[EdReform]

For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.

[TWohlford]

“For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.”

Well, I’ve yet to see a cyclist do enough damage to require the insurance. However, I do agree that bicyclists who disregard the law — including the hard-core guys who seem to think that a paceline negates any legal requirements — should get tickets, and they should count as points on their licenses.

[Doohickey]

You’re kidding right? This is still FREE Republic, isn’t it?

[Osage Orange]

For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.

Well heck...why stop there...you should just make EVERYONE simply using public roadways subject to the same.

[netmilsmom]

Please don’t make me pay for insurance for the huge amount of time I spend on my bike. Maybe twice a year on the road.

We do the bike paths. I have a hubby, two girls with me and a dog in a front basket. It’s recreational. Period.

So that we could go on the side streets to get to the Dairy Queen, I would need insurance? Oh please.

[trumandogz]

For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.

You have just outed yourself as a Liberal by advocating more Government Regulation and more Taxes.

I am sure the Democrats could use you as a Block Captain for the upcoming Election.

[zeugma]

For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.

Wow. And here, I thought I was on FreeRepublic.

[fightinJAG]

For those 18 and over who cycle on public roadways, licensing and liability insurance should be mandatory.

I agree.