Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creationist Bill Signed by Jindal
LGF ^ | June 27, 2008

Posted on 06/27/2008 2:04:21 PM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 481-491 next last
To: Stultis

I’m not a creationist. I think the concept of evolution is viable and believable.


101 posted on 06/27/2008 3:51:30 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: GourmetDan

Teacher: Okay Johnnie, can you tell me why you can light the end of that tube on fire when it comes from above the electrodes in the water?

Johnnie: God makes fire!

We need a separation.


102 posted on 06/27/2008 3:53:08 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Evolution is an emotional response to fear; a sickness, and is as far from science as darkness is from light.

This has projection written all over it. Go preach it to those Christian scientists who work on evolution.

103 posted on 06/27/2008 3:54:53 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Teacher: Okay Johnnie, can you tell me why you can light the end of that tube on fire when it comes from above the electrodes in the water?

Johnnie: God makes fire!

We need a separation.

Ditto...


104 posted on 06/27/2008 3:55:01 PM PDT by WVKayaker (You mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I think the concept of evolution is viable and believable.

I've got a sale on this week. Save $millions...


105 posted on 06/27/2008 3:57:28 PM PDT by WVKayaker (You mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
Nonetheless, that is what I think he meant.

Then it comes down to rejecting the assumption of any event actually having happened unless it was witnessed and recorded, regardless of the supporting evidence.

106 posted on 06/27/2008 3:58:09 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Not nearly enough.

http://www.usinnovation.org/state/pdf_stem/STEMEdLouisiana08.pdf


107 posted on 06/27/2008 3:58:49 PM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: JmyBryan
“Creationism” - which usually means,
YEC (young earth creationism) should not be taught in science/biology class.

I would definitely object to my child being taught that the earth is 6000 years old and that children played with dinosaurs - just for starters.

But then, I would also object to my children being led to believe that man is merely an animal. Those so-called science teachers who teach that, are teaching the religion of scientism, they aren't teaching science.

108 posted on 06/27/2008 3:59:06 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (Driving a Phase Two Operation Chaos Hybrid that burns both gas AND rubber.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
LGF = Little Green Footballs

I like to be able to know the source when I am browsing through Latest Articles and I often can't tell when they are abbreviated.

109 posted on 06/27/2008 3:59:41 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

I don’t know, its probably just me, but I aint accepting the idea that straw men arise from spontaneously rotting meat.

But I will accept the idea that science has conclusively proven that the Earth is not flat, is not the center of the universe, nor held up by a giant turtle. Moreover, the foregoing notwithstanding, and nevertheless, neither do things fall off the world when they travel beyond the edge of the map; eveon so the region beyond the map may be the region of dragons and stuff.

Furthermore, I believe science has had its say about the type of cheese that the moon is made of too.


110 posted on 06/27/2008 3:59:59 PM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
...commonly accepted idea... more of the same...

If that's a strawman, then we need to purge that from the history books. What do you think we'll have left by the time we're done with this little exercise in calling everything a strawman?

111 posted on 06/27/2008 4:02:02 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
I think the concept of evolution is viable and believable.

I've got a sale on this week. Save $millions...

pic missing from first post!

112 posted on 06/27/2008 4:03:39 PM PDT by WVKayaker (You mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
They’ll learn science if they study Intelligent design

The goal of the Discovery Institute is to use the evangelical philosophy Intelligent Design to convert more people to Christianity. Not exactly appropriate for the science class.

113 posted on 06/27/2008 4:11:37 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; GourmetDan; GodGunsGuts
"May as well think that stars are holes poked in the box that God put us in that allows the light of heaven to shine through."

So, Einstein, Infield, Hoyle, Born, and Ellis are just ignorant, superstitious charletans?

In your hopeless quest to appear oh so scientific, you consistantly make a fool of yourself.

114 posted on 06/27/2008 4:12:37 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Do you contend that Einstein, Infield, Born or Ellis are geocentrists?

Do you contend that they believe that the stars are holes poked in a box?

115 posted on 06/27/2008 4:23:52 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
. What do you think we'll have left by the time we're done with this little exercise in calling everything a strawman?

The entire evolution argument is a strawman for atheism. There is no fact involved. It is speculation, and assumption. Your arguments about gravity and astronomy, physics and mathematics, all assume things that can be proven true. That some theists are able to accept ID, is aquiescence to "junk Science", IMHO.

Geology studies rocks and the earth constructions, but doesn't have a clue where they came from. They speculate, but that's just another name for GUESS. To believe that some inorganic "something", somewhere, found a specific opportunity to become organic, to adapt to conditions, and then metamorphize billions of times in only billions of years? Plus, all that brings us to the present state we live?

That is your ultimate argument, if you construct evolution backwards, and is as absurd as it sounds. Nothing became something. Inorganic became organic. Organic single celled became multi-celled complex. Man is just an accident, requiring zillions of permutations (where did I put those things, dammit?) and really has no meaning. Ergo, there is no need for morals nor objectivity. Depravity doesn't exist, it is just evolutionary process.

"In the beginning, God..." makes a whole lot more sense to me. But, if you're angry at God, think you know something more than most of us, or just want to disprove His Being, I'd like to see some proof, not the foolish liturgy of the evolutionary philosophers... I can call my dog "science". That doesn't make his farts smell any better...

I won't wait up.

116 posted on 06/27/2008 4:24:22 PM PDT by WVKayaker (You mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: allmendream; GourmetDan
"And what force, pray-tell, moves the sun around the earth?"

Is your cognition really that limited? You cannot understand that all motion can be accurately described in an infinite number of different coordinate systems? You don't realize that the origin can be arbitrarily placed anywhere, without changing anything?

117 posted on 06/27/2008 4:28:14 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Jimmy Carter is the skidmark in the panties of American History)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
Geology studies rocks and the earth constructions, but doesn't have a clue where they came from. They speculate, but that's just another name for GUESS.

Then where does your Bible tell us would be a good place for long term storage of nuclear waste?

118 posted on 06/27/2008 4:30:31 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
Did you mean that evolution is a “Trojan horse” for atheism? A straw-man for atheism? Does that even make sense? Lets see.....

straw-man: A straw man argument is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.

So atheists put forth a misrepresentation of evolution? Those that say it rejects/denies God certainly do. Is that what you meant? Somehow I don't think so.

119 posted on 06/27/2008 4:31:19 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Nizkor.org-
Fallacy: Straw Man

Description of Straw Man

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person’s actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of “reasoning” has the following pattern:

1. Person A has position X.
2. Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
3. Person B attacks position Y.
4. Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.

This sort of “reasoning” is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.
Examples of Straw Man

1. Prof. Jones: “The university just cut our yearly budget by $10,000.”
Prof. Smith: “What are we going to do?”
Prof. Brown: “I think we should eliminate one of the teaching assistant positions. That would take care of it.”
Prof. Jones: “We could reduce our scheduled raises instead.”
Prof. Brown: “ I can’t understand why you want to bleed us dry like that, Jones.”

2. “Senator Jones says that we should not fund the attack submarine program. I disagree entirely. I can’t understand why he wants to leave us defenseless like that.”

3. Bill and Jill are arguing about cleaning out their closets:
Jill: “We should clean out the closets. They are getting a bit messy.”
Bill: “Why, we just went through those closets last year. Do we have to clean them out everyday?”
Jill: “I never said anything about cleaning them out every day. You just want too keep all your junk forever, which is just ridiculous.”


120 posted on 06/27/2008 4:34:58 PM PDT by WVKayaker (You mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 481-491 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson