Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HYBRID VEHICLE OWNERS REPORT ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS... strong electromagnetic currents!
ncpa.org ^ | June 19, 2008

Posted on 06/19/2008 1:44:33 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch

Purchasers of hybrid vehicles, which are subsidized by the federal government and championed by environmental activists as a way to reduce gasoline consumption, are trading in their vehicles because of health fears concerning electromagnetic fields created by the hybrid batteries, says John Dale Dunn, a policy advisor for the American Council on Science and Health.

As noted in an April 27 article in the New York Times:

Some hybrid vehicle owners are complaining of a variety of health problems allegedly caused by strong electromagnetic currents from the cars' batteries. Reported ailments and concerns include rising blood pressure, drowsiness behind the wheel and higher leukemia risks. Various agencies, including the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute, acknowledge the potential hazards of long-term exposure to a strong electromagnetic field (E.M.F.), and have done studies on the association of cancer risks with living near high-voltage utility lines. Drivers who have given up their hybrids have reportedly documented "dangerously high" electromagnetic fields, leading them to conclude driving the vehicles is not worth risking blood for oil. This issue illustrates the double standard regarding environmental activists, says H. Sterling Burnett, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis.

"Environmental activists routinely use the Precautionary Principle as a weapon against technologies and products they do not like," Burnett explains. "They assert that until and unless a product they oppose can be definitively proven to be safe, the product must be banned. Now, however, when consumers and some scientists assert that one of the activists' pet products may be causing serious health harms, the activists act like they have never heard of the Precautionary Principle."

Source: John Dale Dunn, "Hybrid Vehicle Owners Report Adverse Health Effects," Heartland Institute, July 1, 2008; and Jim Motavalli, "Fear, but Few Facts, on Hybrid Risk," New York Times, April 27, 2008.

For text:

http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=23393

For Times text:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/automobiles/27EMF.html

For more on Environment Issues:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=31


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; health; hybrids; transportation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-211 next last
To: Gaffer

Yeah, I am seriously intrested in a hybrid for my next car but the savings just aren’t there as far as I can tell. You merely transfer costs.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4930471


61 posted on 06/19/2008 2:22:03 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

And as I always say on these threads, my 1990 Geo Metro gets 52 or 53 MPG at a steady 55, assuming no big hill climbs or head winds!


62 posted on 06/19/2008 2:26:20 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

Laywers - start your engines!


63 posted on 06/19/2008 2:27:52 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

I’d suggest taking out a large life insurance policy on her based on this story.

Just tell her you love her if she asks why.


64 posted on 06/19/2008 2:27:55 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

And use your cell phone in your hybrid and you are just asking for your head to explode instantly.


65 posted on 06/19/2008 2:28:41 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
Some hybrid vehicle owners are complaining of a variety of health problems allegedly caused by strong electromagnetic currents from the cars' batteries. Reported ailments and concerns include rising blood pressure, drowsiness behind the wheel and higher leukemia risks.

And how did they experience the symptom of "higher leukemia risks"?

And did they measure their blood pressure while driving? Wouldn't that tend to raise your blood pressure?

Now, if you fell asleep at the wheel, and were looking for an excuse, I guess this one's as good as any. Someone might buy it, even though the measured EM field inside a Prius is not a real issue.

I wonder if any of these drivers has a car compass?

66 posted on 06/19/2008 2:28:56 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“The way I see it, they haven’t found any adverse health effects from an MRI machine (which has one kickass EMF),”

Are you sure? From what I’ve heard a lot of the people who go into an MRI are found to have some severe health problems.


67 posted on 06/19/2008 2:30:10 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua

Only if they are not trained. Otherwise they would know that they cannot get zapped prying the doors open, or frankly get zapped doing anything else with the car, other than unplugging the power cable and sticking metal blades into the plug.

Even if the battery was somehow shorted to the car, it wouldn’t be grounded, and there would be no danger.

Just as current cars have one battery wire connected to the metal frame, but you can’t even get the tiniest little shock touching the car, even though if you short out the battery you can melt through a screwdriver.


68 posted on 06/19/2008 2:31:57 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

But after all of these years and millions of people who ride subways every day that run on around 750VDC, the hybrid cars on 200-300VDC systems are causing the problems. Right.


69 posted on 06/19/2008 2:32:59 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melinda

Yes, if there was any truth to this, there would need to be a warning. There is no warning required.


70 posted on 06/19/2008 2:33:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
BACK TO THE FUTURE !
71 posted on 06/19/2008 2:33:45 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

i know you cannot believe everything in the iNtErNet,but http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/18/automobiles/18HYBRID.html


72 posted on 06/19/2008 2:35:39 PM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
Hawww hawww hawwwwwww!!!

Compare and contrast this with cel phones, flourescent bulbs in the office, high tension wires overhead, and some etcetera's.

Congress will have to pass a bill demanding insulated seats ... 'cause they damn sure ain't gonna' repeal any laws that squeezes the manufacturers for 'protection' money.

73 posted on 06/19/2008 2:35:54 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

...and what happens if they talk on their cell phones while driving the hybrid? Will their head explode??


74 posted on 06/19/2008 2:36:12 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
Can it get stupider?

It usually does, doesn't it?


Actually, they can. After all, they are part of the crowd that likes to be scared and like to scare others about made-up environmental issues, such as "global warming".

But, since they are so easily duped, why don't we start a rumor about how the electric and hybrid cars, because of all their batteries and wires, are like lighting rods which attract lighting bolts in thunderstorms. That'll really scare them out of their hybrids.
75 posted on 06/19/2008 2:36:56 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

pure garbage.


76 posted on 06/19/2008 2:37:33 PM PDT by steveo (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I like the way you think!


77 posted on 06/19/2008 2:37:33 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

See 74—I did not see your post before i posted mine. Swear.


78 posted on 06/19/2008 2:39:01 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
higher leukemia risks

This is a set-up for a lawsuit, nothing more.  Obviously, there is no such existing condition that manifests itself as "higher leukemia risks."  This is tantamount to me saying, "If I put on some Brut (by Faberge), I have a higher risk of my wife giving me a certain type of job tonight."  Not likely, and actually, ridiculous.  Chief Complaint: Higher leukemia risks.  Call yer frickin' lawyer, not the doctor.

79 posted on 06/19/2008 2:39:10 PM PDT by Harrius Magnus (I am the town square.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

If you have a question, you should ask me.

The answer is easy. We have three children and live at the end of a minimally maintained road on top of a hill in an area that gets frequent snow.

A honda accord would be useless to us. She used to buy over 200 gallons of gasoline a month in her old SUV. She now drives a hybrid SUV that gets over twice the MPG.

You’re right, if you don’t mind driving an econobox, a hybrid does not make sense. We needed 4 wheel drive, room for five plus two dogs and did not want to go broke filling the tank.

Honestly, if you did not believe me, why did you not address your post to me?


80 posted on 06/19/2008 2:39:30 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson