Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton: Drilling not the answer (The end of the campaign is near...)
5/25/08
Posted on 05/25/2008 10:04:14 PM PDT by Libloather
Cannot post - link only -
The Beast
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; drilling; hillary; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
She's toast.
To: Libloather
“Drilling is not the answer”
What an *sshole.
2
posted on
05/25/2008 10:07:05 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: Libloather
Hillary, please leave Bill out of this.
3
posted on
05/25/2008 10:08:05 PM PDT
by
Mark
(Don't argue with my posts. I typed while under sniper fire..)
To: Libloather
4
posted on
05/25/2008 10:08:24 PM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: Libloather
Hillary Clinton: Drilling not the answer That's why Bill "outsourced"...
To: Libloather
"We would get much more out of our investments if we were to have higher mileage cars and fast-track investment in biofuels of all kinds, looking to see what we can do for energy efficiency." Just another shallow answer from a Leftist liberal kook.
"Biofuels, high milage cars" are what have precipitated this crisis (Yes, this is a real crisis for once). This is the sort of thinking that is leading the country to disaster. Hillary doesn't have any idea what is happening in the country and she doesn't give a damn anyway.
6
posted on
05/25/2008 10:18:26 PM PDT
by
StormEye
To: FormerACLUmember
For hundreds of women, her husband thought drilling was the answer.
7
posted on
05/25/2008 10:19:14 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: FormerACLUmember
Smartest woman in the world is one dumb bunny.
8
posted on
05/25/2008 10:22:14 PM PDT
by
pankot
To: StormEye
"We would get much more out of our investments if we were to have higher mileage cars and fast-track investment in biofuels of all kinds, looking to see what we can do for energy efficiency."Our investments???!!! The oil companies are begging Congress to allow them to explore and make investments in the huge swaths of the US closed for exploration. From their viewpoint investing in say drilling in ANWR is a lot better then investing in that scam ethanol. Of course in PIAPS's mind the gov't should be controlling everything and there is no such thing as "mine" but always "ours".
9
posted on
05/25/2008 10:23:04 PM PDT
by
C19fan
To: FormerACLUmember
All the Dems/Dims say that. I have been writing to Maria Cantwell. That is her reason for not supporting an increase in the oil supply.
10
posted on
05/25/2008 10:27:03 PM PDT
by
Parmy
To: Libloather
Well, we’ve certainly proven that NOT drilling is not the answer - what’s left, Oh Smartest Woman in America?
11
posted on
05/25/2008 10:38:19 PM PDT
by
Redbob
(WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: Parmy
The idiots in the democrat party won't do a d@mn thing to help Americans struggling to pay bills.
Building nuclear power plants and drilling for oil in Alaska and elsewhere are two premier ways to cut down on high energy prices.
If the incompetent and inept democrat b@st@rds want to stand in the way of increased energy production and subsequently destroy the Nation, they are surely succeeding thus far.
They should all be arrested, tried and convicted with public endangerment at the least. Add charges of treason to Pelosi and Carter for certain. Dangerous fools, all.
a
12
posted on
05/25/2008 10:49:58 PM PDT
by
Prole
(Pray for the families of Chris and Channon.)
To: Prole
The Republicans controlled the House, the Senate, and the White House for 6 years and did nothing. Shouldn’t they be held accountable also?
13
posted on
05/25/2008 11:42:48 PM PDT
by
FFranco
To: FFranco
Ummmm, for the most part Republicans were FOR drilling in ANWR, (’cept for RINO’s like Lincoln Chaffee, etc.) but they didn’t have enough majority votes to do what should have been done LONG ago.
But the media didn’t report that or that hypocrats even recently shot down drilling anywhere...IN FACT, the Chinese are going to drill in the Gulf of Mexico for oil, but not the U.S.
Sooooooo ugly oil derricks will dot the gulf in increasing numbers but they’ll NOT be benefitting us!
It’s ALWAYS been liberalism. It’s a dangerous and irresponsible disease!
14
posted on
05/25/2008 11:56:45 PM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing-----Edmund Burke)
To: Libloather
Vote for communists, you get communism. Why the shock?
15
posted on
05/26/2008 1:02:06 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
(Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
To: FormerACLUmember
Drilling is not the answer Hillary and McCain both say that drilling is not the answer.
16
posted on
05/26/2008 2:58:13 AM PDT
by
trumandogz
("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
To: C19fan
Wait a minute. I think Congress and the Bunny Huggers would let us invest our money in “Green Technology” (i.e., personal methane recycling (ala the SF fart sniffing genre), solar energy (for Seattle), and a host of other high efficiency feel-good technologies).
17
posted on
05/26/2008 3:08:47 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
(President John McCain: A Bridge Too Far (for conservative principles, that is))
To: StormEye
When a socialist uses the words “we” and “investments,” it means the government will confiscate “wealth” from “me” to spend at their discretion.
18
posted on
05/26/2008 3:21:20 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Now that we use our corn for fuel, when do we eat coal for dinner?)
To: Libloather
"Hillary Clinton: Drilling not the answer" Putting her fat ass in the White House isn't the answer either.
19
posted on
05/26/2008 4:03:05 AM PDT
by
Enterprise
((Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!))
To: Prole
If the incompetent and inept democrat b@st@rds want to stand in the way of increased energy production and subsequently destroy the Nation, they are surely succeeding thus far. They also asked President Bush to go to the OPEC nations - which he did - and beg them to increase output so the price would come down. If increased output by OPEC will bring down the oil price, why won't increased domestic production do the same?
20
posted on
05/26/2008 4:51:51 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Typical white person, bitter, religious, gun owner, who will "Just say No to BO (or HRC).")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson