Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jizya, Jihad, and the Murder of Archbishop Rahho
American Thinker ^ | June 28, 2008 | Andrew G. Bostom

Posted on 06/28/2008 3:59:37 AM PDT by Man50D

The New York Times (June 26, 2008) has published a somber account of the recent murder of Iraqi Archbishop Rahho, and how the Iraqi Christian population has been subjected to the full recrudescence of dhimmitude, punctuated by the re-application of the jizya-the Koranic (Koran 9:29) poll tax on non-Muslims, whose etymology, as per the seminal Arabic lexicographer, E.W. Lane, belies its origins: "the tax paid in lieu of being slain."

Here is a classical formulation of the jizya -- the cornerstone of the repressive system of jihad-imposed dhimmitude -- from, coincidentally, a seminal Baghdadian jurist, al-Mawardi (d. 1058). In his monumental The Laws of Islamic Governance, al-Mawardi examined the regulations pertaining to the lands and infidel populations subjugated by jihad. This is the origin of the system of dhimmitude. The native infidel "dhimmi" (which derives from both the word for "pact", and also "guilt" -- guilty of religious errors) population had to recognize Islamic ownership of their land, submit to Islamic law, and accept payment of the Koranic poll tax (jizya)-the tax paid in lieu of being slain-based on Koran 9:29. Al- Mawardi notes that:

"The enemy makes a payment in return for peace and reconciliation... Reconciliation and security last as long as the pavment is made. If the payment ceases, then the jihad resumes."

The "contract of the jizya", or "dhimma" encompassed other obligatory and recommended obligations for the conquered non-Muslim "dhimmi" peoples. Collectively, these "obligations" formed the discriminatory system of dhimmitude imposed upon non-Muslims -- Jews, Christians, [as well as Zoroastrians, Hindus, and Buddhists]-subjugated by jihad.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqichristians; islam; radicalmuslims; rahho
Islam is not a religion but more accurately is a violent political ideology tantamount to Nazism and needs to be addressed in the same manner as Nazism was during WWII. The following article reinforces the goal of Islam.

Islamic Scholar Warns U.S. of 'Two-Faced' Muslims
1 posted on 06/28/2008 3:59:38 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Unfortunately, enforced dhimmitude is sought by the US government
DESPITE the 911 Atrocities.


2 posted on 06/28/2008 4:24:20 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

...Or in other words, a false teaching that cloaks itself as a religion.


3 posted on 06/28/2008 4:30:29 AM PDT by Biggirl (A biggirl with a big heart for God's animal creation, with 4 cats in my life as proof. =^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

It’s a combination of violent political ideology and Mafia family that should be subject to the RICO act. Mohammed was a bandit, and his followers are the same.


4 posted on 06/28/2008 5:05:31 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Where is our esteemed leader on this matter?

He who wants to bring freedom and democracy for Iraq.

Oh, how foolish of me, the "freedom and democracy" does not apply to Christians or people of faiths other than Mooslimbs.

Likewise, Condi-Clueless and the entire State Dept. (no surprise here) has also been as quiet as a church mouse and much to my chagrin, our Military as well.

Of course one must consider that all of the above are more interested in maintaining the facade that Islam is basically a "religion of peace" and mustn't say or do anything to upset the sensibilities of the Moozies--even at the expense of allowing genocide to be committed openly and without fear of reprisals by anyone, anywhere in the world.

As an aside, where or where is the hypocritical Human Rights Watch watch and why is the Vatican not speaking out forcefully?

5 posted on 06/28/2008 5:30:18 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Reagan defeated the military ambitions of Soviet fascism.Unfortunately,Stalinism was by then firmly rooted in the American Liberal Democrat and the international left.So the fall of the USSR was an important yet nonfatal setback for the evil of socialism.
Bush defeated the military ambitions of Islamist fascism.Unfortunately,Islamofascism,a nonsecular clone of Stalinism in that it also hates both freedom AND America,is now firmly rooted in the politically correct protected classes of the American Liberal Democrat and the international left.The fall of Taliban Afghanistan and Saddam Iraq are an important yet nonfatal setback for the evil of socialism.

Slogans like Remember Pearl Harbor,Remember The Alamo and Remember The Maine,though benificial to either or both American security and advancement,had their functions.
On the other hand,Remember 9/11,thanks to the left and their stranglehold on the ignorant American,has become as useless and anachronistic as Remember Where I Tied My Horse.


6 posted on 06/28/2008 5:54:01 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Misera contribuens plebs!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Pelosi undermining President Bush in Syria.


7 posted on 06/28/2008 7:36:21 AM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson