Posted on 06/13/2008 4:44:01 AM PDT by shrinkermd
An apology from the 9th Circuit judge for his computer collection of porn isn't necessary. He just needs to say, 'So what?'
...Judge Alex Kozinski's statements about the stash of sexually explicit images he collected and that the public (until this week) could view on his website have been varied, although not necessarily inconsistent: He thought the site was for private storage and offered no public access (although he shared some of the material on the site with friends). People have been sending him this stuff for years (implying that it just accumulates, like junk mail). He might accidentally have uploaded the photos and videos when intending to upload something else. His son did it
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
It's an abomination that this fruit sits as a judge over the rest of us in the land our families fought and died for.
LA Times at it again. Defining degeneracy down.
The dog ate my hard drive....
Substitute a prominent conservative judge’s name and see what the Lost Intelligence Times would have written.
He is a prominent conservative judge.
I could care less that this judge had this material or even that he had a private collection of stuff that he thought was funny because of its outlandish nature.
However, the fact that he placed this material online is incredibly stupid. He in effect made it public to children by doing so.
Get a sock drawer for crying out loud Kasinski!
Says who?
The LA Times?
The good news is, this isn’t the only reason to remove him immediately from the bench forever.
The bad news is, this isn’t the only reason to remove him immediately from the bench forever.
IMPEACH.
Are you serious? Kozinski is, hands down, the best judge in the Ninth Circuit and certainly among the best judges in the nation, and that includes the folks on the Supreme Court. He is thoughtful, deliberate, intelligent and a clear (and often funny) writer. We need more Kozinskis, not less.
He's one of the greatest judges in the nation. No surprise most freepers know nothing about him.
Anyone remotely familiar with the federal judiciary.
This guy was one of the great hopes to be a conservative supreme court justice
Kinda makes you wonder what kind of porn the writers of this editorial have on their hard drives.As if we didn’t know.
He didn't. His son did.
Well said.
I hadnt heard that.
Still, Its an incredible blunder.
Thanks for that information. One way to look at is in Freudian terms. He said, more or less, “...when it comes to women all men are stupid...”
So he had a legit website that handled Email and folks sent the material to that website thinking it wasnt in the public section?
Yep, it's a blunder. It's embarrassing, particularly considering some of the material that was there. It was not garden variety porn. But that's just what it was--a blunder; they thought it was private and it wasn't. It's an embarrassing mistake, but it's nothing to get panties in a twist over, so to speak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.