would look like if there was a Democrat in the White House

LOL. That's a good question, however I hope we don't have occassion to find out any time soon.

16 posted on 05/02/2008 5:50:29 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: abb

Keep trying to hire but no one want to work.


17 posted on 05/02/2008 5:50:44 AM PDT by SouthTexas (If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

That means the folks hanging out on the corner drinkin’ 40’s don’t have any excuse.


18 posted on 05/02/2008 5:51:07 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

Bad news .... for democrats..


19 posted on 05/02/2008 5:52:07 AM PDT by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

“Keep trying to hire but no one want to work.”

It is a weird dichotomy to see job losses in manufacturing, yet everything I’ve read has leaned towards there being a shortage of skilled manufacturing labor.


20 posted on 05/02/2008 5:52:09 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

Where you stand depends on where you sit. The black unemployment rate is 8.6% [down from 9% in March] and the Hispanic rate is 6.9%. For them, it is far from full employment.


21 posted on 05/02/2008 5:52:13 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

.....for all practical purposes we are at full employment....

except when you factor in all the illegals, we are far beyond full employment.


22 posted on 05/02/2008 5:53:14 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MrB

They’ll always have an excuse.


23 posted on 05/02/2008 5:53:19 AM PDT by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“Where you stand depends on where you sit. The black unemployment rate is 8.6% [down from 9% in March] and the Hispanic rate is 6.9%. For them, it is far from full employment.”

Bummer, guess they need to get a marketable skill.


24 posted on 05/02/2008 5:53:23 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abb

Could it be that Americans are starting to fill jobs that Americans wont do?


25 posted on 05/02/2008 5:54:34 AM PDT by DogBarkTree (The correct word isn't "immigrant" when what they are doing is "invading".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The kitchen down on the row just ran out of the soup of the day (CREAM of FEAR).


26 posted on 05/02/2008 5:54:39 AM PDT by Petronski (When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth, voting for Hillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

To work most places you must pass a drug test. Druggies don’t count


27 posted on 05/02/2008 5:55:00 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . The Bitcons will elect a Democrat by default)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bert

Have you ever wondered why you don’t have to pass a drug test to collect a welfare check, but those who work to pay the taxes do?


28 posted on 05/02/2008 5:56:48 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bert
Druggies don’t count

Only to the taxpayer who must pay for the costs of their health care, food stamps, incarceration, etc.

29 posted on 05/02/2008 5:57:32 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: abb
Employers cut far fewer jobs in April than in recent months...

If the unemployment rate went from 5.1% to 5% then employers must have ADDED jobs.

30 posted on 05/02/2008 5:57:53 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Next you will cite that statistic as evidence of racism ...


31 posted on 05/02/2008 5:58:25 AM PDT by sofaman (Moses dragged us through the desert for 40 years to bring us to the one place in the ME with no oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

Well, yeah, “the man”.


32 posted on 05/02/2008 5:59:20 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abb

Low unemployment.

No recession.

Democrats are deeply saddened.

jw


33 posted on 05/02/2008 5:59:26 AM PDT by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

No, the unemployment rate calculation is subject to external massage as folks drop off the roles.


34 posted on 05/02/2008 6:00:37 AM PDT by jwalsh07 (El Nino is climate, La Nina is weather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68
Bummer, guess they need to get a marketable skill.

It is a bummer for all of us. Half of the children in the US between the ages 0 to 5 are minorities. Blacks and Hispanics have the highest out of wedlock births and school dropout rates. By 2050, non-Hispanic whites will be 47% of the population down from 89% in 1965. Hispanics will be 29% of the population up from the current 16%. Demography is destiny.

35 posted on 05/02/2008 6:02:31 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: abb

Pelosi and Reid will claim that most workers who have lost their jobs recently have taken new lower paying jobs at McDonalds or Walmart.


36 posted on 05/02/2008 6:04:04 AM PDT by moose2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sofaman
Next you will cite that statistic as evidence of racism ...

No, I am just reporting it as the USG does. BLS April statistics on employment. You can read whatever you want into it.

37 posted on 05/02/2008 6:05:20 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

Third on the Democrats/liberal media playbook- Health Care


38 posted on 05/02/2008 6:06:50 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus (( commander of the simian host))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

“No, the unemployment rate calculation is subject to external massage as folks drop off the roles.”

Actually the way the UE rate is calculated has nothing to do with collection of benefits.


39 posted on 05/02/2008 6:09:25 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“Demography is destiny. “

Well I’d say Obama, Oprah, and Condoleeza weren’t informed of that limitation, were they?


40 posted on 05/02/2008 6:10:41 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

“Pelosi and Reid will claim that most workers who have lost their jobs recently have taken new lower paying jobs at McDonalds or Walmart.”

And of course the average wage going up will disprove that, but no one will challenge their idiocy.


41 posted on 05/02/2008 6:11:58 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
If the unemployment rate went from 5.1% to 5% then employers must have ADDED jobs.

About 40 years ago my statistics professor told us when statistics are given without supporting data , most of which I have forgotten anyway , we were not only free to disregard them , we were advised to assume the presenter of such statistics intended to deceive .

42 posted on 05/02/2008 6:12:25 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: abb

WORST ECONOMY IN HISTORY!!!!!


43 posted on 05/02/2008 6:14:03 AM PDT by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

“Bummer, guess they need to get a marketable skill.”

Or aleast be able to speak the English language.


44 posted on 05/02/2008 6:18:46 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: abb
When the economy started turning around prior to the '92 election, the Dems spun it as a recovery in anticipation of a Democrat victory in November.
45 posted on 05/02/2008 6:19:10 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Global Warming Heretic -- http://agw-heretic.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative

And then they passed a retroactive tax increase and stopped it.


46 posted on 05/02/2008 6:22:10 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: moose2004
Pelosi and Reid will claim that most workers who have lost their jobs recently have taken new lower paying jobs at McDonalds or Walmart.

You are right. That is what they always say. However, if the economy was/is so bad...people wouldn't be hired at McDonald's or WalMart either. Those places would be feeling losses in sales and wouldn't need more employees. I always wondered why no Repub. ever said that to the Dems when they offered those type of comments.

47 posted on 05/02/2008 6:24:34 AM PDT by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: abb

What is occurring is what many experts (don’t ask me to name names) said would happen last year. We would have slow growth but no recession in the first half of the year. Then things would pick up. It looks like they were correct. But I guess we’re still DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED! (smirk)


48 posted on 05/02/2008 6:24:48 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

Not to mention the fact that avg hourly earnings continue to rise (albeit slowly over the last few months). If there was epidemic mass move from good paying position to McJobs paying positions, you’d see that reflected in the national payscale.


49 posted on 05/02/2008 6:26:19 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

Do I detect a note of sarcasm here???


50 posted on 05/02/2008 6:26:22 AM PDT by MCCRon58 (Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, criticize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson