Posted on 07/24/2008 4:19:19 AM PDT by dascallie
Important people are not called to account for their transgressions.
Second Clinton sniper shot in a week? (The first being the Edwards/Enquirer gottcha.)
Is this a real group with standing to file a real complaint or just kiddies with keyboards?
I smell clinocchio and the beast in this.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Gee, I am so surprised, he has never been known for veracity problems. The next thing you know he will be accused of flip-flopping on the issues.
Nah, it’s ROVE!
I swear that guy would be omnipotent if he were responsible for half the crap the dems credit him for.
Hilery’s Operation Brutus?
Drip, drip, drip... It's funny that there was another thread how the Clinton's have been awfully quiet lately.
Those RACIST bastards!! Trying to keep a brother down.
This is interesting. Also- for what it’s worth- Obama has let his law license lapse in Illinois.
Like that's gonna happen.
This sounds trivial and carping at this point. It makes his critics seem small.
Yes, it is of a piece with Obama’s (and actually Democrats in general) character, but charges will be viewed as minor by most voters and bringing them up at this late date will cast him as victim.
And yet let’s remember the brouhaha made over GWB’s National Guard record and papers...
Actually- if it’s proven he lied on his bar application it’s a big deal.
Morning, SE Mom.
It seems that the filer of the complaint has remained anonymous. I give the usual credence to things that are done anonymously.
Is it the Clintons chipping away? Maybe.
Well, combined with the continuing Larry Sinclair (no matter what you think of Sinclair...he is dogged and unwavering in his claims of illegal crack cocaine use in 1999 and other unsavory Obamantics.....(see his site—updated daily...http://larrysinclair0926.com/)
...it all starts to build a pattern......
I thought so too- EXCEPT- keep scrolling down on the site here:
http://factsfirstok.blogspot.com/
About one third down the page is this:
~snip~
In response to question 18, it is understood the Respondent answered
“no.” The Respondent did not disclose his multiple drug use occurring
through his time in high school and college.
...
On December 17, 1991, Respondent was admitted to the practice of law
in Illinois. At no time prior to his admission to the Illinois bar,
did Respondent apprise the Illinois Character and Fitness Committee of
his involvement in illegal drug activity. If he had been caught he
likely would have been charged with criminal possession of a
controlled substance in the fifth degree which is a class D felony.
New York Penal Law Sec. 220.06 (McKinney).
The following individuals have personal knowledge of, or access to
documentation of these facts:
William Shaheen, Esquire
Shaheen & Gordon, P.A.
P.O. Box 977
140 Washington Street, 2nd Floor
Dover, NH 03821-0977
(603) 749-1838 fax
(603) 749-5000 phone
wshaheen@shaheengordon.com
~snip~
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.