CNN's Wolf Blitzer and his insightful L.A. quake commentary

CNN ^ | 7/29/08

[hole_n_one]

From the CNN transcript........

There's going to be some damage,
but not nearly as significant as a more
significant earthquake would have caused.

[hole_n_one]

I'm beginning to think my cat could do his job.......

There's going to be some poop,
but not nearly as much poop if
nobody bothered to clean my litter box.

[ikka]

Nothing gets past those sharp guys at CNN, huh?

[TexasNative2000]

That's Maddenesque.

"I think the team that scores the most points wins the game......"

[Patrick1]

That is why they call themselves “The Most Trusted Name in News”...LOL

[RandallFlagg]

ROTFLMAO!!!
You oughta send this to him!

[Retired Chemist]

I turned off Fox News Channel as they repeatedly showed video of a water leak thay thought might have been caused by the earthquake.

[LibFreeOrDie]

Or Wolf is channeling Yogi Berra...

[ken21]

he’s a moron and kiss ass.

and i wouldn’t watch him even if i had tv service.

[Texas Eagle]

Hmmmm...that's a thinker.

But, would there be less damage than if a less significant earthquake had hit?

[Ditto]

LOL.

Honestly, that's the problem with 24 hour 'Breaking News."

Talking heads have to talk for 24 hours, and even the smartest head in the world is going to say stupid things if they keep talking long enough.

The people we consider to be the smartest don't say much but they have thought about what they are going to say before they say it.

[Billthedrill]

I think I understand him. What Wolf is saying is that there isn't as much damage as there would have been had it been a bigger earthquake instead of a smaller earthquake, which causes less damage than a bigger earthquake because it's smaller, or at least the damage is smaller instead of bigger, which is sort of like the earthquakes themselves. In other words, if it had been a really big earthquake we'd have known it because there would have been more damage than there was, because it wasn't a bigger earthquake, it was a smaller one causing less damage than a bigger one. Which would have caused more damage.

I hope that helps.

[Jemian]

You gotta admit that he ain’t wrong on this. Nothing gets by those sharp news hounds.

[frankiep]

[hole_n_one]

That should be framed and hung on a wall.

[InvisibleChurch]

Wolf's replacement.

"snoopy pegro, weepy hambuglar!". "TYPE C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CMD.EXE"told it was Chinese) as "like][25][26][27][28][29][30] Pig Latin that only girls know".

[SoldierDad]

Just damn. It’s no wonder that CNN pays him the big bucks/sarc

[RDTF]

and he’s about the size of your cat

[Tannerone]

This guy’s IQ would match the number of toilets I have in my house (split level).

[my right]

Ah, they (MSM) are just trying to figure out a way to blame man made global warming for earthquakes. Ain’t no telling how many good ideas was zinging around in ole Blitz’s head when he uttered that profundity. Don’t worry that great deep thinker, Algore will no doubt feed them the answer any day now.

[dragnet2]

No you have it wrong Bill. I am sure Blitzer meant that there is going to be some damage but not nearly as significant as a
significant earthquake would have caused, but less than a more significant earthquake could cause, even though this earthquake was more significant than other less significant earthquakes.