Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Swift-Boat or Not
Time Online ^ | Thursday, Jun. 12, 2008 | MICHAEL KINSLEY

Posted on 06/13/2008 10:02:28 AM PDT by nikos1121

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: nikos1121

Kinsey has always, and will continue to be, a far left liberal ass.


21 posted on 06/13/2008 10:59:51 AM PDT by billva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“John Kerry’s honorable service...”

Bull. He was and is now a traitor.

That he is an elected Senator is a disgrace, and the people that elected him or even live in the same state should be ashamed of themselves.


22 posted on 06/13/2008 11:09:06 AM PDT by alarm rider (Peace! through superior fire power....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Kinsley is simply trying to reinforce the liberal mantra that "Swift-boating" involves falsehood. When you figure that you have complete control over what words mean you get to try to do this, which is one reason the liberal control of the media has proven so advantageous to their party.

Not this time, Michael. In the words of a prominent Democrat named Truman: "I don't give 'em hell. I tell 'em the truth and they think it's hell."

23 posted on 06/13/2008 11:09:17 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Swift-boat is shorthand for the brilliant, despicable Republican campaign strategy in 2004 that turned John Kerry's honorable service in Vietnam into a negative factor in his campaign.

It wasn't a Republican campaign and nothing the Swift Boat vets said was ever refuted so Kerry's service is highly suspect and his post-Vietnam behavior was arguably treasonable.

SwiftBoatVets

I suggest that Kinsley knows this and is lying.

24 posted on 06/13/2008 11:18:51 AM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider
Bull. He was and is now a traitor.

And oh by the way.....where is that release that he was going to sign for his service record. Dollars to doughnuts that he got a BCD or a Dishonorable Discharge. The one he likes to advertise was signed during the Carter administration.

25 posted on 06/13/2008 11:22:26 AM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121


Time mag, and Kinsley are liars.
26 posted on 06/13/2008 11:23:09 AM PDT by roses of sharon ( (Who will be McCain's maverick?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
No...no.... no.... he's just got the word order wrong.

It's not: "Swift-boat is shorthand for the brilliant, despicable Republican campaign strategy in 2004 that turned John Kerry's honorable service in Vietnam into a negative factor in his campaign".

It's supposed to say: "Swift-boat is shorthand for the brilliant, honorable Republican campaign strategy in 2004 that turned despicable John Kerry's negative service in Vietnam into a factor in his campaign".
27 posted on 06/13/2008 11:27:45 AM PDT by conservativeharleyguy (Democrats: Over 60 million fooled daily!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
John Kerry's honorable service in Vietnam

LOL. It was so honorable that someone from the Harvard Law School admissions committee said he wasn't admitted because his less than honorable discharge would disqualify him from practicing law.

28 posted on 06/13/2008 11:46:40 AM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Kerry's honorable service in Vietnam...

Again. John Kerry promised Tim Russert 38 months ago that he would release his original DD 214. He has never done so. Less than honorable perhaps?

29 posted on 06/13/2008 11:58:02 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

And it was not a Republican dirty trick. The SBVFT was a bipartisan effort. It had nothing to do with partisan politics in terms of the motivation of the Swifties. It was about the country not the Rep party.


30 posted on 06/13/2008 12:01:23 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FFranco
There are websites questioning McCain’s military service and his behavior while at the Hanoi Hilton. These haven’t got much attention from the mainstream media yet, but as the campaign heats up they will become more prominent.

I hope they do. It will backfire. There is a big difference between being imprisoned for five years, and filming yourself looking like a dork for three months. One is easy to poke holes in. One is not.

Let me follow up that observation with the statement that McCain is a dips*@t, that is either dumb enough or cynical enough to push Al Gore's AWG agenda. Add in the fact that he can't tell the difference between the Grand Canyon and ANWR, and he gets my vote only because the alternative is so incredibly horrendous.

31 posted on 06/13/2008 12:14:11 PM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Don’t sweat this dweeb. It’s just Weasel Kinsley looking for a corner to pee in...


32 posted on 06/13/2008 1:09:00 PM PDT by tubebender (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
I just had to write Michael Kinsley on this bit of tripe:

Editors: Please forward my comment to Michael Kinsley, author of this piece of incredibly biased journalism.

Michael: You may think the dishonor resides with the Swift Both Veterans for Truth. That is certainly your right.

In actuality, John Kerry or his campaign never refuted one allegation made by the Swift Boat Vets. The one thing he could do to refute their charges, release his entire Navy record by signing "Form 180" he has refused to do. This despite repeated calls by responsible journalists and partisans of both sides to do so.

John Kerry's problem was brought about by a mainstream media's refusal to look closely at his record, both of accomplishments in the political arena and his questionable claims of accomplishment in Vietnam. It was left to the Swift Boat Vets to pose appropriate questions about the latter. The fact that several of Kerry's superiors, as well as all but a few of his fellow Swift Boaters joined the effort was telling. Your effort to denigrate these brave men is beneath contempt.

A similar problem is about to reoccur in the current Presidential campaign. The mainstream press has steadfastly refused to pose legitimate questions about Barrack Obama's background - his associates, his early political activities in Chicago, his upbringing in Indonesia, his liberal record in the Senate.

America will not elect someone who conceals his background and history. In a man with a record of accomplishment as thin as Senator Obama's, it its crucial to know where he came from, who and what influenced him and the detail of policies will champion.

If the press does not fulfill its traditional role of vetting the candidates, you can fully expect the blogosphere to fill the gap - doing the job that the Swift Boat Vets did in 2004.

Hopefully your editors will no longer countenance your whining when you fail to do your job and some responsible group of individuals does it for you. I will proudly donate liberally to such a group, as I did to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

Sincerely:

Probably did nothing mor than make me feel better, but that was enough.

33 posted on 06/13/2008 2:29:27 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativeharleyguy
>>>No...no.... no.... he's just got the word order wrong.<<<

I vote your post as "Turn of Phrase of the Day!"

Nice work....

34 posted on 06/13/2008 2:32:20 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HwyChile
>>>It was the best political campaign contribution that I have ever made. <<<

My sentiments exactly. If every dollar I have donated to politicians was as effective as the money I gave to the Swift Boat Vets, this nation would not be in the mess it is in!!!

35 posted on 06/13/2008 2:35:53 PM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

Thank you, thank you. I’ll be here all week......


36 posted on 06/13/2008 2:38:16 PM PDT by conservativeharleyguy (Democrats: Over 60 million fooled daily!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: conservativeharleyguy

Yes!!!!!!


37 posted on 06/13/2008 7:24:28 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Obama is a post turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

Hey, I feel better having posted this and all of you have made me feel better from your comments...

Thank you

Nikos


38 posted on 06/13/2008 7:27:05 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Obama is a post turtle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121; Howlin; eddie willers; cajungirl; wirestripper; Southflanknorthpawsis; Peach; ...
My letter to TIME:

Dear Sirs:

In his recent article, “To Swift-Boat or Not,” Michael Kinsley asserted – without providing evidence – that the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth were part of President Bush’s re-election campaign. In fact, a comprehensive two-year Federal Election Commission investigation found that the group “did not unlawfully coordinate its activities… with any federal candidate or political party committee.”

Mr. Kinsley also labeled the Swift Vets “despicable” and accused the veterans of “fundamental dishonesty” – again, without any justification for such smears. In fact, the Swift Vets won the key debates in 2004, showing that John Kerry was not illegally ordered into Cambodia as he had repeatedly claimed, that some of his Vietnam injuries were accidently self-inflicted, and that his heroic “No Man Left Behind” story bore little resemblance to the event recalled by a dozen eyewitnesses. The veterans also successfully countered Kerry’s infamous 1971 claim that US troops had committed atrocities in Vietnam “on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command.”

Despite the best efforts of the Kerry campaign and its media supporters, many voters found the Swift Vets credible and their evaluation of John Kerry relevant. A key reason was the group’s ability to back its charges with evidence.

It’s an approach Mr. Kinsley might want to consider.

Scott Swett

Scott Swett is the primary author of To Set The Record Straight: How Swift Boat Veterans, POWs and the New Media Defeated John Kerry.

39 posted on 06/17/2008 11:34:37 AM PDT by Interesting Times (Swiftboating, you say? Check out ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Excellent letter Scott... Thanks for the ping.


40 posted on 06/17/2008 11:43:55 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson