Posted on 05/05/2008 10:05:50 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows
I don’t have to remind my readers that I spend a good bit of my time disagreeing with campus leftists. Nor do I need to remind them that most of these disagreements are with leftist professors. But, until now, I haven’t written about one of the subjects upon which we frequently disagree. That is the subject of whether deterrence theory “works.”
Conservatives and leftists (I have a hard time calling them liberals because of their fascistic tendencies) have a fundamentally different view of human nature. Leftists see humans as innately good. That is why they think rehabilitation works. It is also why they think the United Nations is a good idea. If people are innately good then, surely, they can talk out their problems without resorting to war.
But conservatives have a more tragic view of human nature. We believe that people with innately destructive tendencies must be held in check. That is why we so frequently speak of traditional values. That is why we also speak of the need to have a punitive criminal justice system, which serves as a back-up plan when traditional values fail. The ideal system would mete out punishment that is swift, certain, and severe.
In a nutshell, conservatives believe the Reagan military build-up produced the fall of the Berlin Wall. And we believe that criminals, like communists, are on their best behavior when they are afraid.
Ever since I began my transformation from leftist atheist to conservative Christian I’ve been arguing with professors inclined to dismiss deterrence theory. Those professors usually fall into one of two groups. First, there are those who name a specific “get tough” program that they believe “hasn’t worked.” Second, there are those who just blandly assert that deterrence theory, in general, “doesn’t work.”
Today, I plan to respond to both of these groups. Let me start with the second group.
Every time I hear a professor say that deterrence theory “doesn’t work” I log on to his university web page to peruse his syllabi. And in each instance I find evidence that he really does believe in the efficacy of deterrence theory. That evidence comes in many forms such the assertion that “plagiarism will be punished under the academic honor code” or “those who miss more than two classes will have three points deducted from his or her final average.”
Obviously, these professors seek to deter cheating and skipping class through the medium of punishment, not negotiation. That means the professors are hypocrites – not because they fail to live up to the things they say but because they do not even believe them in the first place.
It is better to ignore these hypocrites altogether. But those in the aforementioned first group should be taken more seriously. Since they tend to rely on specific empirical data rather than broad theoretical assertions, I now invite them to participate in a little experiment meant to assess whether specific measures based on deterrence theory actually “work.”
I want all of those leftist professors who say that having a gun in one’s home does not deter burglary to do the following:
1. Post a sign on your front door saying “Caution: You Are About to Enter a Gun Free Zone.”
2. Send a post card to DrAdams.org, P.O. Box 319, Wrightsville Beach, NC, 28480. Just note that you have posted your sign and leave a return address so I can mail you a crime victimization survey this time next year.
Next, I want all of those gun owners who say that having a gun in one’s home does, in fact, deter burglary to do the following:
1. Post a sign on your front door saying “Caution: You Are About to Enter an Armed Household.”
2. Send a post card to DrAdams.org, P.O. Box 319, Wrightsville Beach, NC, 28480. Just note that you have posted your sign and leave a return address so I can mail you a crime victimization survey this time next year.
There are also professors who continue to assert that actually carrying a weapon with a valid permit does not deter violent crime. For those, it will not be necessary to conduct a crime victimization study. There are already 15 refereed studies indicating that concealed carry permits reduce violent crime. While some published studies are inconclusive, none draw the conclusion that the permits increase violence.
Nonetheless, some leftist professors continue to use scare tactics by ignoring the evidence and claiming that concealed carry permits do increase violence. Such assertions are immoral because they are dishonest.
Such assertions are also careless because even those without guns are safer living in areas that allow citizens to carry concealed. This is because violent criminals do not know who has a gun and who does not. But, today, I plan to change all that by asking these leftists professors to write to DrAdams.org to re-assert their opposition to concealed carry laws.
After they send a post card to the address supplied above, I’ll send them a free t-shirt saying “Caution: I’m an Un-Armed Citizen.” If they get into trouble wearing it, they can always negotiate their way out of the situation.
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
LOL pretty good.
“Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound.” — L. Neil Smith
My late father was an Electrician's; mate in the Navy during WW2. He used to speak of learning ohm's law and how it applies to life. The path of least resistance produces the lest efficacy and more often is destructive. Learning to challenge the proper resistance to the ability you have to do so is the most efficient. More people need a course in elementary physics and electricity..
But...but...what about the 111,000 children who die in the US every year due to gun violence? Surely saving them is worth a dead hooker in an alley or two?
>> Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts “Womyn” On Campus.
Anyone read this book? I haven’t yet, but I think I may pick it up ... feminists make me laugh.
H
ping
Yes, that's the group that includes "children" up to age 25 that are gang members.
Yeah, and if you ever meet anyone that is not SOMEBODY’S “child”, be sure to get documentation.
That figure also includes at least 100,000 children who didn't die of gun violence.
Alas, the professor is preaching to the wrong paradigm.
In the larger society; we can never hope to reduce crime until we have achieved utopia. That is, until all poor people are rich and no-one ever has to endure a sucky childhood.
If you’re poor and angry, and had a bad time growing up, you cannot be held responsible for your actions.
That, at least, was the governing worldview from the sixties through the eighties.
The issue I have with this is leaving the advertisement that my hardware is inside. I don't need some creep trying to steal them when I'm not home. Keep the creeps guessing...Who's armed and who isn't?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.