[Travis McGee]

This is something more recent by Fjordman.

Creating a European Indigenous People’s Movement

From the desk of Fjordman on Sun, 2008-04-06 14:13

An American friend of mine has proposed that native Europeans should create a European Indigenous People's Movement. I have hesitated with supporting this because it sounded a bit too extreme. However, in more and more European cities, the native population is being pushed out of their own neighborhoods by immigrant gangs. The natives receive little or no aid from their authorities, sometimes blatant hostility, when faced with immigrant violence. In an age where the global population increases with billions of people in a few decades, it is entirely plausible, indeed likely, that the West could soon become demographically overwhelmed. Not few of our intellectuals seem to derive pleasure from this thought.

The rest here:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3153

Index of Fjordman articles:

http://chromatism.net/fjordman/fjordmanfiles.htm

[Myrddin]

Not few of our intellectuals seem to derive pleasure from this thought.

I would like to turn those fools over to the rabble they hold in such high esteem. Unarmed and without financial means to escape.

[nathanbedford]

Why do Swedish socialists indulge their ideology to the point of undermining their own country? Why do Swedish socialists persist in their experiments in multiculturalism when the results seemed to threaten the very existence of their treasured socialist system?

Do they want to make their white Christian society a minority white, minority Christian society? Is it racial, in other words, do they believe that a white culture is inherently immoral? Do they believe that a Christian society is inherently immoral? In other words, are they bigots? Do they believe that a mixed culture is somehow superior?

Or, is it that their ideology is only reactive, that the idea of expressing acceptance ( as opposed to preference ) of white Christian society is somehow bigoted and must therefore be avoided at all costs? In other words, was an immigration policy that aimed only to maintain the status quo somehow bigoted because it was not affirmatively multicultural? Is one a bigot for merely accepting the condition of his birth?

Could it be that leftists, for the most part denying the existence of God and therefore theologically free as well as constitutionally compelled to play God, cannot resist experimenting with whole societies? Was the temptation for leftist God -players in Sweden to turn the whole country into a giant skinner box, where whites can be properly conditioned to accept nonwhites and nonwhites could be properly conditioned to accept the virtues of socialism, just too irresistible? Is immigration policy merely a lever to be pulled in this giant skinner box? If one declines to use immigration to condition society, is that somehow bigoted?

What are we to make of the evident failure of the left to recognize, much less acknowledge, the failures of their own experiments? We read that one professor says that the solution to failed socialism is more socialism, that is, more government provided jobs. Other leftists in Sweden evidently simply blame the victims, citing young girls for behaving like young Swedish girls. Others retreat deeper into their ideology and lash out at other countries who do not share their broad-mindedness, in this case citing Denmark for its bigotry.

Is there a need on the left to be able to say at all costs to the world , even at the price of rational respect for empirical evidence, that the difference between you unreconstructed rightists and us leftists is that you are bigots and we are not?

Does anyone see any parallels between this behavior in Sweden and the behavior in America of the leftists who support Barak Obama?