To: ElkGroveDan
Very interesting. It seems that those of us who were worried about all that silly 'due process' stuff were right all along.
L
6 posted on
05/22/2008 10:50:30 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
To: Lurker
"due process" Oh, that musty old thing? It should be put out on the curb to be hauled away with the rest of the trash.
After all, it's for the children ya know...
The willingness of people to give up their freedom is scary. The inability of people to see that their freedom is being taken away and to applaud it is scarier.
28 posted on
05/22/2008 10:59:59 AM PDT by
Proud_texan
(Election 2008: What Clayton Williams said)
To: Lurker
Yep. Amazing how we get railed here for (HEAVENS!) daring to suggest that procedures should be followed.
32 posted on
05/22/2008 11:01:04 AM PDT by
arderkrag
(Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
To: Lurker
Well this will surely pay for a new and bigger church on that site !..........:o)
86 posted on
05/22/2008 11:22:03 AM PDT by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: Lurker
It seems that those of us who were worried about all that silly 'due process' stuff were right all along Don't be silly. Due process if for people we like.
(/sarc)
103 posted on
05/22/2008 11:28:41 AM PDT by
gdani
To: Lurker
It seems that those of us who were worried about all that silly 'due process' stuff were right all along.Oh no, we're all just child molestors at heart.
185 posted on
05/22/2008 12:07:20 PM PDT by
nina0113
(If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
To: Lurker
Very interesting. It seems that those of us who were worried about all that silly 'due process' stuff were right all along. Good. Now let's see if any of those so adamant (and derogatory) in their statements will bother stopping by for a serving of crow.
-----
There is a HUGE difference between holding the government within its Constitutional limits and agreeing what the FLDS are doing.
Let the government set the bar concerning 'due process', and it will doom us all.
297 posted on
05/22/2008 1:39:12 PM PDT by
MamaTexan
(* I am not a political, administrative or legal 'entity', nor am I a *person* as created by law *)
To: Lurker
Yes...and justafiably so. I find it interesting that the court would rule that, in essence, there was no legal right or reason to take the children, but did not order them returned.
It is clear that the entire basis for the warrant and raid were, as many saw early on, a sham and hoax, so why then not return the vast majority of the children to their mothers?
This has not finished paying out by a long shot...but I believe the state of Texas is going to pay heavily financially for this...and I believe that there are those who should also pay criminally for it.
The real shame is that, IMHO, they have made it much more difficult in the future, should true evidence and defendants come forward, for the State to address those issues with this group or others should they arrise.
1,058 posted on
05/23/2008 10:18:50 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Lurker
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson