Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sig226; yarddog; Nachoman; 1066AD; BenLurkin; Gandalf_The_Gray; calex59; Armedanddangerous; ...

Whaddya think?


4 posted on 07/29/2008 7:38:54 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Thig crioch air an t-saoghail, ach mairidh gaol 's ceol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre

Be glad to try a sample :)


19 posted on 07/29/2008 8:08:30 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre
I was going to post the schematic of it, but knarf already posted it. It's an interesting idea. There are similarities to lever action rifles and tube fed shotguns.

The biggest problem I perceive is the claw thingie that grabs the cartridge from the magazine and elevates it to feed into the chamber. It grabs the groove and pulls the cartridge from the back of the magazine. The leaf spring at the junction of the tang and the backstrap appears to help elevate the cartridge.

It looks like a rotating barrel lock up, similar to the Beretta 8000 series locked breech handguns. That works, so there's no question about the theory, but did they execute it properly?

The next question is the integrity of the claw thingie. This is not a good way to use steel. The claw has to be a flat piece of steel with a hook at the end. The steel would tend to fail where the hook meets the flat area.

Someone will say that 9mm extractor claws work just fine after 20,000 rounds have been fired, but that comparison is not correct. The slide moves backward with the velocity of the cartridge. The extractor has to extract an empty case, which already has inertia due to recoil. The case is moving backwards under its own force. This part has to move a loaded cartridge which does not have energy due to recoil.

A loaded cartridge has about five times the mass of an empty one. Multiplying forces by factors of five makes a big difference. Then there's the motion, which I am not going to calculate because it's late at night.

I'm interested to see how this turns out. It's certainly not the usual action design, and appears to be worth investigating. It is also noteworthy that if it works, the design could be made to ensure reliable feeding of smaller cartridges into larger chambers a la .38 Special into .357 Magnum. What the heck. They made semi autos for almost eighty years before Sig Sauer perfected them. :)

27 posted on 07/29/2008 8:44:41 PM PDT by sig226 (Real power is not the ability to destroy an enemy. It is the willingness to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre

Methinks their claims of “higher power and increased kinetic energy” will prove to be greatly exaggerated. Internal ballistics of like cartridges in like chambers tends to be, well, alike. The method of feeding will not have an appreciable effect upon the firing sequence, pressure, etc. The cartridge obdurates and seals to the chamber walls well before peak pressure is reached, so the blurb about escaped gas or pressure is poppycock.

I’m not saying that a shorter action is not a good thing, but their performance claims are bizarre.


35 posted on 07/29/2008 10:00:35 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson