Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
The FLDS doesn’t have to defend against polygamy, or polygamy (dang, that’s hard to spell), because so far, no one has indicted anyone for it.

One person was indicted for bigamy

58 posted on 07/30/2008 1:36:39 AM PDT by Soliton (Investigate, study, learn, then express an opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Soliton

You sir, are correct.

So, why choose to charge him with bigamy, instead of polygamy?

Are they legally the same thing, or is there a difference?

Did they have some reason for that choice?

I find it odd they went with bigamy, don’t you?


86 posted on 07/30/2008 7:18:21 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson