Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slapshot68; itsahoot; Lion Den Dan
This is the law...read it. http://www.theodora.com/ina_96_title_3.html Read all of Section 301

Wrong.

This is the current statute which does not apply to persons born before November 1986 as set out in post #211.

213 posted on 07/02/2008 7:47:23 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: David

Ok what part of Sec. 1401(g) was in place when Obama was born?

http://law.onecle.com/uscode/8/1401.html

“(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years:”


214 posted on 07/02/2008 8:07:37 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

To: David

It doesn’t matter...he was supposedly born in Hawaii, which has been a U.S. territory since 1898. That fact alone makes him a natural born citizen. No subsequent amendments has altered that condition.

The section we were previously discussing referred to “a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions.” Any amendments to this section are irrelevant to the discussion.

Now if turns out that he really WASNT born in Hawaii, then he’s got a problem.


217 posted on 07/02/2008 8:32:45 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson