Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nutter, Rendell want assault-weapons ban - NRA says they exploit Liczbinski death (new federal AWB!)
Philadelphia Daily News ^ | May. 9, 2008 | CATHERINE LUCEY

Posted on 05/09/2008 10:34:55 AM PDT by neverdem

Days after a Philadelphia police sergeant was killed with a semi-automatic rifle, Mayor Nutter and Gov. Rendell called upon Congress to enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets.

"The time has come for politicians to decide," said Rendell at the City Hall news conference attended by top police brass and state elected officials. "You have to decide whether you're on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you're on the side of the gun lobby."

The federal assault-weapons ban, which lasted from 1994 through 2004, outlawed an array of military weapons and semi-automatics that fire and automatically reload when the trigger is pulled.

The expired bill would not have outlawed the Chinese-made SKS Carbine - outfitted with a 30-round detachable magazine - used to kill Sgt. Stephen Liczbinski Saturday.

But a new version of the legislation, currently languishing in the House of Representatives, specifically lists "SKS with detachable magazine" as a banned weapon.

Supporters of the federal ban said that the restrictions made it harder to obtain illegal weapons. But critics argued that loopholes in the ban made it easy to modify deadly guns to keep them legal.

Rendell and Nutter have sent a letter to the state's representatives and senators in Washington. In it, they ask for a new assault-weapons ban, but do not back a specific piece of legislation.

Nutter said that the city just needs help.

"Those weapons have one goal and use in mind," Nutter said. "They are to destroy human beings and do it as quickly and as dangerously and in as devastating a fashion as possible. I stand here with Governor Rendell and members of the general assembly to ask for help. Our state and federal legislators need to pass laws that protect citizens and do not protect criminals."

Two local legislators are already showing their support. U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah co-sponsored the new version of the assault-weapons ban. And U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak this week added his name to the list of co-sponsors.

Sestak said that after the Liczbinski slaying he decided to see if he could "bring a light to a piece of legislation that hasn't been moving around. Let's add our name to it and try to move this further down the road."

Nutter also criticized the National Rifle Association, saying they should support this effort.

"The National Rifle Association must explain to the public how they can stand behind criminals who have access to these kind of weapons while purporting to protect the Second Amendment right," he said.

NRA spokesman Andrew Arulanandam said it was "sad to see [Rendell and Nutter] stoop to this level to exploit the death of a police officer."

He said that new laws weren't needed. Instead he questioned why someone like accused killer Eric Floyd - who has a long criminal history and fled a halfway house earlier this year - was out on the street.

"The most important thing for residents in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania is to ask their governor and their mayor what career criminals are doing out on the street," he said. "The problem in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania is violent criminals get multiple chances."

Yesterday's news conference grew contentious when a Philadelphia Inquirer reporter questioned whether the SKS Carbine was technically an assault weapon, noting that the National Rifle Association disagreed with the classification and that a search on www.wikipedia.com brought up information saying it was not.

Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey then got into the mix.

"I don't care about Wikipedia or any other kind of pedias," he said. "If it's not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list."

Meanwhile, gun-control advocacy group CeaseFire PA sent a letter to Pennsylvania gun-shop owners Wednesday, asking them to voluntarily stop selling the SKS Carbine. Nutter and Rendell said that they supported the effort.

Fred Delia, 69, owner of Delia's Gun Shop, on Torresdale Avenue near Benner Street, sells the weapon. He said he would not honor such a request.

"I don't want to see any of the police get shot," Delia said. But, he added, "them guns have been sold for the last 20 years."

Delia, who has run his shop for 39 years, said gun-shop owners are being unfairly targeted.

"I understand they're getting mad in the city," he said. "They have to get to the source of this. It's drugs, it's judges." *


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: assaultweaponsban; awb; banglist; philadelphia; philly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last
Please, bring it on!
1 posted on 05/09/2008 10:34:55 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

we have a couple thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem


2 posted on 05/09/2008 10:38:36 AM PDT by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; DaveLoneRanger
Paging Henry Bowman!!

remember what happened to the politician???

3 posted on 05/09/2008 10:40:54 AM PDT by DCBryan1 (Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets.

Thing is, it wouldn't. ....and they know it.

4 posted on 05/09/2008 10:41:24 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

we have a couple thousand gun laws now; that are not enforced; one more is not going to solve the problem


5 posted on 05/09/2008 10:42:00 AM PDT by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I know a lot of folks in PA. who own guns and hunt. They all couldn't vote for Rendell fast enough. I told them when fast Eddie was running for his first term as Gov. that he was a gun grabber.

Union zombies.

6 posted on 05/09/2008 10:42:05 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (I miss Ronnie!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yup....Glad the drug laws keep the drugs off the street


7 posted on 05/09/2008 10:47:26 AM PDT by t1b8zs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
So stupid I don't know where to begin. I think this is the revealing point of the issue though:

"The expired bill would not have outlawed the Chinese-made SKS Carbine."

So by bringing the bill back they're not actually going to do anything about removing illegally owned weapons in the hands of criminals, they're just hoping that this time they can make some more weapons illegal to own... This is plainly evident by the fact that they want to change the bill now to specifically ban the SKS carbine. Do they really think we're so stupid as to believe the premise that outlawing guns will do anything to remove them from criminals who shouldn't have them in the first place? Do they think we're stupid enough to believe that this one specific model of assault rifle is responsible for a high percentage of police killings? It's completely obvious that it's just a stupid knee-jerk tactic designed to throw a thin veil of legitimacy to passing a bill designed to do nothing more than limit the liberty and freedom of law abiding citizens.

This bill as originally designed would have done NOTHING to prevent this killing, but even modifying it in this way would not change the ability of criminals to illegally obtain automatic rifles - at most it would just shuffle what kind of automatic they would wind up with. All a ban will do is make sure that criminals are the only ones with access to these weapons, and most likely the changes will not affect the ownership of pre-ban weapons anyway. Sadly, I suspect that if this last fact became well know, they would simply use it as an excuse to actually outlaw this class of weapon entirely rather than only affect the manufacture and sale of them.
8 posted on 05/09/2008 10:48:32 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey then got into the mix. "I don't care about Wikipedia or any other kind of pedias," he said. "If it's not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list."

DUMB





Meanwhile, gun-control advocacy group CeaseFire PA sent a letter to Pennsylvania gun-shop owners Wednesday, asking them to voluntarily stop selling the SKS Carbine. Nutter and Rendell said that they supported the effort.

Fred Delia, 69, owner of Delia's Gun Shop, on Torresdale Avenue near Benner Street, sells the weapon. He said he would not honor such a request.

"I don't want to see any of the police get shot," Delia said. But, he added, "them guns have been sold for the last 20 years."

Delia, who has run his shop for 39 years, said gun-shop owners are being unfairly targeted.

"I understand they're getting mad in the city," he said. "They have to get to the source of this. It's drugs, it's judges."

SMART


9 posted on 05/09/2008 10:48:43 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Days after a Philadelphia police sergeant was killed with a semi-automatic rifle, Mayor Nutter and Gov. Rendell called upon Congress to enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets.

BTW - the thugs who did this were muslim ex-cons who got out of prison early. They robbed the bank dressed up like muslim women to sneak in the guns...

10 posted on 05/09/2008 10:49:06 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative; airborne; smoothsailing; Dr. Scarpetta; martin_fierro; Coop; Tribune7; ...
BANG! This is such a predictable reaction, but I thought they were supposed to have learned their lesson to keep their gun grabbing schemes to state and local efforts and shut up otherwise.
11 posted on 05/09/2008 10:49:18 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"SKS with detachable magazine"

But the standard non-detachable magazine version is, of course, harmless.

12 posted on 05/09/2008 10:49:43 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"I don't care about Wikipedia or any other kind of pedias," he said. "If it's not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list."

...and there you have it!

13 posted on 05/09/2008 10:50:01 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

***”You have to decide whether you’re on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you’re on the side of the gun lobby.”***

It is only among wacked out liberals that these are two different sides. Where I live, the police think that career criminals should be in jail FOREVER so we don’t have to worry about whether they have a wicked looking rifle.


14 posted on 05/09/2008 10:50:13 AM PDT by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Their suppressed glee that this officer was shot was obvious in their anti-gun rhetoric on the local news last night. Nutter and Rendell are utterly disgusting.
15 posted on 05/09/2008 10:52:31 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
They robbed the bank dressed up like muslim women to sneak in the guns...

Can you find that & link it?

16 posted on 05/09/2008 10:55:27 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"You have to decide whether you're on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you're on the side of the gun lobby."

I have an idea lets ask the men and women who actually wear blue and not the various chief’s organization who are either appointed of elected politicians.

Very few street cops support these bans, all they want is to be allowed to carry the appropriate weapons by their departments.

17 posted on 05/09/2008 10:57:19 AM PDT by usurper (Spelling or grammatical errors in this post can be attributed to the LA City School System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This is just such a piece of $h!T !!

" .. enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets."
NOTHING will come off the streets ... threy'll come out of the hands of citizens with the right to own them.

" "You have to decide whether you're on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you're on the side of the gun lobby."
Bull$h!t !
He means ... the side of gendarmes or the citizens with the right to own guns.

"They are to destroy human beings and do it as quickly and as dangerously and in as devastating a fashion as possible. I stand here with Governor Rendell and members of the general assembly to ask for help. Our state and federal legislators need to pass laws that protect citizens and do not protect criminals."
Once again manipulating language and intent .... YOU, Eddy are part of the tyranical government the 2nd ammendment is in place against. .. Eddy is de facto begging for his life ... "Please don't shoot me ... and please help me from being shot"

"The National Rifle Association must explain to the public how they can stand behind criminals who have access to these kind of weapons while purporting to protect the Second Amendment right," he said."
More bull$h!t ... the NRA stands WITH Americans and we all accuse and prove it is you gummint people that stand behind and protect the criminals.

"The most important thing for residents in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania is to ask their governor and their mayor what career criminals are doing out on the street," he said. "The problem in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania is violent criminals get multiple chances."

You indict yourself, Eddy .... rather than we ask you ... why don't you answer it ... tell us ... why ARE criminals out on the streets? .. YOU'RE supposed to be the "strong arm".

Here we go again ....

18 posted on 05/09/2008 10:59:19 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Can you find that & link it?

Phila. police officer shot to death (thugs in "Muslim garb")

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2010855/posts

19 posted on 05/09/2008 10:59:46 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Where does Annie Oakley stand on this?


20 posted on 05/09/2008 11:00:26 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Paging our little buddy Chuckie Bloomer! :-)


21 posted on 05/09/2008 11:01:57 AM PDT by hiredhand (Check my "about" page. I'm the Prophet of Doom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: messierhunter
Sorry, back for more, found another sentence that made my blood boil.

"The National Rifle Association must explain to the public how they can stand behind criminals who have access to these kind of weapons while purporting to protect the Second Amendment right."

Horse dung. The NRA does NOT support the right to own guns of any kind for criminals. Gun grabbers like to accuse the NRA of such for their support of FOPA, which dared to clarify the list of persons prohibited from owning a gun. To anyone with half a brain and the willingness to be intellectually honest, the purpose of the NRA in supporting that bill, which covered far more than that, was not to allow criminals to own guns. FOPA also provided common sense gun rights, like the right to pass through a state with strict gun laws without being arrested for having a firearm locked and unloaded in your car. To gun grabbers like these idiots, that's probably tantamount to supporting the right of a "criminal" who is breaking that state's ban on gun ownership (say, of owning or possessing assault rifles).
22 posted on 05/09/2008 11:03:08 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Why don’t they investigate how this criminal got this weapon? Too much work huh?...TYPICAL!


23 posted on 05/09/2008 11:04:37 AM PDT by Edgerunner (At the heart of every absurdity, lies a liberal lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I think the police should set a good example and relinquish whatever assault weapons they might have. Maybe they can move on up to sidearms.


24 posted on 05/09/2008 11:06:35 AM PDT by rightwinggoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrd

“we have a couple thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem”

We know that laws are only obeyed by lawful individuals, and that the only real gun law makes the 20k+ laws on the books unconstitutional.

How many are there?

http://www.gunlaws.com/faq.htm#howmany


25 posted on 05/09/2008 11:06:45 AM PDT by petro45acp (NO good endeavor survives an excess of "adult supervision" (read bureaucracy)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"If it's not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list."


26 posted on 05/09/2008 11:09:55 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand
Mayor Nutter and Gov. Rendell called upon Congress to enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets.

How, with a giant magnet that will suck them up from the street?

Liberals would be funny, if they were not so dangerous.


27 posted on 05/09/2008 11:12:19 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Those weapons have one goal and use in mind," Nutter said. "They are to destroy human beings and do it as quickly and as dangerously and in as devastating a fashion as possible..."

Really Nutter? Am I destroying a human being in this picture?



No Nutter, I'm not destroying a human being here, but I am having fun destroying your claim.
28 posted on 05/09/2008 11:12:19 AM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"The time has come for politicians to decide," said Rendell at the City Hall news conference attended by top police brass and state elected officials. "You have to decide whether you're on their side - the men and women who wear blue - or whether you're on the side of the gun lobby."

I think the time has about come for the American people to decide if they are on the side of the Constitution or on the side of lowlife politicians.

29 posted on 05/09/2008 11:12:28 AM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

>Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey then got into the mix.
>If it’s not an assault weapon by definition, then add it to the freaking list.”

Carry that down to every type of gun, why don’t you?

What part of “the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” do you not understand?

And he is the Chief of Police?
Philly has bigger problems than it is able to understand.


30 posted on 05/09/2008 11:14:58 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

“That reload when the trigger is pulled”. Like a Revolver?


31 posted on 05/09/2008 11:19:37 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
"Those weapons have one goal and use in mind," Nutter said. "They are to destroy human beings and do it as quickly and as dangerously and in as devastating a fashion as possible."

Which is, I suppose, why so many police forces employ them, include Philadelphia's... ?

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

32 posted on 05/09/2008 11:24:52 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petro45acp

“we have a FEW thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem”

We know that laws are only obeyed by lawful individuals, and that the only real gun law makes the 20k+ laws on the books unconstitutional.

How many are there?
maybe I should have used Few instead of couple.


33 posted on 05/09/2008 11:30:28 AM PDT by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: petro45acp

“we have a FEW thousand gun laws now one more is not going to solve the problem”

We know that laws are only obeyed by lawful individuals, and that the only real gun law makes the 20k+ laws on the books unconstitutional.

How many are there?
maybe I should have used Few instead of couple.


34 posted on 05/09/2008 11:30:30 AM PDT by jrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And you can bet that all three frontrunners will allow such a bill to pass and be signed into law. That is what happens when you have a Pseudo-Republican who wants desperately to be a Democrat running against another who is officially a Democrat.

And all three have proven records of not caring at all for the US Constitution.


35 posted on 05/09/2008 11:30:48 AM PDT by TheBattman (LORD God, please give us a Christian Patriot with a backbone for President in 08, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It’s not the guns on the street, you lazy incompetent cowards...... it’s the criminals on the street.


36 posted on 05/09/2008 11:31:31 AM PDT by Gator113 (Obama is a member of the Far Wright Conspiracy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
>The time has come for politicians to decide," said Rendell at the City Hall ...

>>I think the time has about come for the American people to decide if they are on the side of the Constitution or on the side of lowlife politicians.

Exactly. - Stop FR. We have the FR quote of the day.

