[Age of Reason]

I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.

Because she will have agreed to cooperate with the genetic strategy behind rape: the reproduction of the male’s genes.

[goodwithagun]

I don’t know what “genetic strategy” means, but the real reason for rape is control. Rape has nothing to do with sex. In fact, some rapists use objects (Jon Benet Ramsey).

My cousin was raped our freshman year of college. She was yelled at by the nurse at the hospital for refusing to take the morning after pill.

[kdot]

I see it a little differently. If a rape victim resists the urge to kill the baby (ie. abortion) and gives birth, she can find an adoptive home and try to bring some closure with life, not death. That could be an amazingly selfless and therapeutic response to something horrible that was exacted on her. It's an empowering option.

I also believe rape is an act of self-serving violence, not a strategy to procreate.

[Future Snake Eater]

I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.

Hell, I think it's possible she should be up for an honor killing!

What kind of nonsense are you spewing here?

[wagglebee]

I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.

I think that might be among the most convoluted logic I've EVER heard.

Because she will have agreed to cooperate with the genetic strategy behind rape: the reproduction of the male’s genes.

No, she will have agreed to spare an innocent life for the crimes of his or her father.

I personally know a little girl who was the product of rape, I can assure that her mother DID NOT "agree" to the crime:

Prayer Request for Rape Victim

[Popman]

I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.

Wow, that post didn't live up to your screen name

So if a murder victim donates their organs to save another life, they weren't really murdered?

[Popman]

Because she will have agreed to cooperate with the genetic strategy behind rape

I finished reading your post and fail to understand the concept of genetic strategy behind rape.

Rape is about power even more than sexual gratification, I have never heard of rapist who rape simply to produce offspring, unless you are a participate in the ROP

[Grizzled Bear]

I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.

And if, in the course of the 'alleged' attack, she is injured to the point of being comatose throughout the entire gestation and labor, and then later comes out of the coma, she ought to stab the kid in the back of the head and vacuum his brains out, just to prove she wasn't raped.--/EXTREME OFFENSIVE SARC

I'm guessing you have no sisters, wife or girlfriend.

[Grizzled Bear]

Because she will have agreed to cooperate with the genetic strategy behind rape: the reproduction of the male’s genes.

Oh, and the guys who murder their rape victims don't really rape them, since they aren't exercising the genetic strategy behind the rape: the reproduction of their genes.

[MHGinTN]

"I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.
Because she will have agreed to cooperate with the genetic strategy behind rape: the reproduction of the male’s genes." Rape is an act of violent dominance, most often. Trying to lipstick that pig with 'genetic strategy' is asinine. You completely miss the notion that the raped woman/female may not want to murder someone of absolute innocence as her response to the violence done to her. You might want to consider changing your handle at FR.

[Mr. Silverback]

Refusing to kill a small child for another person’s crime is not even remotely connected to “cooperating” with the criminal.

Your screen name is very, very inaccurate.

[wagglebee]

I know that at her request you removed xsmommy’s comment because she used a certain expletive (though this word is routinely used on TV and radio without consequence). However, I would like to point out that NO WORD is as offensive as Age of Reason’s suggestion and subsequent reaffirmation that if a rape victim becomes pregnant and has the child that she wasn’t really raped and the repugnant belief that she “cooperated” in the act.

[Scotswife]

“I think it possible that if a raped woman chooses to have the rapists baby, then that means she wasn’t truly raped.

Because she will have agreed to cooperate with the genetic strategy behind rape: the reproduction of the male’s genes.”

Did you smoke crack this morning?