Pat Buchanan is not “archconservative”. He is an antisemitic Nazi-sympathizing dhimmi.
No argument there, Solid Wood.
I agree Pat is not archconservative. However, neither is he a Nazi sympathizer nor anti-semitic. (Though I wouldn't argue with applying the word broadly to some of his earlier writings.)
When you boil down this new thesis, it is simply that Winston Churchill should never have promised Poland that England would go to war to save it from the Nasties, since it was a cold certainty that England would be unable to do so. He takes it a step further, and says Churchill should not have promised it even if England could have delivered on the promise.
“Pat Buchanan is not “archconservative”. He is an antisemitic Nazi-sympathizing dhimmi.”
Amem. My punch-in-the-face-upon-sight-list are:
1. Jane Fonda
2. Pat Buchanon
3. Jimmy Carter, depending if it is a federal crime or not.
4. Michael Moore
Strangely, they all hate Israel.