Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US court: Paper money discriminates against blind
Yahoo ^

Posted on 05/20/2008 7:56:57 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

US court: Paper money discriminates against blind

23 minutes ago

A federal appeals court says paper money discriminates against blind people.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has upheld a ruling that could force the U.S. to redesign its money so blind people can distinguish between values.

Such changes could include making bills different sizes, including raised markings or printing oversized numbers for people who see poorly.

The appeals court ruled 2-1 on Tuesday that the U.S. didn't explain why such changes would be an unreasonable burden, especially since many other countries have done so.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 05/20/2008 7:56:58 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Two words:

Re Tarded.


2 posted on 05/20/2008 7:58:28 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I know a blind woman who can tell the difference in bills simply by touch. Don’t ask me how, but she has no problems at all.


3 posted on 05/20/2008 7:59:27 AM PDT by mnehring (We must, indeed, all hang together, or most assuredly we shall all hang separately.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If you pass a law requiring “reasonable accomadation”, you better practice reasonable accomodation. And if you think something would be unreasonable, you better be able to make that case to a judge.

In this case, the government appears to have failed to show how it would be too hard or too unreasonable to make our money easier for blind people.

If they don’t like it, congress can change the law.


4 posted on 05/20/2008 7:59:33 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT (Green, but not gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What ignorant sluts.


5 posted on 05/20/2008 7:59:42 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So, I guess the bigger denominations discriminate against poor people?


6 posted on 05/20/2008 8:00:14 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The appeals court ruled 2-1 on Tuesday that the U.S. didn't explain why such changes would be an unreasonable burden, especially since many other countries have done so.

A major problem with the USA today: we try to measure our success by what "other countries" do...so many, including Supreme Court justices, want us to COPY other nations--a losing proposition for liberty.

7 posted on 05/20/2008 8:00:58 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So up until this point no blind person in the USA could buy anything with paper money? I highly doubt that.

Besides... there’s always plastic.


8 posted on 05/20/2008 8:01:01 AM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

We could encode the money so it can be read by a scanner. Then we could take the printing off the bills altogether.

Of course, then couldn’t read the bill to see what it’s value was. But you wouldn’t care right — that woudl be Re Tarded.

/sarc


9 posted on 05/20/2008 8:01:36 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT (Green, but not gullible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Such changes could include making bills different sizes, including raised markings or printing oversized numbers for people who see poorly.

Well, they are already putting bigger numbers on the back. Just look at how big the 5 is on recent $5 bills. Maybe as a reasonable accommodation the government could also distribute metal disks as money which can be told apart by their size and edge ridges.

I'm just waiting for an ADA lawsuit against newspapers for discriminating against the blind.

10 posted on 05/20/2008 8:02:11 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

...or the illiterate.


11 posted on 05/20/2008 8:03:52 AM PDT by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I guess it will all have to be re-printed in braille?


12 posted on 05/20/2008 8:04:17 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Rush on McCain: "We're so screwed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Newspapers, magazines, billboards, pedestrian signals, voting booths etc. discriminate against the blind. I guess its time to redesign the whole country to give everybody that warm-fuzzy feeling.


13 posted on 05/20/2008 8:04:51 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
the U.S. didn't explain why such changes would be an unreasonable burden, especially since many other countries have done so.

So, if many other countries have already explained why this would be an unreasonable burden, then it shouldn't be difficult for the U.S. to do so as well.

14 posted on 05/20/2008 8:05:28 AM PDT by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Blindness descriminates against the blind.

Should we all blind ourselves to level the proverbial playing field?

15 posted on 05/20/2008 8:05:28 AM PDT by bannie (clintons CHEAT! It's their only weapon.; & Barry/Barack has two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Is there someway we can have a class action lawsuit, take the Government to court, prove it’s an unreasonable burden to people, and make it dissolve itself?


16 posted on 05/20/2008 8:06:09 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

You are right: it is Congress’ fault for imposing a slew of Federal “equal opportunity” laws whose scope is potentially unlimited and certainly unfunded. The meaning of “discrimination” has been warped beyond all meaning for a long time now, and ironically so, as far too many people are now unable to discriminate between intelligence and stupidity.


17 posted on 05/20/2008 8:06:25 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Peace Is Not The Question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And it was only the sighted people who complained about the dollar coins.. Go figure.


18 posted on 05/20/2008 8:06:45 AM PDT by vietvet67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

US Law has always taken into account what is going on abroad in other civilised countries. The so called ‘M’Naghten Rules’ by which a defendent can not be held accountable for murder due to insantity was adopted by the US states in the 1840s and is still the standard used in most US states to this day. Look it up. It’s interesting.

Besides, I don’t see what the problem is making different denominations different sizes so the blind can tell them apart more easily. It isn’t going to make any difference to your life, but it would make a blind person’s life a hell of a lot easier and less dependent on other people’s honesty...


19 posted on 05/20/2008 8:08:47 AM PDT by thundrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
How about age discrimination?? For starters...I am tired of being subjected to loud talentless noise misnomered “music” in restaurants.
20 posted on 05/20/2008 8:10:42 AM PDT by Notasoccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson