Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Mara Georges fronting for Richard Daley and the Chicago Gun Grabbers.

Willful ignorance of the Constitution is no excuse, Mara.

1 posted on 07/24/2008 3:05:03 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: stanley windrush; BartMan1; Nailbiter; Forecaster; Lurker; SJackson; bang_list

Daley Says no to Heller.


2 posted on 07/24/2008 3:05:59 PM PDT by IncPen (We are but a moment's sunlight, fading in the grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

gun ban will follow obama. get ‘em while you can.


3 posted on 07/24/2008 3:07:02 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (bweed'n dee boo bow shaaaboood'n dee feee-oooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
“Georges tells Aldermen the Supreme Court’s decision on Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban shouldn’t apply to Chicago, because previous Supreme Court rulings have said Second Amendment “right to bear arms” doesn’t apply to local governments, like Cities. She says D.C. is a federal jurisdiction.”

This is just so ignorant on so many fronts. I'm just amazed at the stupidity of your average dimocRAT. These people are just as dangerous as Al Queda.

4 posted on 07/24/2008 3:09:22 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

She’s self deluded.


5 posted on 07/24/2008 3:09:51 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

Counsel: Confident (Chicago) Gun Ban Will Continue to Kill More Citizens


9 posted on 07/24/2008 3:26:37 PM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

Where did Mara Georges go to law school? Since when can a local government pass a law that trumps the federal constitution? What an idiot.


10 posted on 07/24/2008 3:27:19 PM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

Amazing arrogance on the part of the fascist Chicago gun grabbers.

The Constitution applies to ALL of America, including the major cities.


11 posted on 07/24/2008 3:35:29 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Four members of the U.S. Supreme Court don't understand the words "shall not be infringed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

And when it doesn’t hold the city will change two words for close synonyms, call it Revamped and noisily “pass” it to start the process all over again. A new office is created for the lawyers who have to be hired to defend the city’s gun law in court and taxes will have to go up to pay for it.


12 posted on 07/24/2008 3:37:10 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
Georges tells Aldermen the Supreme Court’s decision on Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban shouldn’t apply to Chicago, because previous Supreme Court rulings have said Second Amendment "right to bear arms" doesn’t apply to local governments, like Cities. She says D.C. is a federal jurisdiction.

She may have a point. When was the last time Chicago was a part of America?

13 posted on 07/24/2008 3:37:47 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
What he means by "hold", they'll enforce it as a form of government sanctioned terror, and if he wanders through the courts long enough, maybe Barack Hussein Obama will have appointed a Justice or two, and Heller will be overturned. In the meantime, the Law of the Land is the Law of the Land, exclusive of Chicago.

Of course all this litigation costs nothing, the cost being borne by taxpayers who need not be considered.

14 posted on 07/24/2008 3:38:53 PM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama will not be coming to us, I don't know why, Spokesperson US military hospital Landstuhl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
have said Second Amendment "right to bear arms" doesn’t apply to local governments, like Cities.

Is this woman a retard>

16 posted on 07/24/2008 3:55:38 PM PDT by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
Supreme Court rulings have said Second Amendment "right to bear arms" doesn’t apply to local governments, like Cities.

In other words, she's saying the constitution doesn't apply in cities.

17 posted on 07/24/2008 4:03:03 PM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

Yeah, good luck with that Mara...something tells me the twin anvils of reality and the Bill of Rights are going to provide an entertaining clue by four for the collection of idiots running Chi-Town.


19 posted on 07/24/2008 4:47:16 PM PDT by Braak (The US Military, the real arms inspectors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
Georges tells Aldermen the Supreme Court’s decision on Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban shouldn’t apply to Chicago, because previous Supreme Court rulings have said Second Amendment "right to bear arms" doesn’t apply to local governments, like Cities.

So which Supreme Court rulings would those be, counselor?

And under your line of reasoning, the rest of the Bill Of Rights don't apply to local governments either, despite years of SCOTUS incorporation.

What an ignoramus!

20 posted on 07/24/2008 5:03:15 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

Murder, rape and kidnapping must be legal on Federal property then.

No wonder D.C. has such a problem.


21 posted on 07/24/2008 5:54:59 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Vote against the dem party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

I suppose if Chicago would like to secede from Illinois and/or from the Union, then the Heller decision wouldn’t apply. Let’s face it, the rest of the state of Illinois would probably welcome such a move. Maybe DC, SF, NY and LA can leave also. No big loss.


23 posted on 07/24/2008 7:57:15 PM PDT by ohioarmedneutrality (Never mess with a Quaker armed with a semi-automatic rifle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
City Corporation Counsel Mara Georges has told two City Council committees she’s confident Chicago’s law will stand.

What else would she say? Anything else and like Stalin, Hizzhonor Da Mayar would find someone with who did not exhibit such an "insufficient degree of optimism". (That phrase was actually used by a project manager to my first mentor, who "fired" him from the project. In the end, the mentor was proved correct.)

25 posted on 07/24/2008 10:06:14 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen; All

Here is the new philosophy by city attorneys: (most of whom are generally incompetent lawyers to start off with. They are political appointees who could not get a job in the real world or are just using the post to further their own political careers)

“Its all legal untill a judge says otherwise”

IOW city attorneys hold to the notion that they do NOT have to look at the constitution (state or federal) or the law untill someone says they can do it. Untill then the city generates history where they can say “see the law is working”. It is akin to the illegal adoption cases where an illegal adopting parent says “we had the kidnapped child so long we get to keep them.”

Instead of working to fix the law (less expensive more popular option), they instead work to presearve the unconstitutional law.

Obviously this lawyer had flunked consitutional law and the whole series of case law that had the bill of rights apply to the states. By her argument slavery is still legal as a state issue.


26 posted on 07/25/2008 4:42:44 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen
What this Daley lackey is saying in effect is the U.S. Constitution doesn't apply to 'cities'. Know I know Daley thinks he's King but this is 'commit him to a rubber-room stat' stuff.

And IMHO Chicago's 36 pages of gun laws in size 2 font goes a tad beyond any sane person's definition of 'reasonable restriction'.

27 posted on 07/25/2008 5:11:14 AM PDT by Condor51 (I have guns in my nightstand because a Cop won't fit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

I hate Chicago Nazis


29 posted on 07/25/2008 8:52:00 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Truthism Watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson