Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats’ Admit: Saddam’s Regime Harbored Al Queda
Flopping Aces ^ | 06-10-08 | Scott Malensek

Posted on 06/10/2008 9:24:59 AM PDT by Starman417

Hours after Senator Clinton dropped out of the race, and the news cycle was swamped with never-ending coverage of the inevitable doing the inevitable something was released under the radar.


Back in 2004 the Senate Intelligence Committee began an investigation into pre-war intelligence regarding Saddam's regime, the threat it posed, and how the intelligence was handled. Democrats on the committee did their best to politicize the investigation and give it the appearance of a precursor to impeachment of President Bush under some sort of Bush Lied conspiracy theory. They did this for purely political purposes despite being contrary to national interests. Again and again the committee came out with report after report. Each report showed that the problems with pre-war intelligence regarding Saddam's regime was not some grand conspiracy by a President who can barely read a teleprompter, but rather the result of bad intelligence from agencies that were as on the ball in 2002 and 2003 as they were on 9/11/2001; they were out of touch, undermanned, ill-equipped, budget constrained, and bureaucratically strangled.

In October of 2006, on the eve of the midterm elections, Senate minority leader Harry Reid pulled a big political PR stunt and ordered the doors of the Senate closed to discuss the classified elements of the investigation. Publicly, he claimed it wasn't a stunt, but rather that the Bush Administration was holding up the committee's report to avoid embarassment and to skew the upcoming elections. In those elections, Democrats took over the House, the Senate, and the Committee, then...instead of releasing it, they sat on it for almost two years. Why? Because they didn't want the reality to make the news: that it was Democrats who were deliberately misleading the American people about the casus belli for the invasion of Iraq: the threat of an Iraqi/Al Queda WMD attack on the United States.

Now, when everyone else was watching Hillary's 1/2 hour speech again and again and again, on 3 cable networks and every other news outlet, the Democratic-controlled committee released the final report on pre-war intelligence about Saddam's regime. In that report...they finally admit that YES

Saddam's regime was in fact harboring Al Queda groups and leaders, meeting with Al Queda groups and leaders, and more.

(Excerpt) Read more at Flopping Aces ...

TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; alqaedainiraq; democrats; iraq; prewarintelligence; saddam

1 posted on 06/10/2008 9:24:59 AM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line.”
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998-Truth!
This was a quote from President Clinton during a presentation at the Pentagon defending a decision to conduct military strikes against Iraq.

“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998-Truth!
Bill Clinton went to the Pentagon on this occasion to be briefed by top military officials about Iraq and weapons of mass destruction.
His remarks followed that briefing.

“Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998-Truth!
This is a quote from Albright during an appearance at Ohio State University by Albright, who was Secretary of State for Bill Clinton.

“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998-Truth!
This was at the same Ohio State University appearance as Madeline Albright.
“We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998-Truth!
According to the U.S. Senate website, the text of this letter was signed by several Senators, both Democrat and Republican, including Senator John McCain and Joseph Lieberman.

“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998-Truth!
The text of this statement by Nancy Pelosi is posted on her congressional website.

“Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999-Truth!
This was from an appearance Albright made in Chicago.
She was addressing the embargo of Iraq that was in effect at the time and criticism that it may have prevented needed medical supplies from getting into the country. Albright said, “There has never been an embargo against food and medicine. It’s just that Hussein has just not chosen to spend his money on that. Instead, he has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction, and palaces for his cronies.”

“There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001Truth!
The only letter with this quote from December 5, 2001 that we could find did not include the participation of Senator Bob Graham, but it was signed nine other senators including Democrat Joe Lieberman.
It urged President Bush to take quicker action against Iraq.

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.”
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002-Truth!
These were remarks from Senator Levin to a Senate committee on that date.

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002-Truth!
This and the quote below was part of prepared remarks for a speech in San Francisco to The Commonwealth Club.

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002-Truth!

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002-Truth!
Part of a speech he gave at Johns Hopkins.