37 posted on 05/09/2008 11:33:22 AM PDT by bill1952 (I will vote for McCain if he resigns his Senate seat before this election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Which politician? I just finished reading it yesterday.
38 posted on 05/09/2008 11:34:45 AM PDT by wastedyears (The US Military is what goes Bump in the night.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Thanks for the URL!


39 posted on 05/09/2008 11:35:29 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

I know they made them remove the bayonet lug off them. This has stopped all drive by jabbings in Philadelphia!


40 posted on 05/09/2008 11:36:20 AM PDT by Holicheese (Hillary deserves the CMoH for her time in Tuzla!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

That cheesy Norinco SKS is the same sort of semi-automatic action as now legal hunting rifles. Look at the Remington 750, the Browning Longtrac or the Ruger ranch rifle, all semi-autos with detachable magazines. Start banning one style of gun from legal use and sales and you end up banning all guns.

Meanwhile, the crooks and bad guys will be armed and dangerous. If the mob can ship into the USA tons of heroin, cocaine and marijuana, they can add a few rifles and pistols to the loads.


41 posted on 05/09/2008 11:39:11 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Let’s get a consensus. It’s time to see who the Constitution deniers are.


42 posted on 05/09/2008 11:43:52 AM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Time to stock up on high cap magazines.


43 posted on 05/09/2008 11:44:12 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Rendell called upon Congress to enact a new federal assault-weapons ban that would remove such weapons from the streets.

Brilliant idea. All the criminals will immediately show up and turn in their assault weapons for sure. Gun bans in Chicago prove how well the laws work with the lawless.

44 posted on 05/09/2008 12:02:55 PM PDT by MovementConservative (John Roberts and Sam Alito.... Thank you GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
....the city just needs help.

This is one very EASY "fix."

First thing is to vote out every anti gun politician (but then, I repeat myself) currently holding elected office in the city of Philadelphia, and fire the police chief.

Next thing is to urge local residents to arm themselves and give them professional training using police ranges and equipment.

I would also make some kind of a deal so that city residents could buy Glocks or Sigs at severely discounted prices, in exchange for a separate contract to those companies on replacement weapons for all the cops.

I might think about outsourcing current police responsibilities to somebody like Blackwater USA, while relaxing certain Rules of Engagement in high crime areas. But that's only a thought....

45 posted on 05/09/2008 12:04:24 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

For all of you folks wondering what to do with that big government check. Now you know. Even with the smallest check, $600, you can buy a Polish Tantal (5.45mmx39 AK clone) and over 1000 rounds of ammo.


46 posted on 05/09/2008 12:09:31 PM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
And he is the Chief of Police? Philly has bigger problems than it is able to understand.

Chief Ramsey was the DC Police Chief during the "DC Sniper" & "Chandra Levy" cases. He didn't seem that effective down in DC. Somehow he got hired in Philly.

47 posted on 05/09/2008 12:13:29 PM PDT by Tallguy (Tagline is offline till something better comes along...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
And you can bet that all three frontrunners will allow such a bill to pass and be signed into law.

I definitely would bet McCain would never say that before November 4. The only reason McCain has less than an A rating from the NRA in recent years is because of his foolish McCain-Fiengold Campaign Finance law and support for a bill ending private sales at gun shows. Before that he had an A rating, IIRC.

McCain slated to address May 16 NRA convention - 2nd Amendment is session theme

The GOP lost the Congress in large part because the donkeys took the Second Amendment off the table. They ran RKBA donkeys for Congress. I think they just shot themselves in the foot, big time!

48 posted on 05/09/2008 12:23:51 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Nutter and Rendell. THE two most useless Democrats in the State of Pennsylvania.


49 posted on 05/09/2008 12:42:18 PM PDT by Old Mountain man (Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"The most important thing for residents in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania is to ask their governor and their mayor what career criminals are doing out on the street," he said. "The problem in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania is violent criminals get multiple chances."

BTTT

50 posted on 05/09/2008 12:50:16 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson