Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Americanwolf

TR was wildly popular and could easily have won a third term in ‘08, but he had promised to step down after two, and he honored that promise. He was disappointed in Taft, so he ran again in ‘12.


77 posted on 07/12/2008 3:24:23 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: karnage
I do remember that from history books somewhere...
He was a man of his word in that sense... and I think it further illustrates the point that he was a far cry from being a fascist...
79 posted on 07/12/2008 3:27:49 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Don't Think a cop will help? Try calling a crack head next time......!! Thanks Thorin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: karnage

He only won just one term in 1904, but served the bulk of McKinley’s term. Had he run in 1908 instead of Taft, undoubtedly he would’ve, rather than his cousin, established a “Presidency-for-Life.” I believe he was a singularly unique war fetishest (perhaps the one and only President in the history of the Republic to have such a fetish) and would’ve charged off to intervene in the War in Europe the day after it broke out (indeed, WW1 was probably one war we could’ve easily stayed out of with little difference in the outcome — unlike WW2 and Buchanan’s bizarre fantasies). My father best described TR succinctly, “He was a nut.”


82 posted on 07/12/2008 3:47:25 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson