Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexican trucking program to be extended for two more years
San Diego Union - Tribune ^ | 8/4/08 | Paul M. Krawzak

Posted on 08/04/2008 2:14:48 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – A controversial one-year program allowing Mexican trucks to travel deep into the United States will be extended for two more years, federal officials announced Monday.

John H. Hill, administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, said the extension would allow for the collection of more data to determine whether Mexican trucks can operate safely in the United States.

Opponents quickly denounced the move, which some had been expecting despite their protests that the program poses a danger on U.S. highways.

Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, accused U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters of continuing to “flout the will” of Congress.

He said he would push for the passage of legislation to shut down the program when Congress returns in September. Last week, Oberstar's committee approved a bill to end the program on a unanimous bipartisan vote.

Hill said federal law allows a pilot program to last up to three years.

“We intend this extension to reassure trucking companies that they will have sufficient time to realize a return on their investment, and we anticipate additional participation with this extra time,” he said.

Although the program allows up to 100 carriers from each country to participate, only 26 Mexican carriers and 10 from the United States have joined the program, which was set to end next month.

Hill said there have been no accidents or safety incidents involving Mexican participants in the program.

Opponents, including the Teamsters Union, contend that Mexican drivers are not held to the same safety standards as U.S. drivers.

The Bush administration began the program last September as the first step in complying with a provision of the North American Free Trade Agreement that requires opening the border to long haul truck traffic.

Congress passed a law last year to end the program, but U.S. transportation officials interpreted it as only applying to future pilot programs.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; extended; goodnews; mexican; mexicantrucks; nafta; trade; transprotation; trucking; trucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2008 2:14:49 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2055385/posts

Yea, I thought they were gonna shut it down.

White House Vs. Congress


2 posted on 08/04/2008 2:22:32 PM PDT by BGHater (Democracy is the road to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Hill said there have been no accidents or safety incidents involving Mexican participants in the program.”

Whatever! Do they have a magic shield?


3 posted on 08/04/2008 2:23:09 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Isn’t the ‘mexican trucking’ program part of the treaty ratified during the Clinton Administration? and didn’t the Supreme Court uphold the treaty?

just asking....


4 posted on 08/04/2008 2:26:10 PM PDT by griswold3 (Al qaeda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater; Liz

load ‘em up .. move ‘em out.


5 posted on 08/04/2008 2:28:10 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE toll-free tip hotline 1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRget!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: griswold3
No one has brought a case yet (to my knowledge) about the constitutionality of the Executive Branch implementing the conditions of a previously signed and ratified Treaty (in this case, NAFTA), despite the reservations expressed by a succeeding Legislative Branch. Depending on how the case would be brought, the biggest hurdle (in my opinion) would be proving that this is something other than a "non-justiciable political question."

In the cases in the past where the Supreme Court has been asked to rule on the constitutionality of NAFTA (with regard to State environmental regulations, and Fast-Track Authority, to name two occasions), it has found in favor of NAFTA.

6 posted on 08/04/2008 2:36:55 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

The Chinese company Cosco (which owns the Port Of Los Angeles) has been building two huge ports in Mexico for last several years.

How long before we see Mr Xinh Hou Chu with a Mexican commercial driving license.


7 posted on 08/04/2008 2:45:47 PM PDT by angkor (Conservatism is not now and never has been a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

oops . . . the Fast Track case never made it out of the 11th Circuit (the Supreme Court declined to hear the case).


8 posted on 08/04/2008 2:50:53 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pete-R-Bilt; glock rocks; tubebender

ping


9 posted on 08/04/2008 3:43:08 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Having custody of a loaded weapon does not arm you. The skill to use the weapon is what arms a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, one of the more pertinent facts to come out of the high gasoline prices is the fact that Mexico subsidizes the price of fuel, it is half the cost of US fuel.

That creates a advantage for the Mexican Trucking companies.


10 posted on 08/04/2008 4:16:31 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ Romans 10.10/Eze 11.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
John H. Hill, administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration...

Bush is still President, so his policy of whatever Mexico wants, Mexico gets is still in force.

11 posted on 08/04/2008 4:22:08 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; Pete-R-Bilt; glock rocks; SouthTexas
Congress passed a law last year to end the program, but U.S. transportation officials interpreted it as only applying to future pilot programs.

Judge and Jury?

12 posted on 08/04/2008 4:38:38 PM PDT by tubebender (Why does a round pizza come in a square box?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: angkor

exactly! with huge inter-country road/rail system through Canada,USA and mexico to go with it.just more,,BS that gets crammed down our throats against the will of the people.


13 posted on 08/04/2008 5:00:58 PM PDT by coalman (type to slow to be relevant,but I try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
John H. Hill, administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, said the extension would allow for the collection of more data to determine whether Mexican trucks can operate safely in the United States.

This is precisely why the Senate rejected this in 2007-insufficient data.

U.S. Senate Reject's DOT's Mexican Trailer Plan

14 posted on 08/04/2008 5:24:23 PM PDT by SouthTexas (Invert the 5-4 and you have no rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Hill said there have been no accidents or safety incidents involving Mexican participants in the program.

Uh-huh, just like the FDC said Mexico wasn't responsible for the salmonella outbreak.

15 posted on 08/04/2008 5:37:27 PM PDT by upchuck (As we doggedly march towards dystopia, my poor country is losing it's mind. God help us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Globalist bureaucrats protecting their jobs.


16 posted on 08/04/2008 5:47:58 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Having custody of a loaded weapon does not arm you. The skill to use the weapon is what arms a man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Actually the DOT looks the other way. The trucks are not even safe by any definition and there have been many accidents that are swept under the rug. The people can’t speak the language they can’t drive in bad weather and the trucks are a disgrace and if you or I tried to drive one through an inspection we would be taken out of service on the spot! I am driving over the road and I used to be a mechanic and yes we have a big problem in the works here.


17 posted on 08/04/2008 7:28:12 PM PDT by CowboyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: padre35

The also don’t pay the same taxes up here that American trucks are required to pay. They put three wanna be drivers in a truck and they rotate to keep the truck moving at far less compensation than you or I would make, I asked a DOT official about the three drivers and was told that (off the record) it was not right but there were no provisions under the law to stop the practice as long as there was a bunk for sleeping. One major “US” company is at this time hiring dispatchers who speak Spanish for the above reason.


18 posted on 08/04/2008 7:44:12 PM PDT by CowboyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

You don’t know how right you are. Two Mexican trucks were busted last winter in Colorado because they can’t drive in winter conditions and went off the road and they both were loaded with guess what “illegal aliens” oops.


19 posted on 08/04/2008 7:53:04 PM PDT by CowboyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas

You realize that you are posting to a slip-and-fall lawyer’s blog?


20 posted on 08/04/2008 10:07:29 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson