Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Lies about Obama’s Red Mentor
Family Security Matters ^ | August 5, 2008 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 08/05/2008 4:06:12 AM PDT by K-oneTexas

August 5, 2008

AP Lies about Obama’s Red Mentor

The influential Associated Press (AP) wire service has belatedly run a story about Barack Obama’s Marxist mentor without mentioning the smoking-gun evidence that the mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a Communist Party member. The dishonest story, which represents damage control for the Obama campaign, was written by AP writer Sudhin Thanawala.
 
AP is one of the largest news agencies and serves thousands of print and electronic media outlets.
 
Under the innocuous headline, “Writer offered a young Barack Obama advice on life,” the story calls Davis, a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) when it faithfully echoed the Stalinist line, merely a “left-leaning black journalist and poet” known for “leftist politics” and someone who might be accused by some of having “allegedly anti-American views.”
 
Davis was not a “journalist” in any real sense of the term. He was a propagandist and racial agitator for the CPUSA. He was also a recruiter for the communist cause.
 
Media Bias
 
The slanted AP story features quotes only from supporters or friends of Davis and Obama. But those picked to defend Davis are themselves interesting.
 
Ah Quon McElrath, identified as merely “a friend” of Davis’s and quoted by AP, was actually an organizer for the communist-controlled International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU). The ILWU was led by Davis’s friend and associate, secret CPUSA member Harry Bridges. Davis wrote for a newspaper, the Honolulu Record, which was controlled by the CPUSA and subsidized by the ILWU.
 
McElrath is quoted by AP as saying, “You could get a lot of strength from a person like Frank who had suffered all the discrimination...that a black man goes through in America.”
 
Davis went to Hawaii in 1948 after consulting with Bridges and Paul Robeson, another secret CPUSA member. He was a mentor to Obama during the years 1975-1979 and died in 1987.
 
Obama supporter Dr. Kathryn Takara is quoted in the AP piece as saying that “Frank was part of a group of black vanguard intellectuals.” Takara was the associate producer of a program about Davis that, like the AP story, ignored his CPUSA affiliation. So while she knows a lot about Davis, she seems blind to the evidence of Davis’s service to the communist cause.
 
In fact, Davis was a hard-core but secret CPUSA member with a history of involvement in CPUSA fronts who was so much of a Stalinist that he opposed U.S. participation in World War II during the Hitler-Stalin Pact, but then supported U.S. involvement after Nazi Germany invaded Soviet Russia.
 
Strangely, the AP article quotes John Edgar Tidwell, a University of Kansas professor who edited Davis’s books, as declining by e-mail an interview request because Davis has allegedly become the victim of a “McCarthy-era strategy of smear tactics and condemnation by association.” Tidwell knows that Davis was a secret CPUSA member and cites evidence in one of his books, including from one of Davis’s private letters, to prove it. Davis refused to deny his CPUSA membership as late as 1956, when a congressional inquiry had named him as a member of the communist underground.
 
So “McCarthyism” has become telling the truth about communists? Why has Tidwell taken such a low-profile during the presidential campaign when he should have so much to offer about Davis - and possibly Obama? Why the silent treatment?
 
The Big Question
 
Not surprisingly, AP leaves many major questions unanswered. The wire service notes that Frank Marshall Davis is referred to in Obama’s book Dreams From My Father “only as Frank.”
 
But why? What does Obama have to say about this curious omission? Could it have something to do with the fact that, by the time Obama wrote his book, he knew that Davis was a Communist? And that he deliberately covered this up? Or did he know it earlier?
 
This is the key question: What did Obama know and when did he know it?
 
Why didn’t AP ask this question? Was it afraid of the answer? Or did the campaign not want to comment?
 
There are more questions: Other than what was reported in Obama’s book, and by Davis’s friends and associates, what was the nature of the relationship between the two of them? Did Davis ever try to recruit Obama into the communist cause? Did Obama leave this out of his book, too?
 
AP does note that Davis was “an important influence” on Obama but doesn‘t mention Davis‘s communist views and how he took the Stalinist line before, during, and after World War II.
 
AP even uses the term “mentor,” noting that Obama “struggled to find mentors in his search for a black identity.” But the failure to mention that Davis was a Communist means that AP deliberately ignored the newsworthy significance of the relationship.
 
Davis “published several volumes of poetry,” AP said, failing to note that they include poems praising the Soviet Red Army and mocking Christian missionaries.
 
Strange Silence
 
AP quotes John Edgar Tidwell in a book as saying about Davis, “He made his vision into a beacon, a light shedding understanding and enlightenment on the problems that denied people, regardless of race, national origin or economic status, their constitutional rights.”
 
But AP doesn’t quote Tidwell as confirming that Davis was a Communist, a member of a political party funded and controlled by Moscow. And AP doesn’t note the evidence that Davis and his comrades tried to take over the NAACP in order to transform its Honolulu branch into a front for the Stalinist line.
 
What’s more, AP doesn’t note that Davis accused prominent black author Richard Wright of “treason” for breaking with and exposing the CPUSA.
 
“In spite of his writings,” AP says, “Davis scholars dismiss the idea that he was anti-American.”
 
Why not tell us what was in those writings? Like the private letter in the possession of Davis scholar Tidwell in which Davis tries to recruit a prominent poet to the CPUSA.
 
Which of course raises the disturbing questions that must be asked:
 
- Did Davis recruit Obama?
 
- Was Obama, like Davis, Bridges and Robeson, ever a secret CPUSA member?
 
- Could Obama’s possible secret relationship with the CPUSA help explain why the first person ever to publicly mention that “Frank” was Frank Marshall Davis, and that he had a relationship with Obama, was Gerald Horne, a writer for a CPUSA publication?
 
Interestingly, Horne made this disclosure or boast at a reception for the CPUSA archives at Tamiment Library at New York University. The interesting title of his talk was, “Rethinking the History and Future of the Communist Party.”
 
Horne referred to “Frank Marshall Davis, who was certainly in the orbit of the CP - if not a member…” Of course, we know he was a member.

So how and why was Horne in a position to disclose this blockbuster information about Davis and Obama? Did he have inside information?
 
Two things are clear: All of Davis’s personal papers should be immediately released in the name of the public’s right to know. And Davis’s FBI file, also in the possession of Tidwell, should be released as well (AIM has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the same file).
 
These are questions that must be answered because, other than Obama’s recent Berlin speech, where do we find any solid evidence of his opposition to the communist philosophy?
 
The Delay
 
Coming more than five months after AIM ran its first story exposing Davis’s influence over Obama, there is no excuse for AP’s blatant dishonesty. It seems to represent another example of what Andrew Walden of the Hawaii Free Press has referred to as a campaign to create a CPUSA-free version of Hawaii history.
 
It is noteworthy that the AP writer, Sudhin Thanawala, who is based in Honolulu, wrote a previous story about Obama’s upbringing which began, “Growing up as a young man of mixed race, Barack Obama benefited from the spirit of tolerance that defined Hawaii’s racial climate.” Nothing about the CPUSA, which was a major influence in Hawaii, was in that story, either. This piece quoted Takara as well.
 
Some supporters of Davis and Obama, including Davis’s self-proclaimed son, have been waging a vigorous defense of Davis, even on Obama’s official website, and this pressure could have gotten to AP. But this alleged son, Mark Davis, has no credibility, having written erroneously that his father was not a CPUSA member and not Obama‘s mentor.
 
If the AP wire service were doing its job, it should have broken this story, rather than running something five months later trying to distort and obscure the truth.
 
AIM is urging its supporters to monitor where this dishonest AP story is appearing and protest to the appropriate editors that it deliberately ignores the truth about Davis‘s communist affiliations, which were documented in numerous congressional hearings and reports in addition to Tidwell-edited books. These editors can ask AP to correct the record and publish the truth.
 
Obama Campaign Influence?
 
The blatant fraud and deception in the AP story may reflect thinking at the highest levels of the Obama campaign that, if the complete truth about the Obama-Davis relationship were made known, the candidate would be sunk. They must understand that Obama’s baggage would prevent him from getting a security clearance in the U.S. Government (none is required for a presidential candidate).
 
After all, they must be asking themselves, what American in his or her right mind would vote for a candidate who took “advice about race and college” - to quote AP - from a Communist pawn of Moscow?
 
Viewed in a national security context, the Frank Marshall Davis scandal is far more serious than Obama and his wife and children hearing Jeremiah Wright’s anti-American and anti-white sermons. Indeed, the Davis influence on Obama may help explain why Obama would attend Wright’s church, take his children there, and be receptive to his message for many years. It also may explain why Obama would admittedly attend socialist conferences and pick Marxist professors as friends in college before launching his political career in the home of communist terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
 
But if you didn’t know that Davis was a Communist, this pattern of associations with unsavory characters cannot be traced back to Obama’s formative high-school years.
 
So the AP story looks like an attempt to put the best possible face on something that could fatally wound Obama and leave him in the position this November of being perceived as a fringe McGovern-style candidate without McGovern’s legislative credentials and war record.
 
Depths of Dishonesty
 
Let me explain how dishonest this AP story is.
 
AP called my public relations representative shortly after I held a May 22nd briefing through America’s Survival, Inc., releasing two reports that featured extensive documentation about Obama‘s communist connections. One, by Herbert Romerstein and myself, examined Davis and his influence on Obama in Hawaii. The other examined Obama’s communist and socialist connections in Chicago. This material was provided to the AP reporter and I personally followed up, offering any additional information which might be needed.
 
I didn’t hear back.
 
Now I know why. The reporter all along was carefully planning a piece designed to whitewash Davis and try to save Obama’s campaign from the biggest scandal of all - his association with an identified communist.
 
Who or what is the reporter scared of? Or is the reporter just blatantly dishonest? Whatever the motive, this is more evidence of a notorious pro-Obama media bias that we must quickly act to overcome.
 
Indeed, the AP story has to be understood in the context of media support for Obama becoming a major issue of the campaign. It should be remembered that Obama’s campaign strategist, David Axelrod, is a former Chicago Tribune reporter, and Obama’s press spokesperson is Linda Douglass, formerly of CBS News, ABC News, and the National Journal.
 
Was the AP’s Thanawala performing a free service for the campaign? Whatever the case, the story is itself a scandal and another low point for journalism. It also provides an opportunity for the truth to come out - about Obama and his lapdog press corps.
 
*AP’s main number in New York is: 1-212-621-1500. AP is run by a board of directors and its managing director for U.S. news is Michael Oreskes, a former New York Times journalist. The AP executive editor is Kathleen Carroll.
 
Family Security Matters Contributing Editor Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of Accuracy in Media, and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.org.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communism; cpusa; frankdavis; obama; obamatruthfile; propagandawingofdnc

1 posted on 08/05/2008 4:06:12 AM PDT by K-oneTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Since UPI closed the AP has controlled most daily newspapers. The slant of the AP, in my opinion, is why most papers are failing.

The AP supplies the bulk of coverage for most papers. The obvious slanted views of the AP and the outright dishonesty of the AP finally gets to people and they cancel their subscription.

People are not moving away from the news, They just don’t trust the newspapers. A lot of the blame goes to the AP.


2 posted on 08/05/2008 4:16:18 AM PDT by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

And this is surprising because....?


3 posted on 08/05/2008 4:16:23 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Vote Conservative Repuplican!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
Photobucket
4 posted on 08/05/2008 4:19:39 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paguch
People are not moving away from the news, They just don’t trust the newspapers. A lot of the blame goes to the AP.

After all the blatant liberal hatefilled bias, the lies, the deception, and the outright skew of facts and truth, why should anyone in their right mind rely on anything these liars report?

You are exactly spot on. People are not shunning the news the just want accurate accounts of it. People will just keep seeking alternative sources of news, because what they keep getting from the mainstream is so outragiously biased and deceptive!

All the DBM news, and it's largely comes from the AP's reporting, is what just another, "it all depends on what the the meaning of is,is." Never take these people accounts as accurate. Never believe them, they have shown time and time again they do not deserve to be trusted!!

5 posted on 08/05/2008 4:27:37 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Vote Conservative Repuplican!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ92W74knSg

This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?pageId=71383

Monday, August 04, 2008


WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Book links Obama to massacre of Christians
Senator’s continuing ally launches genocidal tribal violence


Posted: August 03, 2008
9:35 pm Eastern


WorldNetDaily

Barack Obama and Raila Odinga

U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has continued to support Kenya’s Raila Odinga, even after Odinga has been blamed for inciting tribal violence and slaughtering Christians, according to an explosive new book written by WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi.

In “The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality,” Corsi argues that Odinga’s protests following his loss to U.S.-backed Mwai Kibaki in Kenya’s 2007 presidential election led to a wave of tribal and religious violence aimed against Kibaki’s majority Kikuyu tribe.

The violence Obama’s ally was blamed for included the slaughter of some 50 Pentecostal Christians.

As WND reported earlier, during his first visit to Kenya as a U.S. Senator in 2006, Obama openly campaigned for Odinga, to the point where Kenyan government spokesman Alfred Mutua accused Obama of meddling inappropriately in Kenyan presidential politics. Mutua charged during a television news video that Obama had become a “stooge” to Odinga during the Kenyan presidential election campaign. Obama’s father belonged to the same Luo tribe as Odinga.

In the disputed Dec. 27, 2007, presidential vote, Odinga charged he was denied winning the presidency by voter fraud.

After the election, Odinga pressed for a power-sharing arrangement in which he would be the prime minister in a government where Kibaki was president, with the two factions sharing a 50-50 power split in the cabinet.

Odinga’s claim led to widespread fighting that killed more than 1,000 people in the weeks after the election, leaving more than 350,000 Kenyans displaced.

While proving involvement is difficult, many in Kenya assumed the post-election violence was supported, if not organized, behind the scenes by Odinga and his Orange Democratic Movement party.

In a horrifying incident following the election, at least 50 people, including women and children, were killed when an angry mob forced Kikuyu Christians into an Assemblies of God Pentecostal church and set fire to the church, hacking with machetes any of the Christians who tried to escape the flames.

The violence occurred in the village of Eldoret, about 185 miles northwest of Nairobi. The massacre in the church was part of youth gang violence aimed at harassing the Kikuyu Christian minority, which before the election numbered around 20 percent of Eldoret’s 500,000 people.

After the church burning, the vast majority of Eldoret’s Kikuyu Christian minority fled the city, in fear of their lives.

A Reuters video documented the Eldoret church massacre:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Bb9TeChiU

Christian missionaries report over 300 Christian churches were severely damaged or destroyed in the violence that swept the country, but mosques were left undisturbed.

Another horrific report came from the Telegram in London, reporting the wave of post-election violence involved members of President Kibaki’s Kikuyu tribe being attacked in Nairobi slums by ethnic groups including gangs of Luo tribe youth and men who were engaging in gang rapes of women and sodomizing boys as young as five years of age.

The Telegraph reported the vast majority of the victims were assaulted in their homes and all had been targeted because of their Kikuyu tribe membership.

Mobs slashed their way into homes, attacking everyone they found with machetes and clubs. Youths raped women in front of their husbands and many wives were then dragged from their homes and killed.

In the final days of the New Hampshire Democratic Party primary, after the post-election violence in Kenya, Obama told reporters he had telephoned Raila Odinga by telephone.

Obama sided with Odinga, indicating Odinga was willing to meet with Kibaki.

“Obviously he [Odinga] believes that the votes were not tallied properly,” Obama told reporters, almost as if he were running for election in Kenya. “But what I urged was that all the leaders there, regardless of their position on the election, tell their supporters to stand down, to desist with the violence and resolve it in a peaceful way with Kenyan laws.”

Reporters asked if Obama had telephoned Kenyan President Kibaki.

“I have not spoken to President Kibaki as yet,” the senator answered, “but I hope to get in touch with him some time soon. I want to see if I can be helpful.”

It is unclear whether Obama ever spoke with Kibaki, after a rough initial meeting during Obama’s 2006 Kenyan trip.


6 posted on 08/05/2008 4:37:33 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

The tough job now is about highlighting all the lies who CREATE OBAMA’s BUBBLE and FRAUD despite the MSM incredible and shameless activism...
Will the lies fool the american people?


7 posted on 08/05/2008 4:47:33 AM PDT by Ulysse (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

And if this man gets elected, Kenya violence will be coming to a city near you. It is hard to imagine US troops coming against “we the people”, but, hey, look at what Janet Reno did at Waco.


8 posted on 08/05/2008 5:00:18 AM PDT by GWMcClintock (The last thing the US needs is B.O.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Liberals should be proud of their communist and facsist affiliations - it’s what they are.

If they don’t highlight their leftist leanings, we need to do it for them - at all public venues.


9 posted on 08/05/2008 5:03:04 AM PDT by sergeantdave (We are entering the Age of the Idiot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

It wasn’t surprising. I just thought it was good article to share.


10 posted on 08/05/2008 5:33:05 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
 
A MUST SEE VIDEO! and MUST SHARE FAR AND WIDE!

11 posted on 08/05/2008 5:55:25 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine
Let's not forget that both Barack's mother and father had Communist leanings. Where is the mainstream media on this??



Penetrating Insights into the Obvious
12 posted on 08/05/2008 9:16:59 AM PDT by MichaelAsher54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
I just thought it was good article to share.

Oh, it definetly is a good article to share I was being sarcastically rhetorical. I just can't believe all the DBM news services have gone out of biz yet because of their obvious unfair, highly biased, crudely deceptive reporting.

13 posted on 08/05/2008 9:47:05 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Vote Conservative Repuplican!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse

How in the holy H*LL does he gets away with stuff like this?
It’s almost like he IS the anti-Christ!


14 posted on 08/05/2008 12:38:22 PM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

.

Are you guys still helping me Google the story about Frank Davis being in trouble about activities with underage boys, and the story mentioning his preference about ‘little brown boys’ and his ‘affection’ for little Barry?
I read it, but now can’t find it.

.


15 posted on 08/05/2008 12:40:55 PM PDT by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson