Leave Hillary Alone!
Posted on 05/25/2008 12:04:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
The schedule for the primaries was different when Kennedy ran. The Ca primary was in June. Her comments were about the possibility of Obama being assasinated. If it was only about the selection, she could have left out the part about the assasination.
- my plan sends a major message to the leaders of the Republican party ( put up a conservative)
- takes away all chance of the Clintons regaining power ( she'll be too old to run in eight years)
- limits the dem damage to 4 years ( I doubt he'll be reelected ) and there's little downside (how much "change" can an inexperienced young person create?).
The reason dems talk about Obama's lack of experience is because they fear he won't be able to accomplish much - maybe they're right!
Trust me, this might be a little tongue in cheek, but it's not "careless".
If she can’t handle some public criticism, she shouldn’t have even tried in the first place.
What a slimy b*tch
really? talk to our current President... talk to Dam Quayle... i am glad the Clinton's are getting a taste of their own medicine...
AND....Obama will give the Dems a STRANGLEHOLD on the Supreme Court for 50 years.....THAT is what this is about!
really... all because of how the media covered her RFK assassination comment... you've never seen any other candidate treated this way just because they were a candidate?
whinny babies both of them. They need to fade away. They make more and more people sicker every day just by looking at them. They are like the LAST guests at a party who don’t have the common sense to leave nor the intelligence to realize that “ the party really IS over” and it’s time for them to leave.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAmen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But that's NOT the way the world works. The reward of one mistake is that a person is more likely to run happily to the next.
“What’s the matter with you? Is this how you turned out? A Hollywood finocchio that cries like a woman.”
Wow, you mean the President can do this all by himself? No, maybe you meant he could do it with the support of the Democrats in congress? No, he couldn't do that either. Maybe you mean he could do all that with the support of the Democrats in congress and also the support of the liberal Republicans in Congress? Yes, as with most bad legislation, the liberal Republicans would be the ones who put the bad policies "over the top".
“Vote Obama - end the Clinton rule”
uh . . . . . no.
It was a major major gaffe - almost up there with Gerald Ford's gaffe. Enough to finish her off (as if she needed much else as she was toast anyway).
If Obamer gets in there might not be NO election in four years.
With all the Democrats mouthing the talking point about McCain being Bush’s “third term,” I’ve yet to hear anything about Hillary being Bubba’s third term. Can we imagine Bill having renewed access to the Oval Office!
Trust me on this. Do not underestimate Obama and think that he will punt the ball in the stand and the Republicans will come out smelling like a rose if we lose the Gen. Election. The fact that he is going to be the Democratic nominee with his short resume is troubling within itself and I can only imagine the freak show of a cabinet this guy will put together. He raises money at an almost stupid rate and I guarantee he will hold onto power; if not through his own actions, through the actions of the folks that will be propping him up.
Don't bite that apple. Trust me.
Ummm, if Obama loses to McCain, Hillary will be back in four years with an "I told you so". And a powerful "I told you so" at that. Nope, the best thing is for Obama to win - then we're done for good with the Clintons, we're done with the MSM picking our candidates, and were done with spineless pubbies running the party...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.