Skip to comments.Happiness plummets with kids' arrival [Harvard expert alert]
Posted on 05/08/2008 2:13:15 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative
MARRIAGE is a constant source of joy, but introducing children into the relationship will send your happiness in a downward spiral, a conference has been told.
The more kids you had, the sadder you were likely to be, [Harvard psychology professor Daniel] Gilbert said.
US and European studies had shown that people's happiness did spike while they were expecting a baby but sharply plummeted after the child was born.
The low point came when children reached the ages of 12-16, and recovered only when they had flown the coop, he said.
"In reality ... children do seem to increase happiness as long as you're expecting them, but as soon as you have them, trouble sets in," he said.
"People are extremely happy before they have children and then their happiness goes down, and it takes another big hit when kids reach adolescence.
"When does it come back to it's original baseline? Oh, about the time the children grow up and go away."
[...skipping silly comparison of kids with Armani socks...]
"The psychologists tell us that we like things more when we pay for them - what does that sound like? It sounds like children. We pay for them in time, attention, blood, sweat and tears - what kind of idiots would we be to devote all of that to the rearing of our young if they'd didn't bring us some happiness?"
The fact that parenthood crowded out all other things in life could explain why we considered children our greatest source of joy, he said.
"Parents tell me all the time that: `My child is my greatest source of joy'," he said.
"My reply is that: `Yes, when you have one source of joy, it's bound to be your greatest'."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
Well Duh! Raising kids IS hard work, especially the 14-18 years, it gets better when they bug out? I suppose so, as far as the daily grind goes, but you never stop worrying about them. I told my older son, “kids are supposed to be a joy until 13, so you end only up with 5 or so years of stress, you’ve been a pain since 8, thats 10 years, no wonder I bald and grumpy.” I still love him but at 18 it was time to go!
While this guy does touch on some reasoned issues, his take on childbirth and the resultant unhappiness is just strange IMO. Yikes.
“The professor is a real piece of work, I say.”
Oh, he’s a piece of something alright. “Work” is not what I was thinking, though.
I’ve wondered if God made then diffucult from 14-18 for a reason. I disagree that they aren’t blessings and don’t bring happiness. Mine were so sweet when they were younger. If they were that way at 17 or 18 though, instead of counting the days before we can kick them out, would we not let them go?:’)
It depends what you mean by “happy,” doesn’t it?
If having a pair of Armani socks makes you happier than having a family with all its joys and sorrows, then maybe you are a bit, shall we say, shallow?
Speaking of psychoanalysts, Freud never really did understand what the world “love” means.
One of the best times in our lives as parents for my spouse and myself was having a houseful of tumbling, running, giggling toddlers all under four.
We absolutely adored our kids and still do. We wouldn’t have traded it for the world.
Is he a poofter?
Is he a zero population growth ecoweenie?
What do you want to bet that Professor Gilbert had a bias against children and in favor of abortion long before he started his “research?”
Thanks to liberals, of course raising children in modern America is a nightmare.
Liberal schools make them into spoiled, selfish little wildings—and then you get arrested if you try to slap some sense into the little brats.
I have three children - a 19 year-old, a 16 year-old and a 2-1/2 year-old. I am just as happy now as I was before they came along, if not more.
With all due respect, the Professor is an idiot.
Stopped reading right there!
Wow. I hope they didn’t spend a lot of money on the research, because I’ve done my own, and have found the root cause:
It used to be, children grew up to be adults here in the US at one time. With the boomers, they decided that adulthood was not for them and have opted to remain adolescents until they die.
You NEVER SOP WORRYING ABOUT THEM! The bigger they get the bigger the worry. Even once they’re on their own and married you still worry. The difference is you worry about their careers, spouses, children, mortgages etc. That’s the price you pay for being a parent and frankly, I wouldn’t trade a minute of it. The joys far outweigh anything else.
I have a few friends who are childless and seemingly happy but I feel sorry for them. Their lives revolve around friends and other family members and ours revolve around our close knit family.
The majority of the people I know well who have kids are less happy because of them. Spoiled brats and monsters, the lot of them (and the children are ever worse).
I plan to stay single, child-free, and happy.
If humanity is lucky, this professor is practicing what he preaches. Just like the pro-abortion crowd, they view their babies in the womb as special and they view yours as deserving a fork in it’s head.
Now back to the article. The professor is operating under the illusion that married with children means no other options but children.
When the article mentioned a mishmas of “studies” from the U.S. and Europe I just yawned. These studies often don’t even report what people say they report.
However, the prof. does have a point. People who have made grave errors in judgement or bigotly stick to evil notions will rationalize themsleves until they’re dizzy. Consider the foolish people who pay a lot of money for a “green” car often try to justify themselves in a feeble way by saying they are saving the planet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.