Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The American Physical Society Owes Lord Monckton an Immediate Apology
American Thinker ^ | July 19, 2008 | Marc Sheppard

Posted on 07/19/2008 11:49:32 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: neverdem

That’s exactly the letter Lord Peter Wimsey would have written, had he taken a First in Physics, rather than History, at Oxford. I have not yet looked at the Viscount’s educational background, but I’m about to.


21 posted on 07/20/2008 6:00:26 AM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Classics at Cambridge, followed by journalism at Univeristy of Cardiff. Interesting family - his grandfather was one of Edward the VIII’s advisors during the abdication.


22 posted on 07/20/2008 6:08:17 AM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; CygnusXI; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

23 posted on 07/20/2008 6:21:28 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I simply don’t believe this. Scientists never engage in politically-motivated slugfests. They always pursue the absolute, verifiable Truth, through repeated experimental testing of hypotheses and rigorously honest evaluation of empirical data. When a scientist makes a pronouncement, we know that it owes nothing to the fashions of the time, to his political or philosophical beliefs, or to the source of his research grant.


24 posted on 07/20/2008 6:32:33 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. We're basking - how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

I love this man’s sentence structure ... so few can use multiple semicolons correctly. Is he cute? Is he married?


25 posted on 07/20/2008 6:35:36 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. We're basking - how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Is he married?

Yes he is, and YOU are too, as am I. But damn! can he write or what?

There's probably something wrong with us if we think well-written paragraphs are hot.

26 posted on 07/20/2008 7:04:00 AM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
There's probably something wrong with us if we think well-written paragraphs are hot.

Excellent grammar is a sign of genetic superiority :-).

27 posted on 07/20/2008 7:45:22 AM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. We're basking - how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Black Marks for the Red Cross (Is this a racist title?)

Problems Persist With Red Cross Blood Services

Asia's Deadly Counterfeit Drugs

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

28 posted on 07/20/2008 9:07:51 AM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video - back on the net!! (click here)

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



29 posted on 07/20/2008 9:59:26 AM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

ping


30 posted on 07/20/2008 10:00:50 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for posting this demand by Monckton.

I’m glad he is getting tough and active about this.

His paper a tremendous refutation of the IPCC. I am amazed that the APS is getting themselves so politically involved in this issue. They have clearly strayed outside of their mandate to report hard science. This issue has caused this physicist to lose respect for the organization. It is going to take a long time for me to recover that respect.


31 posted on 07/20/2008 10:10:12 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nipfan

It’s a radio recording, so there is no visual component other than MS media player “video noise”.


32 posted on 07/20/2008 10:32:10 AM PDT by Don W (To write with a broken pencil is pointless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; nina0113
There's probably something wrong with us if we think well-written paragraphs are hot.

Excellent grammar is a sign of genetic superiority :-).

You two are just suckers for well-hung punctuation... /gd&r*

(*grinnin', duckin' & runnin')

33 posted on 07/20/2008 10:51:03 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
There's probably something wrong with us if we think well-written paragraphs are hot.

No, because a well-written paragraph is like an intelligent, beautiful woman of high moral quality: both are exceedingly rare and show everything else up for the dross that it is. Monckton's writing makes Algore's bloviating look like one of the John Kerry in drag pictures from 2004.
34 posted on 07/20/2008 10:55:35 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

It’s all in how the commas are placed.


35 posted on 07/20/2008 12:31:52 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. We're basking - how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

Lord Monckton is Catholic, and he seems like a lot of fun. However, based on the one picture I could find of him (on a Czech blog), he is not cute, even for a 56-year-old Britisher. On the other hand, he would probably say the same about me based on my pictures available online :-).


36 posted on 07/20/2008 12:50:49 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. We're basking - how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

If you google-image him, you get a lot more. He looks a bit like Rowan Atkinson, who’s attractive without being particularly handsome. The humor and intelligence in the eyes are big selling points.


37 posted on 07/20/2008 2:08:03 PM PDT by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

I must have used the wrong search. On a second try, I got more pictures. Quirky, and probably appealing in real life, in a way ... but not cute, exactly.


38 posted on 07/20/2008 2:11:13 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Tax-chick's House of Herpets. We're basking - how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
Both Al Gore and Rachel Carson should be tried for crimes against humanity or genocide...IMO that is the least that should be done. The Enviro Nazi’s need to be laughed at and ridiculed for their idiotcy and criminal results just like the Stalin & Mao democides...100’s of millions murdered by tyrants!

Beyond the difficulty imposed by the fact that Rachael Carson is dead, I doubt that a fair jury could convict either of them. One essential principle of justice is that a person cannot justly be convicted of any crime beyond the level of a civil infraction if one could not reasonably have known the action was unlawful. For what particular actions should Al Gore have been convicted? Bear in mind that if a substantial portion of the population would believe an action to be legal, it would be hard to prove that Al Gore could not reasonably have believed it so.

39 posted on 07/20/2008 3:27:08 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There must be a pony in here somewhere.

AGW debates by non-scientists quickly degenerate into "Your beliefs suck!", "No, your beliefs suck!" Not informative. AGW debates by scientists degenerate into "My equations are better than your equations," but those equations are informative only to the few people with the background, time, intelligence, energy, and interest to evaluate them.

I dislike the smug AGW true believers and their anti-capitalist solutions, but I still want to know if AGW is occurring, and if it poses a significant threat to humanity. If the answer to both questions is yes, then I want to know what solutions are most practical.

Monckton has repeatedly offered to debate Algore, but I bet I would learn more by watching him debate Andrew Dessler. Algore is an idiot, Dessler is not, and at this point I don't know what to make of Monckton.

40 posted on 07/20/2008 3:35:17 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson