Posted on 06/26/2008 10:58:41 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
S&W has since changed ownership and has disavowed any agreement that they had with the clintonista. They are good to go now.
Glad ,too, as they make some of the finest firearms made.
I’d guess that you will NOT vote McCain. Am I right?
What? Be careful what you assume. Who else is there to vote for in order to keep Obama out? Of course I am voting McCain but like many others on this forum I view him as the lesser of two evils.
I stand corrected. No offense to the FReeper S&W enthusiasts intended
I thought you might be a one issue voter when you responded to me with “Smith and Wesson?” I found that to be somewhat arrogant. Thanks for your response. I, too, will vote McCain for your same reasons. We stand together fighting the bastards, FRiend.
;)
=#
Unkus
I did not intend to come off that way and I apologize for that. I am so darn disgusted with the shape this country is in (and where it is headed) and why we can’t field ANY legitimate, sane leaders who will stand up for the people instead of the special interests. I know that sounds naive but where is the leadership that is not tainted by the beltway?
What part of CO do you live? I was born and raised near Trinidad.
Best to you and all MFO
Myself, and most people I know draw the line at weapons not possessed by the infantryman.
1. Assault Rifles (with automatic fire capability): Yes.
2. Belt fed machineguns: Yes.
.....
....
...
..
.
99. Nuclear Weapons: No.
I don't see that at all. It specifically says a class of weapons cannot be banned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.