Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats' Energy Charade
WSJ ^ | July 29, 2008 | MICHELE BACHMANN

Posted on 07/29/2008 5:06:02 AM PDT by xcamel

Earlier this month the House of Representatives voted on an energy bill called the Drill Responsibly in Leased Lands (Drill) Act. The good news, for those of us who actually want to do something to lower gas prices, is that it failed.

The bad news is that Democrats will try again before the November elections. We can expect more legislation that claims to increase production, but in reality offers a framework of heavy regulation, litigation and union rules that could prevent new energy supplies from getting to market. And we can expect legislation that would likely hamper current oil and gas exploration.

Consider the details of Drill. It would not have opened new lands to energy exploration. Instead, it would have increased the number of lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve -- the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's (ANWR's) sister territory on Alaska's North Slope -- from one lease sale every two years to one every year. The problem here came in the fine print. The bill would have mandated that leasing be done in an undefined, "environmentally responsible" way.

--snip--

Ms. Bachmann, a Republican congresswoman from Minnesota, recently returned from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anwr; congress; democrats; drilling; elections; energy; oil; rats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Nails it...
1 posted on 07/29/2008 5:06:03 AM PDT by xcamel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Our Congress people need to get on TV and expose this fraud for what it is, and point the finger at the Dems. The reason the economy is in such bad shape is the Dems’ longstanding opposition to drilling.


2 posted on 07/29/2008 5:09:52 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

If you like $5/gal, Thank Congress in Nov.

Pray for W and Our Troops


3 posted on 07/29/2008 5:15:18 AM PDT by bray (Drill Congress!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Michele just recapped this article on Bill Bennett’s show.


4 posted on 07/29/2008 5:18:00 AM PDT by G Larry (I'm investing in "Pitchfork Futures"!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

The oil companys will not be drilling any dry holes on purpose any time soon..


5 posted on 07/29/2008 5:27:30 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

6 posted on 07/29/2008 5:30:03 AM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Our Congress people need to get on TV and expose this fraud for what it is, and point the finger at the Dems

Pointing the finger at the Dems is meaningless, since the would-be finger pointers were in charge for twelve years and did less than nothing.

Even now, the GOP caucus is split right down the middle on actions that would actually do any good.

7 posted on 07/29/2008 5:36:49 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When He rolls up His sleeves, He ain't just puttin' on the Ritz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

There are several conservatives who can point the finger. That’s the game the Dems play, and they do it very successfully. Remember when they trotted Murtha out to attack the Iraq War policy? All you need is one to do it. Bush has been pushing for drilling at ANWR since 2001. The Dems have been taking credit for blocking it. The Dems launched an investigation of Haliburton in order to divert attention from the energy problem, and to derail Bush’s energy plan. Now they’ve got to pay the price, and the only way that will happen is if the GOP takes it to them.


8 posted on 07/29/2008 5:50:42 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

“The reason the economy is in such bad shape is the Dems’ longstanding opposition to drilling.”

You forgot nuclear, coal-to-gas, shale oil, coal mining and on and on.

In general the bureaucracy and extremist environmentalism embraced by the Left are the reasons that most companies moved offshore in the first place. Most of our trade deficit, which is the greatest threat to our economy and sovereignty, comes from those policies. It is time they were plainly exposed as the anti-American forces they are.

To show you how truly insane they are, major solar projects in the West are now being tied up for years while environmental impact studies are conducted. :-P


9 posted on 07/29/2008 5:57:27 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

You conveniently forgot some RINOs in the Senate like Collins, Coleman and Snowe.

Collins and Coleman are up for reelection this year and I hope they go down.


10 posted on 07/29/2008 6:04:16 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

I don’t hope they lose. That will mean two more Dem Senators to deal with.


11 posted on 07/29/2008 6:07:32 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The reason the economy is in such bad shape is the Dems’ longstanding opposition to drilling.

and how about all the Republican Presidents and GOP Senators and House members that elected to keep the Offshore Drilling Ban in place from 1981 to 2007?

Are they to blame?

12 posted on 07/29/2008 6:12:51 AM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Yes they are, but gas was less than $1.50 a gallon back then so the impact on the economy was drastically less.


13 posted on 07/29/2008 6:27:19 AM PDT by anoldafvet (Is this what Obama voters consider change. A change of position on every issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet

Even back then, everyone knew that oil was a finite resource and that demand for oil in the developing world as well as the industrialized world was increasing.

That being the case, why is it that each of the Democrat and Republican presidents and Congresses since 1981 elected not to renew the Offshore Drilling Ban 26 times?

These would include years when the GOP controlled the White House the House and the Senate.


14 posted on 07/29/2008 6:34:05 AM PDT by trumandogz ("He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and it worries me." Sen Cochran on McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

But they are complicit in keeping our energy prices high. Watch this fall as the Maine Senators cry for heating oil credits out of my pocketbook to pay for their constituents. Unconscionable as at the same time they stifle us from pursuing our energy needs.

They should be paying MORE for their energy if they refuse to drill, not less.

The lesser of two evils is still evil.....


15 posted on 07/29/2008 6:34:37 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Sure, but not as much as the Dems. The GOP made the judgment that it would be easier to get approval to drill at ANWR than offshore, so that’s where they concentrated their firepower. I can’t say I disagree with that strategy. At the time, the Alaskans wanted to drill in Alaska. There were no other states that wanted offshore drilling, so any fool would have realized that such an effort was doomed to fail. Now the tables are turned. Florida and other states have indicated a willingness to allow offshore drilling, so it’s time for the GOP to shift gears on that, which is what they’ve done.

Meanwhile, the Dems continue to oppose all drilling, even though several states have indicated that they want drilling off their shores.


16 posted on 07/29/2008 6:37:10 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: anoldafvet
Yes they are, but gas was less than $1.50 a gallon back then so the impact on the economy was drastically less.

There was no way offshore drilling, clean coal or more nukes would have passed with oil under $2gal. The Watermelons control the flow of information on this subject.

17 posted on 07/29/2008 8:02:03 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Barack Hussein Obama=Jimmy Carter Part Douche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The problem is that he doesn't push hard enough. There is a 3-minute presentation on YouTube called "The Truth About ANWR". So, it would take him 15 minutes to address the nation on TV, and provide the necessary visuals, explain safe drilling technology, how much gas and oil is up there, and what is at stake.

He is surrounded by a small army of staff, cabinet, and various advisors. Yet, none of them can figure out what some obscure guy on YouTube has figured out. It's maddening.

18 posted on 07/29/2008 8:32:41 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

I don’t really think so. The ANWR debate has been going on for a long time. It preceded Bush, Clinton, Bush I... When Reagan was President, we had similar problems. When Carter was President, we were fighting over the trans Alaska oil pipeline which the environmentalists assured us would cause the caribou to become extinct.

They’ve been pushing, but it doesn’t work because the people have not been behind them—until now.


19 posted on 07/29/2008 10:18:08 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

By the way... I have been predicting for years that this effort to block oil drilling would blow up in the Dems’ face. It only made sense. At some point, you’ve got no choice but to drill. The real question is whether the Dems will make an about face and begin pushing for drilling after the election. They are such demogogues that I would not be surprised. They’ll probably blame the GOP for delaying the drilling.

For now, though, they are going to try to hold it together. Flipping on this issue before the election would just open them to ridicule.


20 posted on 07/29/2008 10:22:39 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson