Posted on 05/21/2008 5:22:55 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[snip] Anyone who knows me is aware that I am a proud American and a proud Jew who, while not religiously observant, fiercely loves and defends his faith. It has become fashionable for Americans in general, Jew and gentile, to hold President George W. Bush up to derision. As I believe many readers and listeners of my commentaries know, I crossed party lines in 2004 to support the President's reelection, saying at the time that I did not agree with him on a single domestic issue, but I did believe he was the only one running who appreciated the threat of Islamic terrorism to American values and Western civilization and was prepared to wage a war to defend those values.
I have no regrets for having made that decision and helping the President to win a second term. Today, according to the most recent CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey, "71 percent of the American public disapprove of how Bush is handling his job as President, an all-time high in polling." His position can be compared with that of Harry Truman who left Washington unpopular and alone in 1953. Today, with the passage of time, most historians and certainly the American people, see Truman in a different light, primarily for his willingness to stand firm against Soviet aggression, whether against Greece or South Korea, and proclaim the Truman Doctrine, effectively defending the free world from Soviet efforts to expand their hegemony. Like Truman, George W. Bush, in my view, will be seen as one of the few world leaders who recognized the danger of Islamic terrorism and was willing with Tony Blair to stand up to it and not capitulate. [snip]
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Thanks for posting this.
It is the hard truth that far to many Bush critics are unwilling to face.
Maybe on the war, but not on limited government.
History will only redeem Bush if my daughter and her Nat’l Guard buds (and John McCain) have enough ass to cash the check Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld’s mouth wrote. Right along with those three, I was blind to the long-term near-impossibility of force-feeding modern elections and representative government to fundamental Muslim tribals in Sandland.
History will redeem Bush if, and only if, we’re able to do another South Korea. Under McCain, we’ll, hopefully, set up some kind of client state, leave enough troops to keep the opposition nervous, declare victory, and move on. If Obama takes over, we cut and run amd wring our hands as the Iraqis convulse and collapse and kill, just like we did when the North Vietnamese slaughtered their way south in ‘75.
Agree. This administration appeased congressional democrats through foolish “compassionate conservative” spending programs.
Generally agree. However, it’s said that radical arab muslims will never find peace until they love their children more than they hate Jews. That will take longer than a 4-year presidential term. God’s speed to your daughter.
I crossed party lines in 2004 to support the President's reelection, saying at the time that I did not agree with him on a single domestic issue, but I did believe he was the only one running who appreciated the threat of Islamic terrorism to American values and Western civilization and was prepared to wage a war to defend those values.
He says he supported Bush because he was the only one that understood the threat of Islamic terrorism to American values and Western civilization and was prepared to wage a war to defend those values.
Yet he now supports Hillary when she is almost exactly like all of the other on the loony left that thinks we can just waltz out of Iraq with no consequences.
His politics aren’t real clear to me.
it will on the war on terror
but his immigration stance and poor GOP leadership will be judged for what it was
it’s wholly unfair to compare Bush to Carter.
hell, Bush is better than Ford and Bush I.
it’s just the fact he strayed from conservatism when he really did not have to that got him and damaged the GOP
I’ve said this too. History will look kindly on Bush. For the reasons listed here and some others. I suspect that someday when certain stories can be told he will be considered among the great Presidents. Those who hate him now will pretend that they were in favor the whole time.
I’m thinking about getting some bumpers stickers made that say “Yeah, I miss Bush too”. I think they’ll sell well. :-)
I agree. Plus GWB is a good person. I don't know how he can be so affable and patient in the face of so much hatred spewed at him. I could never do it. I would be so bitter. I just think he is a fine man. God bless him.
I’m not arguing with this.
My beef with the Bush administration is amnesty and runaway spending. They may have over-reached in Iraq but it was for sound and strategic reasons. However, the acid test for this presidency is preventing another terrorist attack on this country. In that regard their performance has been stellar.
Jimmy Carter couldn’t shine GW Bush’s boots. And I voted for both of them!
I do not believe that President George W. Bush is only one of a few leaders on the planet today who understands the larger picture.
I believe there are a great many of them but for reasons of their own, choose a different path and also attempt to cloud the truth and deceive those they are supposed to be leading.
I believe that is the scary truth.
Yeah, President Bush might say he limited government but he is nothing compared to President . . . well. . . there is . . .
um. . .
Wait a second . . .
yeah he did not do very well limiting government.
As long as "history" is written by those who are currently writing it, it will never look on any Republican "kindly."
To this day, Alger Hiss gets better press than Nixon, McCarthy, and in some circles, Reagan.
You have snapped the last thread tethering you to reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.