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.
We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons...”
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002-Truth!
On the floor of the Senate during debate over the resolution that would authorize using force against Iraq.
He was urging caution about going to war and commented that even though there was confidence about the weapons in Iraq, there had not been the need to take military action for a number of years and he asked why there would be the need at that point.

“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force— if necessary— to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002-Truth!
Senator Kerry’s comments were made to the Senate as part of the same debate over the resolution to use force against Saddam Hussein.

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002-Truth!
Senator Rockefeller’s statements were a part of the debate over using force against Saddam Hussein.

“He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do” Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002-Truth!
Senator Waxman’s contribution to the Senate debate over going to war.

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002-Truth!
Senator Clinton acknowledged the threat of Saddam Hussein but said she did not feel that using force at that time was a good option.

“Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...”
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003-Truth!
In a speech to Georgetown University.

2 posted on 06/10/2008 9:27:29 AM PDT by dfwgator ( This tag blank until football season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I’m convinced the only reason Hillary voted yes on taking out Sadaam was because she knew she could divide the nation over the war issue. It worked, but she didn’t figure on Obama!

3 posted on 06/10/2008 9:28:51 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Quick, somebody forward this to Brian Williams. /s

4 posted on 06/10/2008 9:30:41 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
How can you tell when a democRAT is lying?

His/Her lips are moving:-()

5 posted on 06/10/2008 9:30:50 AM PDT by geo40xyz (McCain or Obama! possibility of 4 Supreme Court Justices, Gore @UN. The WINNER is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417


6 posted on 06/10/2008 9:31:03 AM PDT by ocr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I have that in a word doc on all my PCs and laptops.

It is titled, "How Democrats Lie".

7 posted on 06/10/2008 9:31:39 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The secret of Life is letting go. The secret of Love is letting it show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

President Bush should talk about this and make it news.

To NOT do that would be foolish of the President.
This puts Democrats on the defensive.

8 posted on 06/10/2008 9:31:50 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Traitors lie, someone should die.

9 posted on 06/10/2008 9:32:23 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geo40xyz

“How can you tell when a democRAT is lying?”

They registered as a Democrat.

See the tag line. It never changes.

10 posted on 06/10/2008 9:35:24 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aflaak


11 posted on 06/10/2008 10:49:48 AM PDT by r-q-tek86 (If you're not taking flak, you're not over the target.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

bump article and post 2

12 posted on 06/10/2008 10:57:20 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("In Israel, the President hit the nail on the head. The nails are complaining loudly." - John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator; Starman417; NormsRevenge; elhombrelibre; Allegra; SandRat; tobyhill; G8 Diplomat; Dog; ...

Excellent Post and article.

13 posted on 06/10/2008 11:49:42 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

It’s obvious to even the most disinterested layman or woman that Hussein harbored terrorists including A-Q. The libs at the CIA know this. Their goal, by denying the truth, is to destroy Bush. Therefore the truth must be trivialized, ignored, or lied about.

14 posted on 06/10/2008 12:59:43 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I went to the link and what I read doesn’t support the comments about the report being vindication of the AQ link. Just the opposite. Wish it were so, but I wouldn’t get too vocal about the content just yet. Bond, the Vice Chair says it’s a bunch of partisan crap, but there doesn’t seem to be anything helpful to the long simmering debate about the connection.

15 posted on 06/10/2008 3:37:34 PM PDT by Hartlyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If McCain can keep his brains together there is so much ammo he can use to show the American voter they had been had by the L/MSM and the Democratic Party and they would be better off electing him into office to keep us safe.
Will he do it? Guess we shall see over the next few months what type adds his crew puts together.
16 posted on 06/10/2008 6:04:25 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Duncan Hunter was our best choice...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; 2ndDivisionVet; Tennessean4Bush; justiceseeker93; FARS; AdmSmith; Berosus; ...

Thanks Ernest!

17 posted on 06/10/2008 10:52:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ( updated Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson