To: Free ThinkerNY
2 posted on
05/16/2008 4:53:09 PM PDT by
The_Republican
(Ovaries of the World Unite! Rush, Laura, Ann, Greta - Time for the Ovulation!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Are these pro-choice people holding up pro-life signs?
3 posted on
05/16/2008 4:54:03 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Freedom is the right of all sentient beings. - Optimus Prime)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Susan gets it. I was wondering why NARAL had to endorse anybody. They certainly weren’t going McCain.
4 posted on
05/16/2008 4:54:36 PM PDT by
jimfree
(Freep and Ye shall find.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Really now. Far as anybody over here cares it's perfectly OK for the Obamasama NARAL crowd to kill off the Hildabeast's NARAL crowd, and vice versa.
Ain't no thang.
6 posted on
05/16/2008 4:56:44 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Free ThinkerNY
So NARAL simply waited until they could see the winner emerge and then issued an “endorsement” so that for years to come they can try to extract benefits from Obambi..... not that he wouldn’t eagerly try to help them anyway.
What kind of endorsement is held back until the very final throes of the primary season when it won’t make any difference?
Oh, that’s right, the kind Johnny-boy Edwards just made of the already victorious candidate...... anything think Edwards is holding out for the Attorney General’s job in an Obama admin.?? Actually, I think Edwards ought to be made Ambassador to Zimbabwe...... or maybe Sudan.
8 posted on
05/16/2008 5:05:07 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Pro-death NARAL chooses Obama.
No surprise.
9 posted on
05/16/2008 5:05:36 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(McCain Wants My Conservative Vote --- EARN IT or NO DEAL !!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
10 posted on
05/16/2008 5:11:11 PM PDT by
B Knotts
(Calvin Coolidge Republican)
To: Free ThinkerNY
If you're brave enough for the (graphic) truth:
click here
11 posted on
05/16/2008 5:20:21 PM PDT by
Cedar
To: Free ThinkerNY
In some ways, it is disgustingly funny that the Dems are fighting over NARAL’s endorsement of Obama. I guess that HitLIARy does hate babies as much as Obama.
12 posted on
05/16/2008 5:23:20 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Soon Obama will get an indorsement from NAMBLA scarcasm off
13 posted on
05/16/2008 5:26:24 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Purge the RNC and GOP of ALL SOCIALISTS . Starting with Juan McCain.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama suppports NARALs mass murder of black babies.
And the idiot black voters will vote 95% for this phony.
15 posted on
05/16/2008 5:28:40 PM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: Free ThinkerNY; All
This post (<-click) exposes the USSC's folly in deciding Roe v. Wade. Note that the post first references two non-abortion cases in order to show Roe v. Wade in a different, troubling perspective.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Disgusting F* should not be allowed to to even mention the military.
*edited to avoid a timeout
18 posted on
05/16/2008 5:30:24 PM PDT by
darkangel82
(If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. (Say no to RINOs))
To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama supports the core values of the democrat party: the vast slaughter of defenseless babies and the sick elderly. Especially black babies and frail old black folks, the principal "beneficiaries" (40%+) of these murders.
20 posted on
05/16/2008 5:33:20 PM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Dear Susan Ostrich,
Permit me to explain this to you. It’s really simple. Have you ever heard of something called “shameless opportunism”??? That’s all it is. NARAL leadership waited until it was clear who the ‘Rat nominee will be and then jumped on board the bandwagon. It costs them nothing. As you note, even Shrillary will still want to “stand tall” for them in the future. All they want to do is to try to ensure some extra access to a potential Obama WH, and there was really nothing for them to lose.
That makes it a “no-brainer”
22 posted on
05/16/2008 10:08:20 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama! He’s the baby-killingest!!!
23 posted on
05/16/2008 10:47:59 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Actually, I can see NARAL'S thinking to support BO over Hillary. Granted, it's a sick kind of thinking, but I think I do understand why they are supporting BO. It's a business decision. Plus, it takes the heat off white Democrat pro-abortion politicians and lobbyists.
It's craven, but then.. there it is.
24 posted on
05/17/2008 4:59:56 AM PDT by
Alia
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson